Open Reduction Internal Fixation vs Primary Arthrodesis for Displaced Lisfranc Injuries: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus whether the primary surgical method should be open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or primary arthrodesis (PA) for Lisfranc injuries. The aim of our randomized controlled trial was to compare ORIF and PA for displaced Lisfranc injuries. METHODS: This study was a national multicenter randomized controlled trial. Altogether 43 displaced Lisfranc injuries were enrolled in this trial. The primary outcome measure was Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) at a 24-months follow-up. The secondary outcome measures were VAS-FA pain, function, and other complaints subscales and the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Midfoot Scale. All outcomes were measured at 6, 12, and 24 months. We were unable to reach the planned sample size of 60 patients; thus, the study remains underpowered. RESULTS: The mean VAS-FA Overall score in the ORIF group was 86.5 (95% CI 77.9, 95.1) and 80.1 (95% CI 72.0, 88.1) in the PA group at the 24-month follow-up. We did not find eligible evidence of a difference in VAS-FA Overall scores (mean between-group difference 6.5 [95% CI -5.3, 18.2], Cohen d = 0.100). CONCLUSION: We did not find evidence of a difference in VAS-FA between ORIF and PA in patients with displaced Lisfranc injuries, and thus both are viable options for the initial surgical method. The trial is underpowered; however, the data may be included in a meta-analysis of similarly designed randomized controlled trials.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02953067 24 October 2016.

Evaluation of the changes in incidence and patient age of knee arthroscopy along with changes in time between knee arthroscopy and arthroplasty between 1998 and 2018: a nationwide register study.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence has led to guidelines to refrain from recommending knee arthroscopy for patients with an osteoarthritis diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the latest changes in the incidence of arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee disease, changes in the ages of those patients and the delay between knee arthroscopy and arthroplasty, in Finland between 1998 and 2018. METHOD: The data for were collected from the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register (NHDR). All knee arthroplasties and arthroscopies performed due to osteoarthritis, degenerative meniscal tears, and traumatic meniscal tears were included. Incidence rates (per 100,000 person-years) as well as the median age of patients were calculated. RESULTS: The incidence of arthroscopy decreased 74% (413 to 106 per 100,000 person-years) and knee arthroplasty increased 179% (94 to 262 per 100,000 person-years) between 1998 and 2018. The incidence of all arthroscopies increased until 2006. Subsequently, the incidence of arthroscopy due to OA decreased by 91% and arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) for degenerative meniscal tears decreased by 77% until 2018. The decrease of traumatic meniscal tears begun later, leading to decrease of 57% between 2011 and 2018. Conversely, the incidence of patients undergoing APM of traumatic meniscal tear increased 375%. The median age of patients who underwent knee arthroscopy decreased from 51 to 46 and from 71 to 69 in knee arthroplasty patients. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing evidence that recommends refraining from knee arthroscopy in OA and degenerative meniscal tears has led to a dramatic decrease in the incidence of arthroscopies. Simultaneously, the median age of the patients who undergo these operations has continued to decrease.

Outcomes after nonoperatively treated non-displaced Lisfranc injury: a retrospective case series of 55 patients.

BACKGROUND: Current knowledge of the role of the nonoperative treatment of Lisfranc injuries is based on a few retrospective case series. Hence, consensus on which patients can be treated nonoperatively does not exist. The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes after nonoperative treatment of Lisfranc injuries. METHODS: In this study, patients were collected by recruiting all computer tomography-confirmed Lisfranc injuries treated during a 5-year period at a major trauma hospital. Between 2 and 6 years after suffering the injury, patients completed the visual analogue scale foot and ankle questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 55 patients returned adequately completed questionnaires and were included in the study. Of those, 22 patients had avulsion fractures and 33 had simple non-displaced intra-articular fractures. Of these patients, 30 (55%) scored over 90 points in both the pain and function subscales of the VAS-FA, and 35 (64%) scored over 90 points overall. In addition, three (5%) patients scored under 60 points in both the pain and function subscales of the VAS-FA, and four (7%) scored under 60 points overall. Only one patient with avulsion fractures underwent secondary surgery. CONCLUSION: Nonoperative treatment has a role in the treatment of Lisfranc injuries, and the results of our study support the view that avulsion and simple intra-articular fractures with < 2 mm of displacement can be treated nonoperatively with high functional outcomes. The results of nonoperative and operative treatment should be compared in a prospective randomized controlled study setting in future studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case series.

Bioabsorbable vs. titanium screws for first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis: An in-vitro study.

