Comparing the efficacy of three techniques to reduce isoagglutinin titers in AB0 incompatible kidney transplant recipients.

ABO incompatible (ABOi) organ transplantation requires pre-transplant reduction of the recipient's IgG and IgM isoagglutinin titer against the donor to prevent hyperacute rejection. Over the past four years we primarily used unspecific IgG immunoadsorption (IA) for this purpose and combined this selectively with membrane filtration (IAc) to reduce IgM isoagglutinines. In patients with an initial IgG titer against donor below 1:64, plasma exchange (PE) was initiated. In this retrospective analysis covering January 2012 to August 2015 we compared how efficiently IgG and IgM isoagglutinines in a total of 22 ABOi kidney transplant recipients were reduced by either IA (n = 75 sessions), IAc (n = 14 sessions) or PE (n = 40 sessions). Median pre-treatment IgG isoagglutinin titers were 32 (4-4096) while IgM titers were 16 (1-256) respectively. Mean IgG reduction by either treatment modality was 1.3 ± 0.9 (IA), 1.8 ± 1.0 (IAc) and 2.6 ± 1.3 (PE) titer steps per session (p < 0.001 IA vs. PE; p < 0.04 PE vs. IAc). Mean IgM reduction was 0.6 ± 0.6 (IA), 1.8 ± 0.8 (IAc) and 2.4 ± 1.9 (PE) titer steps (p < 0.001 for both IA vs. PE and IA vs. IAc). Our data indicate that PE efficiently removed IgG- and IgM isoagglutinines. By processing only half the plasma volume per treatment PE was twice as effective as IA in terms of IgG-type isoagglutinin removal in our patient group. This is best explained by the presence of soluble AB0 antigens in the FFP used as plasma replacement. These advantages in efficacy have to be weighed against the potential hazards of PE. Combination of IA and plasma filtration effectively removes IgM-type and even enhances net IgG-type isoagglutinin elimination compared to IA alone. When trying to avoid PE, combined application of IA and IAc is a possible and effective way to reduce isoagglutinin titers before ABOi transplantation.

[Baroreceptor activation therapy for therapy-resistant hypertension: indications and patient selection : Recommendations of the BAT consensus group 2017]. / Barorezeptorakivierungstherapie bei therapierefraktärer Hypertonie: Indikation und Patientenselektion : Empfehlungen der BAT-Konsensusgruppe 2017.

Baroreceptor activation therapy (BAT) has been available for several years for treatment of therapy-refractory hypertension (trHTN). This procedure is currently being carried out in a limited number of centers in Germany, also with the aim of offering a high level of expertise through sufficient experience; however, a growing number of patients who are treated with BAT experience problems that treating physicians are confronted with in routine medical practice. In order to address these problems, a consensus conference was held with experts in the field of trHTN in November 2016, which summarizes the current evidence and experience as well as the problem areas in handling BAT patients.

Differences in the atherogenic risk of patients treated by lipoprotein apheresis according to their lipid pattern.

In high-risk patients who are already on a maximal lipid-lowering therapy, a lipoprotein apheresis is an important therapeutic option in preventing further progress of vascular complications as it may decrease both LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels. We looked at the occurrence of cardiovascular events before apheresis and during apheresis in three groups defined by their lipid patterns at the start of an apheresis treatment: Group 1 (LDL-C ≥ 3.4 mmol/l and Lp(a) ≤ 600 mg/l; n = 35), Group 2 (LDL-C ≤ 3.4 mmol/l and Lp(a) ≥ 600 mg/l n = 37) and Group 3 (LDL-C ≥ 3.4 mmol/l and Lp(a) ≥ 600 mg/l; n = 15). Group 2 shows a time period of about 10 years from the first event until the start of apheresis treatment (compared to 2-6 years in the other two groups). Before the start of apheresis treatment 2.1 events per patient had occurred in Group 1, 3.4 events per patient in Group 2 and 1.8 events per patient in Group 3. Under apheresis therapy just 0.9 events per patient occurred in Group 1, 0.5 in Group 2 and 0.5 in Group 3. When comparing the two years before the start of apheresis treatment with the first two years under apheresis we saw the following reduction rates of cardiovascular events: Group 1-54%; Group 2-83%; Group 3-83.5%. Our results show that the reduction of cardiovascular events due to lipoprotein apheresis is especially high in patients with elevated levels of Lp(a) compared to patients with elevated LDL-C only indicating that physicians should be more focused on the risk factor elevated Lp(a).

