RESUMO
For chronic malignant and benign ureteral obstruction, the metal construction of the Resonance ureteral stent has been developed to maintain ureteral patency for up to 12 months, obviating the need for the frequent exchange required for conventional plastic ureteral stents. We report our experience placing tandem Resonance stents (TRS) in a single ureter of patients who failed management with a single Resonance stent. A retrospective review of patients who had TRS for management of ureteral obstruction between February 2014 and May 2017 was performed. Seven renal units from four patients with a median age of 62 years were managed with TRS. All but one renal unit was successfully managed with TRS initially. Hydronephrosis resolved in 80% of renal units at a median of 33 days, and creatinine reached its nadir a median of 38 days after placement, with a median improvement of 0.68 ng/mL. However, the median length of management with TRS was only 123.5 days with one exchange, and there was an overall success rate of 28.5% at 1 year. TRS placement is a feasible option for short-term management in a challenging population that would like to avoid nephrostomy and has failed other modalities.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Cryotherapy and brachytherapy are definitive local treatment options for low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer. There are both prospective and retrospective data for brachytherapy, but the use of cryotherapy has been limited primarily to single-institution retrospective studies. Currently, no published evidence has compared low-dose-rate brachytherapy versus cryotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Institutional review board approval was obtained to conduct a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients treated at our institution from 1990 to 2012. For inclusion, patients must have received a prostate cancer diagnosis and have been considered to have low- to intermediate-risk disease according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. All patients received brachytherapy or cryotherapy treatment. Disease specifics and failure details were collected for all patients. Failure was defined as prostate-specific antigen nadir +2 ng/mL. RESULTS: A total of 359 patients were analyzed. The groups comprised 50 low-risk cryotherapy (LRC), 92 intermediate-risk cryotherapy (IRC), 133 low-risk brachytherapy (LRB), and 84 intermediate-risk brachytherapy (IRB) patients. The median prostate-specific antigen follow-up periods were 85.6 months (LRC), 59.2 months (IRC), 74.9 months (LRB), and 59.8 months (IRB). The 5-year biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) rate was 57.9% in the cryotherapy group versus 89.6% in the brachytherapy group (P<.0001). The 5-year bPFS rate was 70.0% (LRC), 51.4% (IRC), 89.4% (LRB), and 89.7% (IRB). The bPFS rate was significantly different between brachytherapy and cryotherapy for low- and intermediate-risk groups (P<.05). The mean nadir temperature reached for cryotherapy patients was -35°C (range, -96°C to -6°C). Cryotherapy used a median of 2 freeze-thaw cycles (range, 2-4 freeze-thaw cycles). CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest that cryotherapy is inferior to brachytherapy for patients with low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Patient selection criteria for consideration of cryotherapy and brachytherapy are similar in terms of anesthesia candidacy. Therefore, cryotherapy would not be recommended as a first-line local therapy for this particular patient subset.