BACKGROUND: The TMT-1 joint arthrodesis is a common repair for severe hallux valgus. Two crossing interfragmental screws, usually titanium or steel, and a locking plate or a plate with a compression screw are the most common fixation methods for first TMT joint arthrodesis. The qualities of an ideal fixation material include adequate strength and rigidity, biocompatibility, lack of interference with bone healing, lack of visibility and palpability, and a low risk of surgical removal. We sought to determine whether bioabsorbable cannulated screws would perform as well as titanium screws in anatomical models. METHODS: Identical anatomical TMT-1 arthrodesis was created with a saw by making a straight cut in 30 anatomical models (Sawbone®). The bioabsorbable and titanium screws were placed one at a time in exactly the same location in each model according to careful measurements. All 30 models were analyzed with a material testing machine (MTS Insight 30, Eden Prairie, USA). Each model was oriented 15° to the platform to simulate its position to the ground during mid-stance. RESULTS: In the single-cycle load-to-failure test, the mean yield load was 61.4 N ±â€¯5.7 N (range, 50.1 N-70.3 N) in the bioabsorbable screw group and 81.2 N ±â€¯12 N (range, 61.7 N-113.4 N) in the titanium screw group (P < .001). The respective values for the stiffness of the fixation were 8.1 N/mm ± 0.8 N/mm (range, 6.7 N/mm to 9.1 N/mm) and 9.7 N/mm ±â€¯1.8 N/mm (range, 6.9 N/mm to 12.6 N/mm) for the bioabsorbable and titanium groups (P = .004). The mean maximum failure loads in the bioabsorbable group were 85.1 N ±â€¯8.5 N (range, 67.1 N-97.2 N) and in the titanium group 120.6 N ±â€¯13.2 N (range, 96.7 N-136.7 N), respectively (P < .001). Analysis of the failure models shows bioabsorbable fixation failures caused by bending occur more often than in the titanium group. CONCLUSION: In biomechanical testing, titanium screws were stronger than bioabsorbable screws in the TMT-1 arthrodesis model tested, although bioabsorbable cannulated screws may be an alternative to titanium screws in the fixation Lapidus procedure.

Inter- and intraobserver reliability of non-weight-bearing foot radiographs compared with CT in Lisfranc injuries.

BACKGROUND: Injury of the tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint complex, known as Lisfranc injury, covers a wide range of injuries from subtle ligamentous injuries to severely displaced crush injuries. Although it is known that these injuries are commonly missed, the literature on the accuracy of the diagnostics is limited. The diagnostic accuracy of non-weight-bearing radiography (inter- or intraobserver reliability), however, has not previously been assessed among patients with Lisfranc injury. METHODS: One hundred sets of foot radiographs acquired due to acute foot injury were collected and anonymised. The diagnosis of these patients was confirmed with a CT scan. In one-third of the radiographs, there was no Lisfranc injury; in one-third, a nondisplaced (< 2 mm) injury; and in one-third, a displaced injury. The radiographs were assessed independently by three senior orthopaedic surgeons and three orthopaedic surgery residents. RESULTS: Fleiss kappa (κ) coefficient for interobserver reliability resulted in moderate correlation κ = 0.50 (95% CI: 0.45- 0.55) (first evaluation) and κ = 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.63) (second evaluation). After three months, the evaluation was repeated and the Cohen's kappa (κ) coefficient for intraobserver reliability showed substantial correlation κ = 0.71 (from 0.64 to 0.85). The mean (range) sensitivity was 76.1% (60.6-92.4) and specificity was 85.3% (52.9-100). The sensitivity of subtle injuries was lower than severe injuries (65.4% vs 87.1% p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of Lisfranc injury based on non-weight-bearing radiographs has moderate agreement between observers and substantial agreement between the same observer in different moments. A substantial number (24%) of injuries are missed if only non-weight-bearing radiographs are used. Nondisplaced injuries were more commonly missed than displaced injuries, and therefore, special caution should be used when the clinical signs are subtle. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Reduced incidence and economic cost of hardware removal after ankle fracture surgery: a 20-year nationwide registry study.

Background and purpose - Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a treatment method for unstable ankle fractures. During recent years, scientific evidence has shed light on surgical indications as well as on hardware removal. We assessed the incidence and trends of hardware removal procedures following ORIF of ankle fractures.Patients and methods - The study covered all patients 18 years of age and older who had an ankle fracture treated with ORIF in Finland between the years 1997 and 2016. Patient data were obtained from the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register.Results - 68,865 patients had an ankle fracture treated with ORIF in Finland during the 20-year study period between 1997 and 2016. A hardware removal procedure was performed on 27% of patients (n = 18,648). The incidence of hardware removal procedures after ankle fracture decreased from 31 (95% CI 29-32) per 100,000 person-years in the highest year 2001 (n = 1,247) to 13 (CI 12-14) per 100,000 person-years in 2016 (n = 593). Moreover, the proportion and number of removal operations performed within the first 3 months also decreased. The costs of removal procedures decreased from approximately €994,000 in 2001 to €472,600 in 2016.Interpretation - Removal of hardware after ankle surgery (ORIF) is a common operation with substantial costs. However, the incidence and cost of removals decreased during the study period, with a particular decrease in hardware removal operations within 3 months.

Incidence of hallux valgus primary surgical treatment. Finnish nationwide data from 1997 to 2014.

BACKGROUND: Many surgical procedures have been described for hallux valgus. Evidence provided by the current literature on the different procedures is, however, poor. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of HV surgery in Finland between 1997 and 2014 and to find out whether changes in operation techniques of HV have occurred during the study period. METHODS: The study included all adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent primary HV operation. Patients were included into study if they had been operated with a diagnosis of HV (ICD-10 code M20.1). The data were collected by the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register (NHDR). RESULTS: The total incidence of primary HV operations was 66.7 per 100,000 person-years in 1997 and 41.4 per 100,000 person-years in 2014. The incidence of arthroplasty operations of the MTP-1 joint decreased while at the same time the incidence of the MTP-1 joint arthrodesis and TMT-1 arthrodesis increased. The gender difference (13% men, 87% women) is consistent with previous studies. CONCLUSION: This study shows a significant decreasing trend of HV operations in Finland between 1997 and 2014. During the study period, the incidence of MTP I joint arthroplasty decreased, and since 2005 the incidence of MT-1-osteotomies has almost halved. At the same time, the incidence of MTP-1 joint arthrodesis increased by over 1000% and TMT-1 joint arthrodesis by nearly 2000%.