In Silico Assessment of Biomolecule Reactivity with Leachables.

Leachables in pharmaceutical products may react with biomolecule active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), for example, monoclonal antibodies (mAb), peptides, and ribonucleic acids (RNA), potentially compromising product safety and efficacy or impacting quality attributes. This investigation explored a series of in silico models to screen extractables and leachables to assess their possible reactivity with biomolecules. These in silico models were applied to collections of known leachables to identify functional and structural chemical classes likely to be flagged by these in silico approaches. Flagged leachable functional classes included antimicrobials, colorants, and film-forming agents, whereas specific chemical classes included epoxides, acrylates, and quinones. In addition, a dataset of 22 leachables with experimental data indicating their interaction with insulin glargine was used to evaluate whether one or more in silico methods are fit-for-purpose as a preliminary screen for assessing this biomolecule reactivity. Analysis of the data showed that the sensitivity of an in silico screen using multiple methodologies was 80%-90% and the specificity was 58%-92%. A workflow supporting the use of in silico methods in this field is proposed based on both the results from this assessment and best practices in the field of computational modeling and quality risk management.

Characterizing Extractables and Leachables Chemical Space to Support In Silico Toxicological Hazard Assessments.

This article describes the development of a representative dataset of extractables and leachables (E&L) from the combined Extractables and Leachables Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE) Consortium and the Product Quality Research Institute (PQRI) published datasets, representing a total of 783 chemicals. A chemical structure-based clustering of the combined dataset identified 142 distinct chemical classes with two or more chemicals across the combined dataset. The majority of these classes (105 chemical classes out of 142) contained chemicals from both datasets, whereas 8 classes contained only chemicals from the ELSIE dataset and 29 classes contain only chemicals from the PQRI dataset. This evaluation also identified classes containing chemicals that were flagged as potentially mutagenic as well as potent (strong or extreme) dermal sensitizers by in silico tools. The prevalence of alerting structures in the E&L datasets was approximately 9% (69 examples) for mutagens and 3% (25 examples) for potent sensitizers. This analysis showed that most (80%; 20 of 25) E&L predicted to be strong or extreme dermal sensitizers were also flagged as potential mutagens. Only two chemical classes, each containing three chemicals (alkyl bromides and isothiocyanates), were uniquely identified in the PQRI dataset and contained chemicals predicted to be potential mutagens and/or potent dermal sensitizers.

Injectable Combination Product Development: Facilitating Risk-Based Assessments for Efficiency and Patient Centric Outcomes.

Combination products (CPs), designated by the US Food and Drug Administration, continue to be on the rise, from the innovation of novel medicines and greater demand for injectable home and self-administration. CP qualification, its constituent parts or intended use, will depend upon the regulatory jurisdiction with reference to the product's primary mode of action. In the case of a drug product combined with a device, a consult or collaborative review process involving different Centers within the US Food and Drug Administration may be necessary. Policies and practices from different legislative branches of government will need to be merged for a single application. This presents a challenge for aligning information for the application dossier as it relates to a drug master file or drug-device CP design history file. A common objective for both pharmaceuticals and devices is to identify and evaluate patient risks to be mitigated, controlled, and managed across the drug product lifecycle. These concepts are reflected in the regulatory practices of pharmaceutical quality by design and device design controls. Early stakeholder engagement with this dynamic process between different regulatory paradigms becomes an advantage. This manuscript describes aspects for early planning for injectable drug-device development to facilitate time to market with patient centric solutions.

Evaluation of Particle Techniques for the Characterization of Subvisible Particles From Elastomeric Closure Components.

Evaluating a particle profile for parenteral drug products is a well-known challenge due to inevitable variability of results with limited accuracy to actual particle levels present in the product, especially in the subvisible particulate (SbVP) range. It is important to understand the appropriate SbVP counting/characterization technology, methodology capability, and the particle source (intrinsic or extrinsic). Elastomeric closures are prevalent in many types of drug product container closure systems and are a known source of particle contribution. These components need to be considered when establishing a drug product particle profile. In this work, we describe available particle extraction methodology and its applicability in the analysis of elastomeric closure components using multiple detection technologies. Optimum sample preparation and analytical techniques were established to evaluate submicron particle and SbVP loads from elastomeric closure components. In addition, the impact of stopper siliconization and polysorbate 80 interaction on the degree of SbVPs in the final drug product was assessed.

