Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of a novel kappa opioid receptor agonist ZYKR1: a randomized double-blind placebo-control phase 1 study in healthy adult human participants.

To perform first-in-human single-dose escalation trial of ZYKR1, which is a potent, selective, and peripherally-restricted kappa opioid receptor agonist, is the purpose of this study. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single ascending dose study conducted at Zydus Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India included healthy male participants aged 18-55 years and weighing > 50 kg. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ZYKR1. The secondary objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PD) of ZYKR1. Participants received ZYKR1 (0.5 - 6 mcg/kg) or placebo infused intravenously in 15 ± 1 min. Of total five dose groups (0.5 - 6 mcg/kg), each group included eight participants with six and two randomized to ZYKR1 and placebo, respectively. Three participants experienced six treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); two were gastrointestinal disorders (nausea and vomiting at 2 mcg/kg); and four were related to the nervous system (headache (at 2 mcg/kg) and facial tingling, facial numbness and paresthesia (at 6 mcg/kg)); all TEAEs were mild and resolved without sequelae. The Cmax of ZYKR1 was achieved after 15 - 20 min of start of infusion. The mean exposures (Cmax and AUC0 - t) increased in a dose-proportional manner. The mean t1/2 ranged from 2.20 to 2.98 h across the dose range. Increase in the mean prolactin level was significantly higher in treatment groups compared with that in the placebo group. Intravenous ZYKR1 at doses up to 6 mcg/kg showed acceptable safety and tolerability and demonstrated a short half-life with principal route of excretion as renal. ZYKR1 displayed a potent PD effect reflected by increased prolactin levels, supporting further study in patients. Trial registration Clinical Trial Registry of India: CTRI/2018/07/014927. Date of registration: 18/07/2018.

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of the Oral NLRP3 Inflammasome Inhibitor ZYIL1: First-in-Human Phase 1 Studies (Single Ascending Dose and Multiple Ascending Dose).

ZYIL1 is a nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain, leucine rich repeat and pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome inhibitor, which prevents NLRP3-induced apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase activation and recruitment domain oligomerization, thus inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome pathway. We investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic profiles of ZYIL1 after single and multiple doses in healthy subjects. The subjects aged 18-55 years were enrolled in 2 different studies: single and multiple ascending dose. Blood/urine samples were collected at designated time points for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis. In the single-ascending-dose study, 30 subjects were enrolled (6 subjects each in 5 dose groups). One adverse event was reported during the study. ZYIL1 was well absorbed with median time to maximum plasma concentration at 1-1.5 hours. The exposures were dose proportional across the dose ranges. ZYIL1 is excreted as an unchanged form via the renal route. The mean elimination half-life was 6-7 hours. In the multiple-ascending-dose study, 18 subjects were enrolled (6 subjects each in 3 dose groups). Eleven adverse events were reported by 6 subjects during the study. The accumulation index at steady state for area under the plasma concentration-time curve indicated that ZYIL1 has a marginal accumulation upon repeated dosing. Dose-proportional exposure was observed across the dose ranges. All subjects showed >90% interleukin (IL)-1ß inhibition in all dose groups for both studies. Inhibition in IL-1ß and IL-18 was observed throughout the 14 days of treatment in the multiple-dose study. The safety profile, rapid absorption, marginal accumulation, and significant inhibition of IL-1ß and IL-18 level support its development for the management of inflammatory disorders.

Proof-of-concept study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of saroglitazar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis.

BACKGROUND & AIM: Saroglitazar is a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonist with dual agonistic properties (α/γ). Due to a strong mechanistic rationale, we aimed to test the safety and efficacy of saroglitazar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) who were either ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) resistant or intolerant. METHODS: In this double-blind, phase II proof-of-concept trial, 37 patients with PBC were randomized to saroglitazar 4 mg (n = 13), saroglitazar 2 mg (n = 14), or placebo (n = 10) daily for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level at Week 16. RESULTS: A significant reduction of mean ALP levels was observed at Week 16 relative to baseline in both the saroglitazar 4 mg (least-squares [LS] mean =-163.3 U/L, SE = 25.1, p <0.001) and 2 mg (LS mean =-155.8 U/L, SE = 24.4, p <0.001) groups, compared with placebo (LS mean =-21.1 U/L, SE = 28.9). Treatment with saroglitazar resulted in a rapid reduction of ALP concentration at Week 4 that was sustained through the study duration. At least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event occurred in 11 (84.6%) patients in the saroglitazar 4 mg group, in 12 (85.7%) patients in the 2 mg group and in 8 (80%) patients in the placebo group. Study drug was discontinued in 4 patients (3 patients in the 4 mg group and 1 patient in the 2 mg group) due to aminotransferase increases that promptly returned to baseline values after drug discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Saroglitazar at 2 mg and 4 mg daily was tolerated and resulted in rapid and sustained improvements in ALP. Further studies are underway at a daily dose of 2 mg and 1 mg due to the higher incidence of elevated liver enzymes observed with the 4 mg dose. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03112681 LAY SUMMARY: Saroglitazar resulted in a rapid and sustained improvement in alkaline phosphatase levels in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. The mean percentage reductions in alkaline phosphatase levels were 49% and 51% in the saroglitazar 4 mg and 2 mg groups compared to 3% in the placebo group.

