Systematic Review and Expert Consensus on the Use of Orthoses (Splints and Casts) with Adults and Children after Burn Injury to Determine Practice Guidelines.

The objective of this review was to systematically evaluate the available literature addressing the use of orthoses (splints and casts) with adult and pediatric burn survivors and determine whether practice guidelines could be proposed. This review provides evidence-based recommendations specifically for rehabilitation professionals who are responsible for burn survivor rehabilitation. A summary recommendation was made after the literature was retrieved using a systematic review and critical appraisal by multiple authors. The level of evidence of the literature was determined in accordance with the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine criteria. Due to the low level of evidence in the available literature, only one practice guideline could be recommended: orthotic use should be considered as a treatment choice for improving range of motion or reducing contracture in adults who have sustained a burn injury. To address the rehabilitation-specific gaps found in the literature regarding orthotic use in burn rehabilitation and provide guidance to clinicians, a formal expert consensus exercise was conducted as a final step to the project. The resultant manuscript provides a summary of the literature regarding orthotic use with burn patients, one practice guideline, proposed orthotic terminology and additional practice recommendations based on expert opinion. The limitations in the current literature are also discussed, and suggestions are made for future studies in the area of orthotic use after burn injury.

Burn Hand or Finger Goniometric Measurements: Sum of the Isolated Parts and the Composite Whole.

Accurate assessment of hand function following a burn is important for patient impairment determination. Goniometric measurement of hand or finger range of motion (ROM) is typically done measuring individual finger joints with the adjacent joint in extension (isolated) or measuring the joints in a fist position (composite). The purpose of this study was to compare if the total flexion motion of the summed angles of the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and distal interphalangeal joints in burned hands were equal when performed in an isolated vs a composite manner. Passive flexion ROM angles were collected prospectively and measured at the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and distal interphalangeal with the adjacent joints extended to measure isolated angles and with the adjacent joints fully flexed for composite angles. Thumb joints were excluded. ROM for isolated and composite positions of eight fingers was compared individually and as an aggregate. Finger measurements from 145 adult patients were compared. The study population was predominately male (69%) with a mean age of 41 ± 16.6 years. Mean total burn size was 14.2 ± 13.2%. A total of 739 fingers contributed 2217 joint ROM comparisons. Aggregate analysis of isolated ROM was 235.5° ± 52.1° compared with composite ROM of 226.8° ± 53.2° (P < .0001). Individual fingers showed significant differences between the two measurement methods as well (P ≤ .0040). The methods used to measure hand or finger ROM profoundly influence how hand impairment is reported. Measurement of isolated joint angles results in greater ROM values compared with composite angles, which are often more relevant for functional hand positions. Therefore, composite angles are recommended.

Commercially available interactive video games in burn rehabilitation: therapeutic potential.

Commercially available interactive video games (IVG) like the Nintendo Wii™ (NW) and PlayStation™II Eye Toy (PE) are increasingly used in the rehabilitation of patients with burn. Such games have gained popularity in burn rehabilitation because they encourage range of motion (ROM) while distracting from pain. However, IVGs were not originally designed for rehabilitation purposes but rather for entertainment and may lack specificity for achieving rehabilitative goals. Objectively evaluating the specific demands of IVGs in relation to common burn therapy goals will determine their true therapeutic benefit and guide their use in burn rehabilitation. Upper extremity (UE) motion of 24 normal children was measured using 3D motion analysis during play with the two types of IVGs most commonly described for use after burn: NW and PE. Data was analyzed using t-tests and One-way Analysis of Variance. Active range of motion for shoulder flexion and abduction during play with both PE and NW was within functional range, thus supporting the idea that IVGs offer activities with therapeutic potential to improve ROM. PE resulted in higher demands and longer duration of UE motion than NW, and therefore may be the preferred tool when UE ROM or muscular endurance are the goals of rehabilitation. When choosing a suitable IVG for application in rehabilitation, the user's impairment together with the therapeutic attributes of the IVG should be considered to optimize outcome.

Positioning, splinting, and contracture management.

Whether a patient with burn injury is an adult or child, contracture management should be the primary focus of burn rehabilitation throughout the continuum of care. Positioning and splinting are crucial components of a comprehensive burn rehabilitation program that emphasizes contracture prevention. The emphasis of these devices throughout the phases of rehabilitation fluctuates to meet the changing needs of patients with burn injury. Early, effective, and consistent use of positioning devices and splints is recommended for successful management of burn scar contracture.

Select practices in management and rehabilitation of burns: a survey report.

The purpose of this study is to document the organization and current practices in physical rehabilitation across burn centers. An online survey developed for the specific purposes of this study sought information regarding a) logistics of the burn center; b) inpatient and outpatient treatment of patients with burn injury; and c) specific protocols in the treatment of a few complications secondary to burn injuries. Of the 159 responses received, 115 were received from the United States, 20 from Australia, 16 from Canada, and 7 from New Zealand. The overall sample included responses from 76 physical therapists (PTs) and 78 occupational therapists. Seventy-three of those surveyed considered themselves primarily a burn therapist. Nurses (86%) were reported as primarily responsible for wound care of inpatients, followed by wound care technicians (24%). Ninety-seven percent of the therapists reported following their own treatment plans. The trunk and areas of head and neck were treated by both PTs and occupational therapists, whereas the lower extremities continue to be treated predominantly by PTs. Some common practices regarding treatment of a few complications secondary to burn injuries such as splinting to prevent contractures, treatment of exposed or ruptured extensor tendons, exposed Achilles tendons, heterotopic ossification, postoperative ambulation, conditioning, scar massage, and use of compression garments are described. Opportunities exist for 1) developing a common document for practice guidelines in physical rehabilitation of burns; and 2) conducting collaborative studies to evaluate treatment interventions and outcomes.

Burn rehabilitation and research: proceedings of a consensus summit.

Burn rehabilitation is an essential component of successful patient care. In May 2008, a group of burn rehabilitation clinicians met to discuss the status and future needs of burn rehabilitation. Fifteen topic areas pertinent to clinical burn rehabilitation were addressed. Consensus positions and suggested future research directions regarding the physical aspects of burn rehabilitation are shared.

Effects of skin grafting on successful prosthetic use in children with lower extremity amputation.

The use of skin grafts after lower extremity amputation in pediatric patients remains a controversial decision. A skin graft may help to preserve residual limb length and knee joint function; however, the literature suggests that it may make the patient more susceptible to complications. Directly contrasting children with and without skin grafts on their residual limbs will provide important data for the clinician making this decision. This study compares amputation characteristics, complications, and functional outcomes of these two populations. A retrospective chart analysis was performed on 45 pediatric patients who underwent lower extremity amputation between 1997 and 2006. Patients were divided into two groups: the graft group had skin grafts on their residual lower extremity limb(s) and the no graft group had no skin grafts present on the residual lower extremity limb(s). The mean time from amputation to follow-up was 4.5 years in the graft group and 7.0 years in the no graft group (P = .07). The average age at amputation for the graft group was 9.4 +/- 1.4 years and 5.9 +/- 1.1 years for the no graft group (P = .04). The graft group had a significantly longer hospital stay with 91 inpatient days vs 31 inpatient days in the no graft group (P = .03). There was no increased incidence of surgical revisions or reported problems with prosthetic wear in the graft group. Both groups achieved comparable levels of independence with ambulation. The presence of skin grafts on a child's amputated limb does not adversely affect functional outcome and does not lead to greater prosthetic complications for the child.