Assessment of Extractable Elements from Elastomers.

Compendia methods have historically been used to assess heavy metals in both drug products and packaging material extracts. However, these methods have been found to be inadequate for elemental specificity and accurate measurements. The International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) has published the Q3D, Guideline for Elemental Impurities, to provide a risk-based approach that specifies elements to be considered in a drug product risk assessment and permitted daily exposures (PDEs) depending on toxicological concern and route of administration. Consistent with these efforts, the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) withdrew the <231> Heavy Metals test procedure as of January 2018. The USP published new methods consistent with ICH Q3D risk-based approaches, <232> Elemental Impurities - Limits and <233> Elemental Impurities - Procedures. These new tests are intended for evaluation of drug products, leaving a gap in the assessment of extractable elements for packaging components. This gap prompted the need for a better understanding of the potential for elements of concern to extract from packaging materials and contribute to drug product elemental impurities. The present study investigated multiple extraction conditions coupled with modern analytical techniques to understand the capacity for elements to extract from elastomeric components. Most elements of interest, based on ICH or their potential for occurrence in elastomers, were ultimately recovered at levels below designated thresholds, allowing for correlation to PDE. These results highlight that although extractable elements from elastomeric components have the potential to contribute elemental impurities to a drug product, the actual contribution to cumulative levels would need to be calculated among all other potential sources as part of the process of elemental impurities assessment.LAY ABSTRACT: Compendia methods have historically been used to assess heavy metals in final drug products and extracts from packaging materials. However, these methods were found to provide inadequate data to address the evolving risk concerns of elemental impurities in drug products and their potential toxic effects. The International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use member countries are working toward implementing a risk-based approach that specifies elements to be considered in a drug product safety assessment and permitted daily exposures. The United States Pharmacopeia is coordinating with this goal by withdrawing the traditional procedure and replacing it with the tests that can inform safety risk assessments. However, the new tests are intended for evaluation of only final drug products, leaving a gap in the assessment of extractable elements for packaging components. The present study addressed this gap by focusing on elastomeric components used in injectable packaging systems and exploring appropriate elastomeric extraction methods coupled with modern analytical techniques to better understand the full potential for elements to extract from elastomers and contribute to the elemental impurity profile of a drug product.

Simulated Leaching (Migration) Study for a Model Container-Closure System Applicable to Parenteral and Ophthalmic Drug Products.

A simulating leaching (migration) study was performed on a model container-closure system relevant to parenteral and ophthalmic drug products. This container-closure system consisted of a linear low-density polyethylene bottle (primary container), a polypropylene cap and an elastomeric cap liner (closure), an adhesive label (labeling), and a foil overpouch (secondary container). The bottles were filled with simulating solvents (aqueous salt/acid mixture at pH 2.5, aqueous buffer at pH 9.5, and 1/1 v/v isopropanol/water), a label was affixed to the filled and capped bottles, the filled bottles were placed into the foil overpouch, and the filled and pouched units were stored either upright or inverted for up to 6 months at 40 °C. After storage, the leaching solutions were tested for leached substances using multiple complementary analytical techniques to address volatile, semi-volatile, and non-volatile organic and inorganic extractables as potential leachables.The leaching data generated supported several conclusions, including that (1) the extractables (leachables) profile revealed by a simulating leaching study can qualitatively be correlated with compositional information for materials of construction, (2) the chemical nature of both the extracting medium and the individual extractables (leachables) can markedly affect the resulting profile, and (3) while direct contact between a drug product and a system's material of construction may exacerbate the leaching of substances from that material by the drug product, direct contact is not a prerequisite for migration and leaching to occur.LAY ABSTRACT: The migration of container-related extractables from a model pharmaceutical container-closure system and into simulated drug product solutions was studied, focusing on circumstances relevant to parenteral and ophthalmic drug products. The model system was constructed specifically to address the migration of extractables from labels applied to the outside of the primary container. The study demonstrated that (1) the extractables that do migrate can be correlated to the composition of the materials used to construct the container-closure systems, (2) the extent of migration is affected by the chemical nature of the simulating solutions and the extractables themselves, and (3) even though labels may not be in direct contact with a contained solution, label-related extractables can accumulate as leachables in those solutions.