Simultaneous estimation of ZY-19489 and its active metabolite ZY-20486 in human plasma using LC-MS/MS, a novel antimalarial compound.

Aim: ZY-19489 is a new antimalarial drug candidate and selective LC-MS/MS method was established for estimation of ZY-19489 and its metabolite in human plasma. Materials & methods: LLE was employed for extraction, mass spectrometric quantification performed using positive ionization mode and DCP-IMP was used as an internal standard. The chromatographic separation was achieved using mobile phase 5 mM ammonium formate in water and 0.1% v/v ammonia solution in methanol:acetonitrile (90:10% v/v) and column Agilent Zorbex Extended C18, 3.5 µm, 100 × 4.6 mm with a 6-min run time. Results: The calibration curve of ZY-19489 was linear over range 1-500 ng/ml and 2-200 ng/ml for metabolite. Assay was reproducible, selective and devoid of matrix effect. Conclusion: The validated assay was implemented for clinical sample analysis derived from healthy human subjects and parasitemia-induced subjects.

New drugs and clinical trials rules 2019: Changes in responsibilities of the ethics committee.

The New drugs and Clinical trials rules 2019 (New rules) was introduced on 19th March 2019 by Government of India. New rules have set specific requirements for ethics committee (EC). The EC is required to follow requirements set as per New rules and to forward their report to Central Licensing Authority (CLA). This document is divided into different sections like definitions and applicable chapter & schedules for EC; changes related to registration of clinical studies and biomedical and health research; changes related to constitution, functions, proceedings, responsibility of EC for clinical trial; maintenance of records by EC; suspension and cancellation of registration of EC, post-trial access of drugs, changes and clarity related to academic clinical trials and role of ECs in compensation and medical management process.

Abrogation of postprandial triglyceridemia with dual PPAR α/γ agonist in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

AIMS: Lowering postprandial lipemia may mitigate cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetic dyslipidemia. This study was aimed to investigate whether saroglitazar suppresses postprandial lipemia in patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia. METHODS: This was a 12-week, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of saroglitazar in patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia. Thirty patients were randomized (1:1) to receive saroglitazar 4 mg or placebo orally once daily with metformin for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in plasma triglyceride (TG) area under the curve (AUC) on a standardized 8-h fat tolerance test. RESULTS: Thirty participants were randomized for interventions and eventually data of 19 participants qualified for per protocol analyses. Mean (SD) age in saroglitazar was 53.1 (8.8) years and 54.9 (7.7) years in placebo group. After 12 weeks, saroglitazar significantly lowered postprandial TG-AUC by - 458.3 (144.0) (- 25.7%, 95% CI - 765.1 to - 151.4) versus an increase of + 10.9 (157.9) (+ 0.5%, 95% CI - 325.6 to 347.3) mg/dL h in placebo group (P < 0.05). Saroglitazar lowered postprandial TG incremental AUC versus placebo: - 329.4 (89.9) (- 59%) versus + 80.4 (99.4) (+ 10%) mg/dL h (P < 0.05). HbA1c (%) decreased by - 0.36 (0.42) in the saroglitazar group as compared to an increase of + 1.26 (0.46) (P < 0.05) with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The saroglitazar treatment significantly improved postprandial TGs in people with diabetic dyslipidemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of India; trial Registration No.: CTRI/2015/06/005845 and Date of registration: June 02, 2015.

Outcomes of Desidustat Treatment in People with Anemia and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Phase 2 Study.

BACKGROUND: Desidustat (ZYAN1) is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHI) that stimulates erythropoiesis. Stabilizing HIF via PHI is developing as a new therapeutic approach to treat anemia secondary to chronic kidney disease (CKD). This trial evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Desidustat in adult CKD patients with anemia, who were not on dialysis. METHODS: This was a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, 6-week, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, safety and efficacy study. A total of 117 eligible patients were randomized to 4 arms: 100, 150, 200 mg, or placebo. The investigational product was administered every alternate day for 6 weeks in fasting conditions. The primary endpoint was change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline to week 6. RESULTS: Baseline demographics were well balanced among all the treatment arms. In the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, a mean Hb increase of 1.57, 2.22, and 2.92 g/dL in Desidustat 100, 150, and 200 mg arms, respectively, was observed post 6 weeks treatment. The responder rate (≥1 g/dL increase) was 66% in 100 mg, 75% in 150 mg, and 83% in 200 mg treatment arms, in the mITT population. Eighteen patients had at least one treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE), and 5 patients reported at least one drug-related mild TEAE. No death or serious adverse event was reported during the trial. CONCLUSION: There was dose-related increase in Hb across all doses compared to placebo in mITT and per-protocol populations. Desidustat also increased pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax and AUC in dose-related manner. There was no significant change in vital signs, electrocardiographic parameters, or safety laboratory values. Clinical Trial Registration Number CTRI/2017/05/008534 (registered on May 11, 2017).

