Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 134(1): 106-13, 2006 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16399189

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative tonsillectomy pain between 3 commonly used surgical devices: the Harmonic Ultrasonic Scalpel (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH), the Coblator (ArthroCare Corp, Sunnyvale, CA), and electrocautery. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective, randomized trial. One hundred thirty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive a tonsillectomy with 1 of 3 surgical devices. All patients were asked to fill out a postoperative diary. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in pain scores were revealed between the Coblator and electrocautery (P = 0.02) and between the Coblator and the Ultrasonic Scalpel (P = 0.003), with the Coblator having lower pain scores. Electrocautery and the Ultrasonic Scalpel did not differ significantly from each other. The Coblation method showed a strong trend toward quicker return to normal diet. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing tonsillectomy with the Coblator device reported less pain over a 10-day period than patients undergoing tonsillectomy with electrocautery or the Ultrasonic Scalpel. Pain after tonsillectomy remains a major issue for our patients. The choice of surgical instrument appears to be one way to reduce this pain. EBM RATING: A-1b.


Assuntos
Eletrocoagulação/instrumentação , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Ondas de Rádio , Tonsilectomia/efeitos adversos , Tonsilectomia/instrumentação , Ultrassom , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Ingestão de Alimentos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...