Factors inducing cardiovascular events in patients treated by lipoprotein apheresis.

Lipoprotein apheresis is indicated in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease due to severe hyperlipoproteinemia, which is not adequately controlled by diet and medication. This extracorporeal therapy reduces the event rate, although it does not completely abolish new events. We compared atherogenic risk factors in patients who were treated in 2009 and 2010 with lipoprotein apheresis and who suffered events (n 20) with patients who did not (n 44). Among the 45 cardiovascular events that occurred four were strokes, one was myocardial infarction, and two were bypass operations (one coronary and one peripheral). The following risk factors were found to be associated with events: male gender, coexisting diabetes/glucose intolerance and elevation of Lp(a) concentrations. In addition, the history of previous cardiovascular events, the efficiency of the lipoprotein apheresis therapy as judged by the reduction rates of LDL-C and of Lp(a), and the duration of the extracorporeal treatment (patients with events had started treatment with lipoprotein apheresis more recently) may play a role. We did not observe any influence of family history, of the underlying lipid disorder or lipid levels, of arterial hypertension or of smoking habits. Evidently, apheresis therapy of longer duration (more than two years) stabilizes the cardiovascular situation of the patients. Patients on apheresis therapy should be regularly assessed with respect to their risk factor and vascular situation. Lipoprotein apheresis therapy is important for the reduction of cardiovascular events, but optimization of additional modifiable risk factors should also be undertaken.

Current situation of lipoprotein apheresis in Saxony.

This paper summarizes the situation pertinent to treatment via lipoprotein apheresis in the federal state of Saxony, Germany in 2010. In total, 119 predominately male patients were treated in 10 centers; the majority of the patients was older than the mean age of the general population. Several risk factors were present, particularly a familial predisposition and hypertension. All patients had experienced cardiovascular events and the majority was taking statins. Patient data from the University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus in Dresden concurred with data derived from patients treated at nephrological practices. In the mean, patients attended the centers for about 6 years, the majority weekly. LDL cholesterol concentrations prior to apheresis were clearly higher than target levels; apheresis sessions decreased LDL cholesterol by 69%. Lipoprotein(a) levels could be measured in 75 patients and were effectively reduced by lipoprotein apheresis. In Saxony, 29 patients per 1 million inhabitants received lipoprotein apheresis, which is higher than the proportion of patients treated in Germany as a whole. The need for this extracorporeal treatment seems to be much greater than its current utilization. Among the patients only one homozygous patient with familial hypercholesterolemia was observed. Physicians should be actively informed about this therapeutic possibility to reduce the cardiovascular risk efficiently. The introduction of new drugs may alter the position of lipoprotein apheresis within the therapeutic spectrum.

Differential effects of lipoprotein apheresis by lipidfiltration or dextran sulfate adsorption on lipidomic profile.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: Acute modification of plasma lipidomic profile was assessed by top-down shotgun profiling on a LTQ Orbitrap hybrid mass spectrometer in 14 patients treated with two different apheresis techniques: plasma lipidfiltration (LF) and whole blood dextran sulfate adsorption (DSA). RESULTS: Patients treated with DSA revealed a significantly more pronounced reduction of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), a diminished decrease of HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG), and a similar reduction in lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) level. Against the overall tendency of reduction of lipid metabolites of all lipid classes in post-apheresis plasma, independent of apheresis technology applied, a highly significant increase of phosphatidylethanolamines (PE) in response to DSA was observed. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that DSA technology may be associated with an activation or damage of blood cells at contact surface which subsequently leads to a massive liberation of cellular and membrane PE's. Pathophysiological consequences, especially with respect to coagulation system and oxidative stress, have to be further elucidated.

Effect of thiazolidinedione treatment on proteinuria and renal hemodynamic in type 2 diabetic patients with overt nephropathy.

