Strategies for DPYD testing prior to fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy in the US.

PURPOSE: Patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency are at high risk for severe and fatal toxicity from fluoropyrimidine (FP) chemotherapy. Pre-treatment DPYD testing is standard of care in many countries, but not the United States (US). This survey assessed pre-treatment DPYD testing approaches in the US to identify best practices for broader adoption. METHODS: From August to October 2023, a 22-item QualtricsXM survey was sent to institutions and clinicians known to conduct pre-treatment DPYD testing and broadly distributed through relevant organizations and social networks. Responses were analyzed using descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Responses from 24 unique US sites that have implemented pre-treatment DPYD testing or have a detailed implementation plan in place were analyzed. Only 33% of sites ordered DPYD testing for all FP-treated patients; at the remaining sites, patients were tested depending on disease characteristics or clinician preference. Almost 50% of sites depend on individual clinicians to remember to order testing without the assistance of electronic alerts or workflow reminders. DPYD testing was most often conducted by commercial laboratories that tested for at least the four or five DPYD variants considered clinically actionable. Approximately 90% of sites reported receiving results within 10 days of ordering. CONCLUSION: Implementing DPYD testing into routine clinical practice is feasible and requires a coordinated effort among the healthcare team. These results will be used to develop best practices for the clinical adoption of DPYD testing to prevent severe and fatal toxicity in cancer patients receiving FP chemotherapy.

Real-World Impact of an In-House Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPYD) Genotype Test on Fluoropyrimidine Dosing, Toxicities, and Hospitalizations at a Multisite Cancer Center.

PURPOSE: Fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity and mortality risk increases significantly in patients carrying certain DPYD genetic variants with standard dosing. We implemented DPYD genotyping at a multisite cancer center and evaluated its impact on dosing, toxicity, and hospitalization. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, patients receiving (reactive) or planning to receive (pretreatment) fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy were genotyped for five DPYD variants as standard practice per provider discretion. The primary end point was the proportion of variant carriers receiving fluoropyrimidine modifications. Secondary end points included mean relative dose intensity, fluoropyrimidine-related grade 3+ toxicities, and hospitalizations. Fisher's exact test compared toxicity and hospitalization rates between pretreatment carriers, reactive carriers, and wild-type patients. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with toxicity and hospitalization risk. Kaplan-Meier methods estimated time to event of first grade 3+ toxicity and hospitalization. RESULTS: Of the 757 patients who received DPYD genotyping (median age 63, 54% male, 74% White, 19% Black, 88% GI malignancy), 45 (5.9%) were heterozygous carriers. Fluoropyrimidine was modified in 93% of carriers who started treatment. In 442 patients with 3-month follow-up, 64%, 31%, and 30% of reactive carriers, pretreatment carriers, and wild-type patients had grade 3+ toxicity, respectively (P = .085); 64%, 25%, and 13% were hospitalized (P < .001). Reactive carriers had 10-fold higher odds of hospitalization compared with wild-type patients (P = .001), whereas no significant difference was noted between pretreatment carriers and wild-type patients. Time-to-event of toxicity and hospitalization were significantly different between genotype groups (P < .001), with reactive carriers having the earliest onset and highest incidence. CONCLUSION: DPYD genotyping prompted fluoropyrimidine modifications in most carriers. Pretreatment testing reduced toxicities and hospitalizations compared with reactive testing, thus normalizing the risk to that of wild-type patients, and should be considered standard practice.

Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor-related cardiotoxicity: The quest for predictive biomarkers and improved risk stratification.

Ibrutinib was the first Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). While producing durable responses and prolonging survival, roughly 20-25% of patients experience dose limiting side effects, mostly consisting of cardiovascular toxicities like severe hypertension and atrial fibrillation. While clinical predictors of BTK inhibitor-related cardiotoxicity have been proposed and may aid in risk stratification, there is no routine risk model used in clinical practice today to identify patients at highest risk. A recent study investigating genetic predictors of ibrutinib-related cardiotoxicity found that single nucleotide polymorphisms in KCNQ1 and GATA4 were significantly associated with cardiotoxic events. If replicated in larger studies, these biomarkers may improve risk stratification in combination with clinical factors. A clinicogenomic risk model may aid in identifying patients at highest risk of developing BTK inhibitor-related cardiotoxicity in which further risk mitigation strategies may be explored.