Limited Sampling Strategy for Accurate Prediction of Pharmacokinetics of Saroglitazar: A 3-point Linear Regression Model Development and Successful Prediction of Human Exposure.

PURPOSE: Our aim was to develop and validate the extrapolative performance of a regression model using a limited sampling strategy for accurate estimation of the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve for saroglitazar. METHODS: Healthy subject pharmacokinetic data from a well-powered food-effect study (fasted vs fed treatments; n = 50) was used in this work. The first 25 subjects' serial plasma concentration data up to 72 hours and corresponding AUC0-t (ie, 72 hours) from the fasting group comprised a training dataset to develop the limited sampling model. The internal datasets for prediction included the remaining 25 subjects from the fasting group and all 50 subjects from the fed condition of the same study. The external datasets included pharmacokinetic data for saroglitazar from previous single-dose clinical studies. Limited sampling models were composed of 1-, 2-, and 3-concentration-time points' correlation with AUC0-t of saroglitazar. Only models with regression coefficients (R2) >0.90 were screened for further evaluation. The best R2 model was validated for its utility based on mean prediction error, mean absolute prediction error, and root mean square error. Both correlations between predicted and observed AUC0-t of saroglitazar and verification of precision and bias using Bland-Altman plot were carried out. FINDINGS: None of the evaluated 1- and 2-concentration-time points models achieved R2 > 0.90. Among the various 3-concentration-time points models, only 4 equations passed the predefined criterion of R2 > 0.90. Limited sampling models with time points 0.5, 2, and 8 hours (R2 = 0.9323) and 0.75, 2, and 8 hours (R2 = 0.9375) were validated. Mean prediction error, mean absolute prediction error, and root mean square error were <30% (predefined criterion) and correlation (r) was at least 0.7950 for the consolidated internal and external datasets of 102 healthy subjects for the AUC0-t prediction of saroglitazar. The same models, when applied to the AUC0-t prediction of saroglitazar sulfoxide, showed mean prediction error, mean absolute prediction error, and root mean square error <30% and correlation (r) was at least 0.9339 in the same pool of healthy subjects. IMPLICATIONS: A 3-concentration-time points limited sampling model predicts the exposure of saroglitazar (ie, AUC0-t) within predefined acceptable bias and imprecision limit. Same model was also used to predict AUC0-∞. The same limited sampling model was found to predict the exposure of saroglitazar sulfoxide within predefined criteria. This model can find utility during late-phase clinical development of saroglitazar in the patient population.

Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Saroglitazar Magnesium, a Novel Dual PPARαγ Agonist, in Healthy Adult Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) have recently become a focus of interest for their important roles in glucose and lipid metabolism. In humans, PPARα activation causes a decrease in plasma triglyceride (TG) levels, enhancement of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and simultaneous enhancement of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) lipolysis, whereas PPARγ agonists act as insulin sensitizers and improve insulin resistance, which is very useful in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Saroglitazar magnesium is a dual PPAR agonist with potent predominant PPARα and moderate PPARγ activity and the first glitazar to be granted marketing authorization in India. This study was conducted to evaluate the oral bioavailability and safety and tolerability of a Lipaglyn™ (saroglitazar magnesium) 4-mg tablet in healthy, adult human subjects under fed relative to fasting conditions. METHODS: This was a single-dose, open-label, randomized, single-treatment, two-period, two-conditions (fed vs. fasting), two-sequence, crossover study planned in 54 healthy subjects. Food effect (high-calorie and high-fat breakfast) was examined by comparing pharmacokinetic data of saroglitazar and its metabolite saroglitazar sulfoxide in plasma samples collected pre-dose and serially up to 72 h post-dose. Pharmacokinetic data were analyzed using the standard non-compartmental approach. RESULTS: A total of 54 subjects were enrolled in the study, out of them 50 subjects had completed the study and were analyzed. The presence of food had a minor impact on the disposition of saroglitazar. While food reduced C max (maximum concentration) of saroglitazar by 30%, the extent of absorption as measured by AUC∞ (area under the concentration time curve from time zero to infinity) was not influenced. This was further supported by the bioequivalence data between fasted and fed conditions for saroglitazar, where 90% CIs (confidence intervals) of the adjusted geometric mean of the fed relative to the fasted condition ranged from 101.37% to 108.07% for AUC∞ and from 63.45% to 74.68% for C max. Other parameters such as T max (time of maximum concentration) and T 1/2 (elimination half-life) were not influenced by the food intake. Saroglitazar was well tolerated in the study, and the reported adverse events were mild in nature. CONCLUSION: For the single-dose study, the absorption rate is affected by food as the 90% CI of C max is outside 80.00-125.00%. However, there is no impact of food on the extent of absorption of saroglitazar. The observed lower C max of saroglitazar with food has no clinical relevance since the therapeutic efficacy of saroglitazar was achieved after multiple-dose administration, suggesting the importance of total exposure.