Materials in Manufacturing and Packaging Systems as Sources of Elemental Impurities in Packaged Drug Products: A Literature Review.

Elemental impurities in drug products can arise from a number of different sources and via a number of different means, including the active pharmaceutical ingredient, excipients, the vehicle, and leaching of elemental entities that are present in the drug product's manufacturing or packaging systems. Thus, knowledge about the presence, level, and likelihood of leaching of elemental entities in manufacturing and packaging systems is relevant to understanding how these systems contribute to a drug product's total elemental impurity burden. To that end, a joint team from the Extractables and Leachables Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE) Consortium and the International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) has conducted a review of the available literature on elemental entities in pharmaceutically relevant polymers and the presence of these elemental entities in material extracts and/or drug products. This review article contains the information compiled from the available body of literature and considers two questions: (1) What elemental entities are present in the relevant polymers and materials and at what levels are they present? (2) To what extent are these elemental entities leached from these materials under conditions relevant to the manufacturing and storage/distribution of solution drug products? Conclusions drawn from the compiled data are as follows: (1) Elemental entities are present in the materials used to construct packaging and manufacturing systems as these materials either contain these elemental entities as additives or are exposed to elemental entities during their production. (2) Unless the elemental entities are parts of the materials themselves (for example, SiO2 in glass) or intentionally added to the materials (for example, metal stearates in polymers), their incidental amounts in the materials are generally low. (3) When elemental entities are present in materials and systems, generally only a very small fraction of the total available amount of the entity can be leached under conditions that are relevant to packaged drug products. Thus, while sources of certain elemental impurities may be ubiquitous in the natural environment, they are not ubiquitous in materials used in pharmaceutical packaging and manufacturing systems and when they are present, they are not extensively leached under relevant conditions. The information summarized here can be utilized to aid the elemental impurity risk assessment process by providing the identities of commonly reported elements and data to support probability estimates of those becoming elemental impurities in the drug product. Furthermore, recommendations are made related to establishing elements of potential product impact for individual materials. LAY ABSTRACT: Extraneous impurities in drug products provide no therapeutic benefit and thus should be known and controlled. Elemental impurities can arise from a number of sources and by a number of means, including the leaching of elemental entities from drug product packaging and manufacturing systems. To understand the extent to which materials used in packaging systems contain elemental entities and the extent to which those entities leach into drug products to become elemental impurities, the Extractables and Leachables Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE) and International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) Consortia have jointly performed a literature review on this subject. Using the compiled information, it was concluded that while packaging materials may contain elemental entities, unless those entities are intentional parts of the materials, the amounts of those elemental entities are generally low. Furthermore, generally only a very small fraction of the total available amount of the entity can be leached under conditions that are relevant to packaged drug products. Thus, risk assessment of sources of elemental impurities in drug products that may be related to materials used in pharmaceutical packaging and manufacturing systems can utilize the information and recommendations presented here.

The Product Quality Research Institute (PQRI) Leachables and Extractables Working Group Initiatives for Parenteral and Ophthalmic Drug Product (PODP).