Unveiling Discrepant and Rare Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPYD) Results Using an In-House Genotyping Test: A Case Series.

Fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy is a primary component of many solid tumor treatment regimens, particularly those for gastrointestinal malignancies. Approximately one-third of patients receiving fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapies experience serious adverse effects. This risk is substantially higher in patients carrying DPYD genetic variants, which cause reduced fluoropyrimidine metabolism and inactivation (ie, dihydropyridine dehydrogenase [DPD] deficiency). Despite the known relationship between DPD deficiency and severe toxicity risk, including drug-related fatalities, pretreatment DPYD testing is not standard of care in the United States. We developed an in-house DPYD genotyping test that detects 5 clinically actionable variants associated with DPD deficiency, and genotyped 827 patients receiving fluoropyrimidines, of which 49 (6%) were identified as heterozygous carriers. We highlight 3 unique cases: (1) a patient with a false-negative result from a commercial laboratory that only tested for the c.1905 + 1G>A (*2A) variant, (2) a White patient in whom the c.557A>G variant (typically observed in people of African ancestry) was detected, and (3) a patient with the rare c.1679T>G (*13) variant. Lastly, we evaluated which DPYD variants are detected by commercial laboratories offering DPYD genotyping in the United States and found 6 of 13 (46%) did not test for all 5 variants included on our panel. We estimated that 20.4% to 81.6% of DPYD heterozygous carriers identified on our panel would have had a false-negative result if tested by 1 of these 6 laboratories. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of the diagnostic tests from these laboratories ranged from 18.4% to 79.6% and 95.1% to 98.7%, respectively. These cases underscore the importance of comprehensive DPYD genotyping to accurately identify patients with DPD deficiency who may require lower fluoropyrimidine doses to mitigate severe toxicities and hospitalizations. Clinicians should be aware of test limitations and variability in variant detection by commercial laboratories, and seek assistance by pharmacogenetic experts or available resources for test selection and result interpretation.

Pharmacogenomic insights in psychiatric care: uncovering novel actionability, allele-specific CYP2D6 copy number variation, and phenoconversion in 15,000 patients.

Pharmacogenomic testing has emerged as an aid in clinical decision making for psychiatric providers, but more data is needed regarding its utility in clinical practice and potential impact on patient care. In this cross-sectional study, we determined the real-world prevalence of pharmacogenomic actionability in patients receiving psychiatric care. Potential actionability was based on the prevalence of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 phenotypes, including CYP2D6 allele-specific copy number variations (CNVs). Combined actionability additionally incorporated CYP2D6 phenoconversion and the novel CYP2C-TG haplotype in patients with available medication data. Across 15,000 patients receiving clinical pharmacogenomic testing, 65% had potentially actionable CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 phenotypes, and phenotype assignment was impacted by CYP2D6 allele-specific CNVs in 2% of all patients. Of 4114 patients with medication data, 42% had CYP2D6 phenoconversion from drug interactions and 20% carried a novel CYP2C haplotype potentially altering actionability. A total of 87% had some form of potential actionability from genetic findings and/or phenoconversion. Genetic variation detected via next-generation sequencing led to phenotype reassignment in 22% of individuals overall (2% in CYP2D6 and 20% in CYP2C19). Ultimately, pharmacogenomic testing using next-generation sequencing identified potential actionability in most patients receiving psychiatric care. Early pharmacogenomic testing may provide actionable insights to aid clinicians in drug prescribing to optimize psychiatric care.

