Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Standard of Care for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Final Analysis of the Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III LEAP-017 Study.

PURPOSE: Treatment options are limited for patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In the LEAP-017 study, we evaluate whether lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab improves outcomes compared with standard of care (SOC) in previously treated mismatch repair proficient or not microsatellite instability high (pMMR or not MSI-H) mCRC. METHODS: In this international, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, phase III study, eligible patients age 18 years and older with unresectable, pMMR or not MSI-H mCRC, that had progressed on or after, or could not tolerate, standard treatment, were randomly assigned 1:1 to lenvatinib 20 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 400 mg intravenously once every 6 weeks or investigator's choice of regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil (SOC). Randomization was stratified by presence or absence of liver metastases. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). LEAP-017 is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04776148), and has completed recruitment. RESULTS: Between April 8, 2021, and December 21, 2021, 480 patients were randomly assigned to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (n = 241) or SOC (n = 239). At final analysis (median follow-up of 18.6 months [IQR, 3.9]), median OS with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus SOC was 9.8 versus 9.3 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.02]; P = .0379; prespecified threshold P = .0214). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 58.4% (lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab) versus 42.1% (SOC) of patients. Two participants died due to treatment-related adverse events, both in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab arm. CONCLUSION: In patients with pMMR or not MSI-H mCRC that had progressed on previous therapy, there was no statistically significant improvement in OS after lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab treatment versus SOC. No new safety signals were observed.

Choosing the best systemic treatment sequence for control of tumour growth in gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs): What is the recent evidence?

Gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) represent a rare and highly heterogeneous entity with increasing incidence. Based on the results obtained from several trials performed in the last decade, various therapeutic options have been established for the treatment of patients with GEP-NETs. The options include somatostatin analogues, targeted therapies (sunitinib and everolimus), chemotherapy (with temozolomide or streptozocin-based regimens), and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. The treatment choice is influenced by various clinico-pathological factors including tumour grade and morphology, the primary mass location, hormone secretion, the volume of the disease and the rate of tumour growth, as well as patient comorbidities and performance status. In this review, the efficacy and safety of treatment options for patients with GEP-NETs is discussed and the evidence to inform the best sequence of available therapies to control tumour growth, prolong patient survival, and to lower potential toxicity, while maintaining patient quality of life is explored.

Cerebral Liposarcoma Embolus From Heart Metastasis Successfully Treated by Endovascular Extraction Followed by Cardiac Surgery.

The current case presents a patient with a tumor emboli stroke as a presenting symptom of a liposarcoma metastasis to the heart that was treated successfully with endovascular mechanical retrieval, followed by subsequent cardiac surgery. The patient is still alive, under chemotherapy treatment, 3 years following the interventions. This scenario should be considered as a part of the differential diagnosis of oncology patients presenting with new central neurological symptoms. This active approach can be an effective treatment if the patient is fit and there is no evidence of widespread disease.

Partial splenic embolization in the treatment of prolonged thrombocytopenia due to hypersplenism in metastatic cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Hypersplenism-related thrombocytopenia (HST) may delay or preclude chemotherapy. Partial splenic embolization (PSE) has been used at our center to overcome prolonged HST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2012 and April 2015, 11 PSE procedures were performed in 10 patients; 9 had metastatic colorectal cancer and 1 had widespread pancreatic cancer. PSE was performed by selective catheterization of the splenic artery followed by injection of embolic particles, ranging from 300-700 um, until a 50% reduction in the splenic parenchyma blush was achieved. RESULTS: Splenomegaly was evaluated by splenic index, mean value 970 cm3 (range, 358-2277 cm3), normal mean 120-480 cm3. Mean platelet count immediately prior to PSE was 64.5 K/UL (range, 17-104 K/UL); within 10-14 days following the procedure, it increased to 224 K/UL (range, 83-669 K/UL). Only one patient's count remained less than 100 K/UL 2 weeks after embolization. After the procedure, all patients complained of mild abdominal pain that lasted for a few days; one patient developed post-embolization syndrome. No other significant complications were observed. Mean hospital stay was 2.5 days (range, 2-5 days). Chemotherapy was resumed 7-53 days (mean, 18 days) after the procedure in nine patients. One patient did not receive chemotherapy; he underwent local treatment of liver metastasis. Prolonged thrombocytopenia recurred in four patients, one of whom was successfully retreated by PSE. CONCLUSIONS: PSE can be considered as a treatment option for HST.

The role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as a predictive biomarker of response to anti-PD1 therapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer or metastatic melanoma.

Immunotherapy plays an important role in cancer treatment. Biomarkers that can predict response, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), are in the spotlight of many studies. This cohort study was designed to evaluate the role of CD4+ and CD8+ TILs as predictive factors for response to anti PD-1 treatment in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or metastatic melanoma. We evaluated the expression of CD4+ and CD8+ TILs in tissue samples of 56 patients with metastatic NSCLC or melanoma treated with anti-PD1 immunotherapy. The study included 30 patients with melanoma and 26 with NSCLC. An association was found between CD8+/CD4+ TILs ratio and response to anti-PD1 treatment in both cancers. Regarding melanoma patients, ratios of CD8+/CD4+ lower than 2 predicted lack of response to treatment (0%) (p = 0.006), while CD8+/CD4+ ratios higher than 2.7 had an 81.3% response rate (p = 0.0001). In addition, we found that the presence of more than 1900/mm2 of CD8+ lymphocytes in the melanoma tumor predicted a 90% response to therapy. In the metastatic NSCLC group, tumors with CD8+ lymphocyte count under 886/mm2 showed low response rates (16.7%, p = 0.046). When the CD8+ lymphocyte count was in the range of 886-1899/mm2, the response rate was high (60%, p = 0.017). In CD8+/CD4+ ratios lower than 2, the response rate was low (13.3%), and in ratios higher than 2, response rates ranged between 43 and 50% (p = 0.035). The use of CD8+/CD4+ TILs ratios in tumor biopsies may predict response to anti-PD1 treatment in metastatic melanoma and NSCLC.

Long-lasting stable disease with mTOR inhibitor treatment in a patient with a perivascular epithelioid cell tumor: A case report and literature review.

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) of the small intestine is extremely rare, and there is no established treatment at the present time. In 10% of patients with PEComas, genetic alterations of tuberous sclerosis complex have been reported. These genetic alterations activate mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) in AMP-activated protein kinase and Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways, resulting in high mTOR activity. Since 2007, several cases of treatment with mTOR inhibitors in advanced PEComa have been reported. The current study presents the case of a patient with small bowel PEComa that metastasized to the brain and lungs. Following resection of the brain metastasis, the patient was treated with everolimus, a mTOR inhibitor, resulting in improvement if the patient's quality of life and a long period of stable disease. In conclusion, the use of mTOR inhibitors as a first-line treatment option in advanced PEComa patients appears to be reasonable, according to the increasing evidence from data observed from reported cases with this rare malignancy.