Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Health Policy ; 121(1): 9-16, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27894606

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although a wide range of health system performance indicators are commonly reported on, there has been little effort to establish their relevance to the objectives that health systems actually pursue. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify, explore and better understand health policy makers' views regarding the objectives and outcomes for their health systems, how they are prioritized, and the underlying processes that yield them to inform the development of health system efficiency measures. METHODS: A descriptive, qualitative methodology was employed using key informant interviews with 17 current and former senior health ministry officials in 8 Canadian provinces and 2 territories. KEY FINDINGS: Health ministries have clearly stated objectives for health systems focused on the achievement of health system delivery and population health goals and, increasingly, public, patient and financial accountability. Acute care objectives are routinely prioritized over population health objectives and viewed as resulting from challenges associated with difficult trade-off decisions shaped by organized interests and the media rather than explicit, evidence-based processes. CONCLUSION: This study provides insights beyond publicly available documents to explore the processes that underlie simple statements of health system objectives. Our findings suggest that despite respondents giving priority to improving individual and population health, it is more commonly portrayed as an ideal objective than as a realistic one. By understanding what lies behind statements about what health systems are striving for, we offer a more robust avenue for increasing the uptake of future studies of health system performance.


Assuntos
Pessoal Administrativo/psicologia , Atenção à Saúde , Prioridades em Saúde , Objetivos Organizacionais , Canadá , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Pesquisa Qualitativa
2.
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont) ; 23 Spec No 2010: 15-34, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21478685

RESUMO

The objective of this decision support synthesis was to identify and review published and grey literature and to conduct stakeholder interviews to (1) describe the distinguishing characteristics of clinical nurse specialist (CNS) and nurse practitioner (NP) role definitions and competencies relevant to Canadian contexts, (2) identify the key barriers and facilitators for the effective development and utilization of CNS and NP roles and (3) inform the development of evidence-based recommendations for the individual, organizational and system supports required to better integrate CNS and NP roles into the Canadian healthcare system and advance the delivery of nursing and patient care services in Canada. Four types of advanced practice nurses (APNs) were the focus: CNSs, primary healthcare nurse practitioners (PHCNPs), acute care nurse practitioners (ACNPs) and a blended CNS/NP role. We worked with a multidisciplinary, multijurisdictional advisory board that helped identify documents and key informant interviewees, develop interview questions and formulate implications from our findings. We included 468 published and unpublished English- and French-language papers in a scoping review of the literature. We conducted interviews in English and French with 62 Canadian and international key informants (APNs, healthcare administrators, policy makers, nursing regulators, educators, physicians and other team members). We conducted four focus groups with a total of 19 APNs, educators, administrators and policy makers. A multidisciplinary roundtable convened by the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation formulated evidence-informed policy and practice recommendations based on the synthesis findings. This paper forms the foundation for this special issue, which contains 10 papers summarizing different dimensions of our synthesis. Here, we summarize the synthesis methods and the recommendations formulated at the roundtable.


Assuntos
Prática Avançada de Enfermagem/métodos , Prática Avançada de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/organização & administração , Enfermeiros Clínicos/organização & administração , Profissionais de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Prática Avançada de Enfermagem/classificação , Canadá , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/classificação , Grupos Focais , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Liderança , Enfermeiros Clínicos/classificação , Profissionais de Enfermagem/classificação , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Editoração/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Healthc Pap ; 8(3): 6-14, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18493170

RESUMO

Canada's workers' compensation boards (WCBs) finance healthcare for injured and ill workers in parallel with provincial health insurance plans. Parallel systems of healthcare finance can create preferred access for some. WCBs have in recent years pursued a number of strategies to expedite or improve the quality of care for injured or ill workers, including in-house provision in WCB-owned facilities; contracting with private, for-profit clinics; contracting with publicly funded hospitals and clinics for use of facilities "off-hours"; and supporting specialized clinics within publicly funded hospitals. Many of these strategies incorporate incentive payments to physicians and facilities for treating WCB cases more quickly than patients covered by provincial plans. In this paper we document the development of these strategies and discuss their implications for physicians, patients, government and the provincial public insurance plans.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Doenças Profissionais/terapia , Indenização aos Trabalhadores/organização & administração , Canadá , Serviços Contratados/organização & administração , Administração de Instituições de Saúde , Humanos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Reembolso de Incentivo/organização & administração , Justiça Social
4.
Healthc Policy ; 3(4): 100-12, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19377332

RESUMO

The authors of this paper use a case study approach to document and analyze the interactions that arise between two healthcare payers in Canada: the provincial public healthcare insurance plans and the provincial workers' compensation boards. Through a documentary review and semi-structured key-respondent interviews, the study identified a set of policy events and decisions undertaken by each payer that had consequences for the other. These events, which included changes to governance, funding and service delivery within each system, generated interactions transmitted through the political, institutional and economic environments (primarily through competition for the same resources) and cross-system learning. The two payers currently lack a formalized process by which to consider such spillover effects and to coordinate policy between them. These interactions, and their associated consequences for both payers, raise important policy challenges and, more generally, provide insight into the dynamics of parallel systems of healthcare financing.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...