The Product Quality Research Institute (PQRI) is a non-profit consortium of organizations working together to generate and share timely, relevant, and impactful information that advances drug product quality and development. The collaborative activities of PQRI participants have, in the case of orally inhaled and nasal drug products (OINDPs), resulted in comprehensive and widely-accepted recommendations for leachables assessments to help ensure patient safety with respect to this class of packaged drug products. These recommendations, which include scientifically justified safety thresholds for leachables, represent a significant milestone towards establishing standardized approaches for safety qualification of leachables in OINDP. To build on the success of the OINDP effort, PQRI's Parenteral and Ophthalmic Drug Products (PODP) Leachables and Extractables Working Group was formed to extrapolate the OINDP threshold concepts and best practice recommendations to other dosage forms with high concern for interaction with packaging/delivery systems. This article considers the general aspects of leachables and their safety assessment, introduces the PODP Work Plan and initial study Protocol, discusses the laboratory studies being conducted by the PODP Chemistry Team, outlines the strategy being developed by the PODP Toxicology Team for the safety qualification of PODP leachables, and considers the issues associated with application of the safety thresholds, particularly with respect to large-volume parenterals. Lastly, the unique leachables issues associated with biologics are described. LAY ABSTRACT: The Product Quality Research Institute (PQRI) is a non-profit consortium involving industry organizations, academia, and regulatory agencies that together provide recommendations in support of regulatory guidance to advance drug product quality. The collaborative activities of the PQRI Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products Leachables and Extractables Working Group resulted in a systematic and science-based approach to identify and qualify leachables, including the concept of safety thresholds. Concepts from this widely accepted approach, formally publicized in 2006, are being extrapolated to parenteral and ophthalmic drug products. This article provides an overview of extractables and leachables in drug products and biologics and discusses the PQRI Work Plan and Protocols developed by the PQRI Parenteral and Ophthalmic Drug Products Leachables and Extractables Working Group.

Extractables characterization for five materials of construction representative of packaging systems used for parenteral and ophthalmic drug products.

Polymeric and elastomeric materials are commonly encountered in medical devices and packaging systems used to manufacture, store, deliver, and/or administer drug products. Characterizing extractables from such materials is a necessary step in establishing their suitability for use in these applications. In this study, five individual materials representative of polymers and elastomers commonly used in packaging systems and devices were extracted under conditions and with solvents that are relevant to parenteral and ophthalmic drug products (PODPs). Extraction methods included elevated temperature sealed vessel extraction, sonication, refluxing, and Soxhlet extraction. Extraction solvents included a low-pH (pH = 2.5) salt mixture, a high-pH (pH = 9.5) phosphate buffer, a 1/1 isopropanol/water mixture, isopropanol, and hexane. The resulting extracts were chemically characterized via spectroscopic and chromatographic means to establish the metal/trace element and organic extractables profiles. Additionally, the test articles themselves were tested for volatile organic substances. The results of this testing established the extractables profiles of the test articles, which are reported herein. Trends in the extractables, and their estimated concentrations, as a function of the extraction and testing methodologies are considered in the context of the use of the test article in medical applications and with respect to establishing best demonstrated practices for extractables profiling of materials used in PODP-related packaging systems and devices. LAY ABSTRACT: Plastic and rubber materials are commonly encountered in medical devices and packaging/delivery systems for drug products. Characterizing the extractables from these materials is an important part of determining that they are suitable for use. In this study, five materials representative of plastics and rubbers used in packaging and medical devices were extracted by several means, and the extracts were analytically characterized to establish each material's profile of extracted organic compounds and trace element/metals. This information was utilized to make generalizations about the appropriateness of the test methods and the appropriate use of the test materials.

Best practices for extractables and leachables in orally inhaled and nasal drug products: an overview of the PQRI recommendations.

The Product Quality Research Institute Leachables and Extractables Working Group includes pharmaceutical development scientists representing industry, government, and academia. The Working Group was created and constituted to address scientific and regulatory questions concerning the pharmaceutical development process for Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products (OINDP) related to organic extractables and leachables. This effort has resulted in the creation of a detailed "Recommendation Document", which was submitted to the U.S. FDA for consideration in September 2006. The recommendations include proposed safety and analytical thresholds for leachables and extractables, as well as detailed "best practice" recommendations for various aspects of the OINDP pharmaceutical development process, including: materials selection for OINDP container closure system components, Controlled Extraction Studies, Leachables Studies, and Routine Extractables Testing. The Working Group's processes and the detailed and comprehensive recommendations that resulted from those processes, demonstrate that the Product Quality Research Institute collaborative process can result in consensus science-based and data driven recommendations that could have a positive effect on patient care. It is anticipated that the Working Group's recommendations will also contribute to the new "Quality by Design" pharmaceutical development paradigm. This commentary summarizes the best practice recommendations within the context of an overall pharmaceutical development process.