Cost effectiveness of adherence to IDSA/ATS guidelines in elderly patients hospitalized for Community-Aquired Pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to guidelines for the treatment of hospitalized elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has been associated with improved clinical outcomes. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of adherence to guidelines for the treatment of CAP in an elderly hospitalized patient cohort. METHODS: Data from an international, multicenter observational study for patients age 65 years or older hospitalized with CAP from 2001 to 2007 were used to estimate transition probabilities for a multi-state Markov model traversing multiple health states during hospitalization for CAP. Empiric antibiotic therapy was classified as adherent, over-treated, and under-treated according to 2007 Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society IDSA/ATS guidelines. Utilities were estimated from an expert panel of active clinicians. Costs were estimated from a tertiary referral hospital and adjusted for inflation to 2013 US dollars. Costs, utilities, and transition probabilities were all modeled using probability distributions to handle their inherit uncertainty. Cost-effectiveness analysis was based on the first 14 days of hospitalization. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were analyzed separately from those admitted to the ward. Sensitivity analyses with regards to time frame (out to 30 days hospitalization), cost estimates, and willingness to pay values were performed. RESULTS: The model parameters were estimated using data from 1635 patients (1438 admitted to the ward and 197 admitted to the ICU). For the ward model, adherence to antibiotic guidelines was the dominant strategy and associated with lower costs (-$1379 and -$799) and improved quality of life compared to over- and under-treatment. In the ICU model, however, adherence to guidelines was associated with greater costs (+$13,854 and + $3461 vs. over- and under-treatment, respectively) and lower quality of life. Acceptance rates across the willingness to pay ranges evaluated were 42-48 % for guideline adherence on the ward and 61-64 % for over-treatment on the ICU. Results were robust over sensitivity analyses concerning cost and utility estimates. CONCLUSIONS: While adherence to antibiotic guidelines was the most cost-effective strategy for elderly patients hospitalized with CAP and admitted to the ward, in the ICU over-treatment of patients relative to the guidelines was the most cost-effective strategy.

Efficacy of alvimopan following bowel resection: a comparison of two dosing strategies.

BACKGROUND: Alvimopan is indicated to accelerate the time to gastrointestinal recovery following partial bowel resection with primary anastomosis. The approved dosing regimen includes an initial dose prior to surgery and 12 mg twice daily after surgery for up to 7 days; however, there are no human studies evaluating the need for the preoperative dose. We report our experience with gastrointestinal recovery when the preoperative dose is omitted. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of alvimopan therapy when the preoperative dose is not administered. METHODS: This retrospective study included elective surgery patients who underwent bowel resection with primary anastomosis without colostomy or ileostomy. The study compared (a) patients who received alvimopan and received a dose preoperatively, (b) patients who received alvimopan but did not receive a dose preoperatively, and (c) matched control patients who did not receive alvimopan. Length of stay following bowel resection, direct hospital costs, time to first bowel movement, and time to oral diet were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 50 patients who received alvimopan, 27 received the preoperative dose and 23 did not. These 50 patients were matched to similar control patients who received no alvimopan during their admission for resection. Compared with controls, time to discharge was significantly shorter in patients who received alvimopan, regardless of whether the preoperative dose was administered (P < .001) or omitted (P = .03). Patients who did not receive the preoperative dose still experienced faster time to first bowel movement (71 vs 97 hours; P = .006) and faster time to first diet (17 vs 54 hours; P < .001) than non-alvimopan users. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving the approved alvimopan dosing regimen experienced the most rapid recovery of gastrointestinal function. However, administering alvimopan only postoperatively (if the preoperative dose is omitted) may still reduce the severity of postoperative ileus.

Evaluating contemporary antibiotics as a risk factor for Clostridium difficile infection in surgical trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: With most Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) occurring after exposure to antimicrobial treatment, specific antibiotics and duration of exposure were evaluated independently for increased risk of CDI in surgical patients. METHODS: A retrospective, case-control design was used to study surgical inpatients. The case group had a positive Clostridium difficile toxin assay, whereas the control group did not. RESULTS: Four antibiotics had a risk that was statistically significant for causing CDI in surgical patients: cefepime (odds ratio [OR], 5.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-19.1; p = 0.0044), imipenem/cilastatin (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.2-8.9; p = 0.0388), piperacillin/tazobactam (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3-4.5; p = 0.0067), and vancomycin (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0-3.5; p = 0.0439). Exposure longer than 7 days to cefepime (p = 0.0006), piperacillin/tazobactam (p = 0.0021), and imipenem/cilastatin (p = 0.0171) also increased risk for development of CDI. CONCLUSION: The use of cefepime, imipenem/cilastatin, piperacillin/tazobactam, and vancomycin and the use of multiple classes of antibiotics for at least 7 days significantly increased the risk of CDI in surgical inpatients.