Recommendations for pharmacogenetic testing in clinical practice guidelines in the US.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: Pharmacogenetic testing can identify patients who may benefit from personalized drug treatment. However, clinical uptake of pharmacogenetic testing has been limited. Clinical practice guidelines recommend biomarker tests that the guideline authors deem to have demonstrated clinical utility, meaning that testing improves treatment outcomes. The objective of this narrative review is to describe the current status of pharmacogenetic testing recommendations within clinical practice guidelines in the US. SUMMARY: Guidelines were reviewed for pharmacogenetic testing recommendations for 21 gene-drug pairs that have well-established drug response associations and all of which are categorized as clinically actionable by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium. The degree of consistency within and between organizations in pharmacogenetic testing recommendations was assessed. Relatively few clinical practice guidelines that provide a pharmacogenetic testing recommendation were identified. Testing recommendations for HLA-B*57:01 before initiation of abacavir and G6PD before initiation of rasburicase, both of which are included in drug labeling, were mostly consistent across guidelines. Gene-drug pairs with at least one clinical practice guideline recommending testing or stating that testing could be considered included CYP2C19-clopidogrel, CYP2D6-codeine, CYP2D6-tramadol, CYP2B6-efavirenz, TPMT-thiopurines, and NUDT15-thiopurines. Testing recommendations for the same gene-drug pair were often inconsistent between organizations and sometimes inconsistent between different guidelines from the same organization. CONCLUSION: A standardized approach to evaluating the evidence of clinical utility for pharmacogenetic testing may increase the inclusion and consistency of pharmacogenetic testing recommendations in clinical practice guidelines, which could benefit patients and society by increasing clinical use of pharmacogenetic testing.

Pharmacogenetic and clinical risk factors for bevacizumab-related gastrointestinal hemorrhage in prostate cancer patients treated on CALGB 90401 (Alliance).

The objective of this study was to discover clinical and pharmacogenetic factors associated with bevacizumab-related gastrointestinal hemorrhage in Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance) 90401. Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer received docetaxel and prednisone ± bevacizumab. Patients were genotyped using Illumina HumanHap610-Quad and assessed using cause-specific risk for association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. In 1008 patients, grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurred in 9.5% and 3.8% of bevacizumab (n = 503) and placebo (n = 505) treated patients, respectively. Bevacizumab (P < 0.001) and age (P = 0.002) were associated with gastrointestinal hemorrhage. In 616 genetically estimated Europeans (n = 314 bevacizumab and n = 302 placebo treated patients), grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurred in 9.6% and 2.0% of patients, respectively. One SNP (rs1478947; HR 6.26; 95% CI 3.19-12.28; P = 9.40 × 10-8) surpassed Bonferroni-corrected significance. Grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal hemorrhage rate was 33.3% and 6.2% in bevacizumab-treated patients with the AA/AG and GG genotypes, versus 2.9% and 1.9% in the placebo arm, respectively. Prospective validation of these findings and functional analyses are needed to better understand the genetic contribution to treatment-related gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-induced immune thrombocytopenia: A pharmacovigilance study and systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used for a variety of cancers and are associated with a risk of developing immune-related adverse events, most commonly dermatitis, colitis, hepatitis, and pneumonitis. Immune-mediated hematologic toxicities have been reported, but are less well-described in the literature. Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a rare autoimmune, hematologic adverse event that has been reported with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational analysis of the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data. We searched for cases of ITP reported with exposure to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors from initial FDA approval for each agent to September 30, 2022. Disproportionality signal analysis was done by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR). Oxaliplatin was used as a positive control for sensitivity analysis as it is an anticancer therapy that has been associated with drug-induced ITP. A systematic review of the PubMed database was also conducted to identify published cases of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-induced ITP. RESULTS: There were 329 reports of ITP with ICIs in the FAERS database that were reviewed for a disproportionality signal, including atezolizumab (n = 27), durvalumab (n = 17), nivolumab (n = 160), and pembrolizumab (n = 125). The ROR was significant for atezolizumab (ROR 5.39, 95 % CI 3.69-7.87), avelumab (ROR 10.32, 95 % CI 4.91-21.69), durvalumab (ROR 7.91, 95 % CI 4.91-12.75), nivolumab (ROR 9.76, 95 % CI 8.34-11.43), and pembrolizumab (ROR 12.6, 95 % CI 10.55-15.06). In our systematic review, we summated 57 cases of ICI-induced ITP. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab had the most reported cases of ITP in the literature. Most cases reported (53 %) included ITP-directed therapies beyond corticosteroids for the management of ICI-induced ITP. CONCLUSION: There is a significant reporting signal of ITP with several ICI agents. Clinicians should be aware of and monitor for signs of this potentially serious adverse event.