Proteinuria in diabetic nephropathy predicts the progressive loss of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and serves as independent predictor for mortality. We performed the present study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 00324675) to clarify whether the activation of PPARγ receptor by thiazolidinediones was able to improve proteinuria and preserve renal function in advanced diabetic nephropathy. A total of 28 type 2 diabetic patients (4 women and 24 men, mean age 66.1±9.1 years) with urinary albumin excretion >300 mg/24 h and an estimated GFR <60 ml/min were included into this prospective double blind trial to receive either rosiglitazone (RSG) 4 mg b.i.d or matching placebo (PLC) for 52 weeks in addition to their concomitant antidiabetic background therapy. At baseline and after 26 and 52 weeks, renal plasma flow (RPF) and GFR were determined before and after blockade of nitric oxide (NO) by intravenous administration of N-monomethyl-L-arginine acetate. RSG treatment resulted in a significant reduction of proteinuria (2.4±1.1; 1.2±0.6; 1.5±0.7 g/d at baseline, 26 weeks and 52 weeks; respectively, p<0.05) whereas PLC did not influence proteinuria (1.6±0.6; 1.6±0.8; 1.7±0.8 g/d). GFR and RPF did not change significantly during the study, however, RSG improved the intrarenal NO bioavailability. RSG treatment was generally well tolerated and the major adverse event - development of edema - could be controlled by dose adjustment of the study drug and diuretic agents. In conclusion, we demonstrated a possible renoprotective effect of RSG in patients with advanced diabetic nephropathy.

Role of rho-kinase in the regulation of vascular tone in hypertensive renal transplant recipients.

Activation of rho-kinase (ROK) is involved in the development of hypertension as it is a potent regulator of vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) contractility. Here we evaluated whether activation of ROK is present in hypertensive kidney transplant recipients (NTX). We tested the effect of the ROK-inhibitor fasudil on the regulation of forearm blood flow (FBF) in NTX and in healthy control subjects (CTL). In addition potential modulating effects of ROK-inhibition on local vascular nitric oxide (NO) release were studied. The effect of intra-arterial infusion of fasudil on FBF was studied by venous-occlusion plethysmography in NTX and CTL. To unmask the role of NO fasudil was infused with/without clamping of vascular NO in NTX and CTL. To unravel the basal NO-mediated tone the NO-synthase inhibitor l-NMMA was infused. Fasudil markedly but comparably increased FBF in NTX and CTL. The vascular response to fasudil was blunted during NO-clamp in CTL (104+/-18% vs. 244+/-48% for NO-clamp+fasudil vs. fasudil alone; baseline=0%, P<0.05) but not in NTX. The l-NMMA-induced vasoconstriction was impaired in NTX compared to CTL. In NTX and CTL basal vascular tone equally depends on ROK. Fasudil-induced vasodilatation is partly mediated by vascular NO in CTL but not in NTX. The greater NO-insensitive fasudil-induced increase in FBF in NTX suggests an increased ROK-mediated VSMC constrictor tone in these patients. Basal NO-mediated tone is attenuated in hypertensive NTX.

Effects of the alpha glucosidase inhibitor acarbose on endothelial function after a mixed meal in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

Endothelial dysfunction (ED) has been suggested as a possible causal link between postprandial hyperglycemia and cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Recent trials demonstrated a reduction of cardiovascular events by treatment with alpha-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose - a drug which mainly reduces postprandial glucose excursions. We were interested to know whether patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes showed postprandial ED and if so whether acarbose was able to improve this condition. Forearm blood flow (FBF) measurements for assessment of ED were performed in the fasting and postprandial state in 20 newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients and 10 healthy control subjects. After baseline examination, patients were randomly assigned to a 20-week treatment of acarbose 100 mg t.i.d or matching placebo, thereafter FBF measurements were repeated. FBF of patients in the fasting state was significantly impaired compared to healthy control subjects (max. FBF 5.3+/-0.7 vs. 8.0+/-0.9 ml/100 ml, p<0.02) and did not change in the postprandial state (max. FBF 5.6+/-0.7 ml/100 ml). In contrast, healthy controls showed a significant improvement of FBF in the postprandial state (11.5+/-1.2 ml/100 ml), which is compatible with postprandial ED in the group of patients. Twenty weeks of acarbose treatment did not affect either fasting or postprandial FBF in patients. Early type 2 diabetes is a state of both fasting and postprandial ED, which is not sensitive to acarbose treatment. Protective cardiovascular effects of acarbose might involve other mechanisms.

