Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 19(11): 3068-77, 2013 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23553849

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Ganetespib is a novel inhibitor of the heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90), a chaperone protein critical to tumor growth and proliferation. In this phase II study, we evaluated the activity and tolerability of ganetespib in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were enrolled into cohort A (mutant EGFR), B (mutant KRAS), or C (no EGFR or KRAS mutations). Patients were treated with 200 mg/m(2) ganetespib by intravenous infusion once weekly for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest, until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints included objective response (ORR), duration of treatment, tolerability, median PFS, overall survival (OS), and correlative studies. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients with a median of 2 prior systemic therapies were enrolled; 98 were assigned to cohort A (n = 15), B (n = 17), or C (n = 66), with PFS rates at 16 weeks of 13.3%, 5.9%, and 19.7%, respectively. Four patients (4%) achieved partial response (PR); all had disease that harbored anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement, retrospectively detected by FISH (n = 1) or PCR-based assays (n = 3), in crizotinib-naïve patients enrolled to cohort C. Eight patients (8.1%) experienced treatment-related serious adverse events (AE); 2 of these (cardiac arrest and renal failure) resulted in death. The most common AEs were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and anorexia. CONCLUSIONS: Ganetespib monotherapy showed a manageable side effect profile as well as clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced NSCLCs, particularly in patients with tumors harboring ALK gene rearrangement.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Triazóis/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quinase do Linfoma Anaplásico , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Feminino , Rearranjo Gênico , Genótipo , Proteínas de Choque Térmico HSP90/antagonistas & inibidores , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Receptores Proteína Tirosina Quinases/genética , Resultado do Tratamento , Triazóis/administração & dosagem , Triazóis/efeitos adversos
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 28(6): 911-7, 2010 Feb 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20100966

RESUMO

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab plus taxane/carboplatin (TC) as first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicenter, open-label, phase III study enrolled 676 chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or IV NSCLC, without restrictions by histology or epidermal growth factor receptor expression. Patients were randomly assigned to cetuximab/TC or TC. TC consisted of paclitaxel (225 mg/m(2)) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)), at the investigator's discretion, and carboplatin (area under the curve = 6) on day 1 every 3 weeks for < or = six cycles; cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) on day 1, 250 mg/m(2) weekly) was administered until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival assessed by independent radiologic review committee (PFS-IRRC); overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), quality of life (QoL), and safety were key secondary end points. PFS and ORR assessed by investigators were also evaluated. Results Median PFS-IRRC was 4.40 months with cetuximab/TC versus 4.24 months with TC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.902; 95% CI, 0.761 to 1.069; P = .236). Median OS was 9.69 months with cetuximab/TC versus 8.38 months with TC (HR = 0.890; 95% CI, 0.754 to 1.051; P = .169). ORR-IRRC was 25.7% with cetuximab/TC versus 17.2% with TC (P = .007). The safety profile of this combination was manageable and consistent with its individual components. CONCLUSION The addition of cetuximab to TC did not significantly improve the primary end point, PFS-IRRC. There was significant improvement in ORR by IRRC. The difference in OS favored cetuximab but did not reach statistical significance.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Carboplatina/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/mortalidade , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Cetuximab , Docetaxel , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Prognóstico , Taxa de Sobrevida , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Lung Cancer ; 46(3): 369-75, 2004 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15541823

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the response rate (RR) and survival produced by carboplatin + gemcitabine therapy in patients with untreated extensive small cell lung cancer (ESCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment consisted of carboplatin (AUC = 5) on day 1 and gemcitabine (1100 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle for 4 planned cycles (additional cycles allowed as per treating physician). ECOG performance status 0/1/2 was 29, 58, and 13%. Median age was 66.5 years (range: 41.3-83.1), 94% were white, and 50.7% were female. RESULTS: Between August 2000 and February 2002, 69 patients with ESCLC were enrolled. All 69 patients were included in the safety analysis, and 66 patients were evaluable for response. There were 2 CR (3.0%), 26 PR (39.5%), 23 SD (34.8%), and 15 PD (22.7%) resulting in a RR of 42.5%. The median survival was 9.2 months (range: <1-22.6), and the estimated 1-year survival was 33%. The median TTP was 3.9 months (range: <1-12.8), and the estimated 6-month progression free survival was 24%. The median duration of response was 3.8 months (range: 1.0-9.9). Out of 69 patients, 29, 3, and 16 received 4, 5, and 6 cycles of therapy, respectively. The major Grade 3, 4 toxicities included neutropenia (39.1%), thrombocytopenia (31.9%), anemia (13.0%), and fatigue (4.3%). CONCLUSION: This regimen resulted in survival data that was similar to other regimens for ESCLC and treatment appeared to be well tolerated. Gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin or other active drugs in ESCLC may be worth further investigation.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Área Sob a Curva , Carboplatina/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/patologia , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Progressão da Doença , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Trombocitopenia/induzido quimicamente , Gencitabina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...