Alpelisib-Induced Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Alpelisib is a PI3K inhibitor indicated with fulvestrant for treatment of advanced or metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, PIK3CA-mutated breast cancer. In the phase III SOLAR-1 trial, grade 3/4 hyperglycemic events were reported in 36.6% of patients receiving alpelisib-fulvestrant compared to 0.7% receiving placebo-fulvestrant. As case reports of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) have been associated with alpelisib use, the goal of this study was to characterize the FAERS reported cases of this severe adverse effect. METHODS: A retrospective disproportionality analysis was performed using the FAERS database by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) of DKA events with alpelisib from 2019 to 2022. A PubMed literature review of case reports characterizing alpelisib-induced DKA was performed. RESULTS: Pharmacovigilance database analysis revealed significance in reporting among 87 DKA cases with alpelisib (ROR 9.84, 95% confidence interval 7.3-13.2), including hospitalization and death as reported outcomes. Review of 11 published case reports reveals median onset of DKA at 14 days with successful rechallenge possible. CONCLUSION: Significant association with reporting exists between DKA and alpelisib exposure. We observed similar median time to onset of hyperglycemia between our analysis compared to that reported in SOLAR-1. Considering early onset of this toxicity, it is imperative that patients be closely monitored when initiating alpelisib. Addition of a preemptive antihyperglycemic or escalation in those previously on antihyperglycemic medications is beneficial in decreasing the severity of hyperglycemia with alpelisib. Further study investigating risk factors is warranted to better elucidate which patients require preemptive therapy.

Pharmacogenetic and clinical predictors of voriconazole concentration in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients receiving CYP2C19-guided dosing.

CYP2C19-guided voriconazole dosing reduces pharmacokinetic variability, but many patients remain subtherapeutic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of candidate genes and a novel CYP2C haplotype on voriconazole trough concentrations in patients receiving CYP2C19-guided dosing. This is a retrospective candidate gene study in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients receiving CYP2C19-guided voriconazole dosing. Patients were genotyped for ABCB1, ABCG2, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and the CYP2C haplotype. Of 185 patients, 36% were subtherapeutic (of which 79% were normal or intermediate metabolizers). In all patients, CYP2C19 (p < 0.001), age (p = 0.018), and letermovir use (p = 0.001) were associated with voriconazole concentrations. In the subset receiving 200 mg daily (non-RM/UMs), CYP2C19 (p = 0.004) and ABCG2 (p = 0.015) were associated with voriconazole concentrations; CYP2C19 (p = 0.028) and letermovir use (p = 0.001) were associated with subtherapeutic status. CYP2C19 phenotype and letermovir use were significantly associated with subtherapeutic voriconazole concentrations and may be used to improve voriconazole precision dosing, while further research is needed to clarify the role of ABCG2 in voriconazole dosing.

Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for the Prevention of Graft-vs.-Host Disease in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Guide to Management for the Advanced Practitioner.

Cyclophosphamide remains a critical component to haploidentical transplant conditioning regimens. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) emerged as an effective component of graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in the nonmyeloablative haploidentical bone marrow transplant setting. The relative ease of administration compared with ex vivo manipulations and efficacy in reducing GVHD has led to increasing PTCy use in transplant centers around the world. The role of PTCy has expanded to haploidentical transplantation with myeloablative conditioning regimens and peripheral blood progenitor cells as the donor source. Moreover, encouraging results in GVHD management have been shown with the use of PTCy alone or in combination with other immunosuppressives in the human leukocyte antigen-matched donor setting. The toxicity profile of cyclophosphamide varies extensively depending on dose, duration, overall drug exposure, and, potentially, pharmacogenetics. This review highlights the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and toxic effects of cyclophosphamide and offers practical guidance for clinical application in the post-transplant setting. We summarize data on the management of high-dose cyclophosphamide toxicities and provide insights into the pharmacogenetic implications on drug efficacy and safety data.