A single lipid apheresis does not modulate pulse wave reflection in hypercholesterolemic patients.

BACKGROUND: Lipid apheresis (LA) is instituted to increase life expectancy in patients with previous cardiovascular events and severe and otherwise untreatable hypercholesterolemia. Studies have demonstrated that even a single LA markedly improves endothelial and micro-vascular function in patients. It is unknown whether these changes also impact pulse wave reflection and established parameters of arterial stiffness. METHODS: In 20 patients on regular LA (8 treated by immunoadsorption, 7 by lipid filtration, 5 by direct adsorption of lipids) we measured peripheral blood pressure, heart rate, central systolic pressure (CSP), central pulse pressure (CPP), augmentation index (AIX) and pulse wave velocity by applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor, Atcor Medical) before and after a single treatment. RESULTS: Peripheral blood pressure and heart rate were comparable pre- and post treatment. CSP, CPP, AIX and PWV did not significantly change during LA independent of treatment modality although LDL-cholesterol levels were markedly reduced (in average from 3.5+/-0.9 to 0.9+/-0.3 mmol/L). CONCLUSION: The well-documented effects of a single LA on microvascular function are not associated with measurable changes in pulse wave reflection. Future studies are required in order to evaluate long-term effects of LA in this context.

Kidney transplantation substantially improves endothelial progenitor cell dysfunction in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) are involved in endothelial repair and maintenance. Dysfunction of EPC may contribute to accelerated arteriosclerosis in chronic kidney disease. Kidney transplantation (KTx) improves both survival and endothelial function of dialysis patients. In a prospective study, we tested to which extent KTx changes EPC biology. We studied number and function (migratory activity, adhesion to extracellular matrix proteins and to mature endothelial cells [EC]) of EPC in 20 patients during dialysis and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after KTx. Twenty-two healthy volunteers served as matched controls. Circulating precursor populations were measured by flow cytometric analysis. Cytokines relevant for EPC mobilization were monitored. Compared to the dialysis state, KTx increased the migration of EPC to approximately 2-fold. Adhesion to fibronectin and to collagen type IV was significantly increased after KTx. An improved adhesion rate of EPC to mature EC was observed. The number of EPC decreased. The amount of precursor populations showed no difference compared to the pretransplant state. Our study shows an improved function of EPC after KTx. This finding indicates an improved potential for endothelial repair which in turn may contribute to enhanced endothelial function and reduced cardiovascular morbidity after KTx.

Endothelial dysfunction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is associated with a reduced number and impaired function of endothelial progenitor cells.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality attributable to accelerated atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVE: To determine the role played by endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in the defence system against arteriosclerosis. METHODS: The number and function of EPC in 13 young patients with RA with low disease activity (DAS28 3.5 (0.3)) and 13 healthy control subjects was studied. Endothelial function was investigated by agonist-induced, endothelium dependent vasodilatation measured by the forearm blood flow technique. Migratory activity and adhesion of EPC to tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) activated mature endothelial cells and components of the extracellular matrix were tested in vitro. Putative precursor populations (CD34(+), CD34(+)/CD133(+), and CD34(+)/KDR(+) haematopoietic stem cells) were measured by flow cytometric analysis. RESULTS: Acetylcholine-induced, endothelium dependent vasodilatation was reduced by about 50% in patients with RA, indicating endothelial dysfunction, whereas endothelium-independent vasodilatation in response to glyceryl trinitrate was at control level. Significantly reduced numbers of EPC were found in the patients compared with controls. Migratory activity of EPC was decreased in patients with RA. Adhesion to mature endothelial cells after activation with TNFalpha was enhanced only in controls. The adhesion to matrix proteins and the number of putative precursor cell lineages was comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION: Endothelial dysfunction in patients with RA with low grade inflammation is associated with a reduced number and partial dysfunction of EPC. Further studies are needed to explore whether interventions that potentially ameliorate the number and function of EPC also improve endothelial function in these patients.