Assessing intraoperative pedicle screw placement accuracy using biplanar radiographs compared to three-dimensional imaging.

To date, biplanar imaging (2D) has been the method of choice for pedicle screw (PS) positioning and verified for the anteroposterior view and (spinal midline) M-line method. In recent years, the use of intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) imaging has become available with the Gertzbein-Robbins system (GRS) to assess PS breach and positioning confirmation. The aim is to determine if 2D imaging is sufficient to assess PS position in comparison to advanced 3D imaging.Retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 204 consecutive adult patients who underwent posterior thoracic and lumbar instrumented fusion for degenerative spinal surgery by a single surgeon (2019-2022).Of the 204 patients, 187 (91.6%) had intraoperative images available for analysis. A total of 1044 PS implants were used; 922 (88.3%) were robotically placed. Postoperative CT scans were verified with M-line/GRS findings. Among 103 patients (50.5%) with a total of 362 screws, (34.7%) had postoperative CT, intraoperative 3D scan, and intraoperative 2D scan for analysis. Postoperative CT findings were consistent with all GRS findings, validating that 3D imaging was accurate. Screws (1%) were falsely verified by the M-line as 3D imaging confirmed false negative or positive findings.In our series, intraoperative 3D scan was as accurate as postoperative CT scan in assessing PS breach. A significant number of PS may be falsely read as accurate on 2D imaging, that is in fact inaccurate when assessed on 3D imaging. An intraoperative post-instrumentation 3D scan may be preferable to prevent postoperative recognition of a falsely verified screw on biplanar imaging.

Is Diastasis Recti Abdominis Associated With Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a common cause of disability worldwide; multiple causes and risk factors have been proposed in the genesis of back pain. Some studies reported an association between diastasis recti abdominis (DRA), a surrogate for decreased core strength muscle, and low back pain. We aimed to investigate the relationship between DRA and LBP through a systematic review. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature of clinical studies in English literature was conducted. PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were used to conduct the search up to January 2022. The strategy included the following keywords: "Lower Back Pain" AND "Diastasis Recti" OR "Rectus abdominis" OR "abdominal wall" OR "paraspinal musculature". RESULTS: From 207 records initially found, 34 were suitable for full review. Thirteen studies were finally included in this review, with a total of 2,820 patients. Five studies found a positive association between DRA and LBP (5 of 13 = 38.5%) whereas 8 studies did not find any association between DRA and LBP (8 of 13 = 61.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Of the studies included in this systematic review, 61.5% did not find an association between DRA and LBP whereas a positive correlation was observed in 38.5% of studies included. Based on the quality of the studies included in our review, better studies are warranted to understand the association between DRA and LBP.