Genetic Predictors of Ibrutinib-related Cardiovascular Side Effects in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

PURPOSE: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treated with ibrutinib are at risk of developing cardiovascular side effects (CVSE). The molecular determinants of CVSEs have not been fully elucidated. We interrogated genetic polymorphisms in the Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) signaling pathway for their association with ibrutinib-related CVSEs. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective/prospective observational pharmacogenetic study of 50 patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed CLL who received ibrutinib at a starting daily dose of 420 mg for at least 6 months. CVSEs, primarily atrial fibrillation and hypertension, occurred in 10 patients (20%), of whom 4 discontinued therapy. DNA was isolated from buccal swabs of all 50 patients and genotyped for 40 SNPs in GATA4, SGK1, KCNQ1, KCNA4, NPPA, and SCN5A using a customized next-generation sequencing panel. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to determine genetic and clinical factors associated with the incidence of ibrutinib-related CVSEs. RESULTS: GATA4 rs804280 AA (P = 0.043), KCNQ1 rs163182 GG (P = 0.036), and KCNQ1 rs2237895 AA (P = 0.023) genotypes were univariately associated with ibrutinib-related CVSEs. On the basis of multivariate analysis, a high genetic risk score, defined as the presence of at least two of these genotypes, was associated with 11.5-fold increased odds of CVSEs (P = 0.019; 95% confidence interval, 1.79-119.73). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest possible genetic determinants of ibrutinib-related CVSEs in CLL. If replicated in a larger study, pretreatment pharmacogenetic testing for GATA4 and KCNQ1 polymorphisms may be a useful clinical tool for personalizing treatment selection for CLL and/or instituting early risk mitigation strategies.

Opioid Monitoring Using Urine Toxicology Screens in Outpatient Oncology Palliative Medicine.

PURPOSE: There is a paucity of real-world data on opioid screening and urine toxicology testing in outpatient oncology palliative medicine. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of adult patients with cancer completing ≥ one outpatient palliative medicine visit and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). Patient demographics, the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain-Short Form (SOAPP-SF), ESAS, medications, and urine toxicology screens (UTSs) were collected at baseline and follow-up visits. The primary end point was the frequency and type(s) of noncompliant UTSs (ie, presence of a nonprescribed substance or absence of a prescribed substance). Secondarily, risk factors for noncompliant UTSs were evaluated using univariate and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 189 evaluable patients (632 clinic visits), 113 underwent ≥one UTSs, 125 SOAPP-SF, and 75 had both. The median age was 56 (range, 26-80) years, 56% were female, 58% were White, 40% were Black, 48% had stage IV disease, the median baseline pain score was 7, and the median SOAPP-SF was 3. Oxycodone was the most prescribed drug (n = 125). Of 113 patients who underwent UTSs, 54% (n = 61) had ≥one noncompliant result. Thirty-nine percent (n = 44) had a total of 128 noncompliant results for the presence of a nonprescribed substance; 29% (n = 33) had a total of 53 noncompliant results for the absence of a prescribed substance. SOAPP-SF Q4 (use of illegal drugs) (odds ratio [OR], 3.61; 95% CI, 1.81 to 7.19; P < .001) and prescription with nonopioid adjuvant medications (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.12 to 7.19; P = .029) were associated with increased odds of a noncompliant UTS. CONCLUSION: More than half of the tested population had noncompliant UTS. Screening and evaluating risk factors for nonmedical opioid use is critical in oncology palliative medicine.

Use of patient-reported outcome measures for oncology drugs receiving accelerated approval.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) represent an important evaluation of health-related quality of life that has become more commonly incorporated into oncology drug clinical trials. The frequency of PRO inclusion as an endpoint in oncology drug clinical trials leading to the initial accelerated approval of a new therapy is not yet known. We conducted a cross-sectional study evaluating all new drug applications submitted to the FDA over the past 10 years (2013-2022) that led to the initial approval of an oncology drug through the accelerated approval process. The objective was to assess whether the trials leading to such an approval included PROs. Between 2013 and 2022, the FDA approved 59 unique drugs for an oncology indication via the accelerated approval pathway, and 35 (59%) included a PRO assessment in the clinical trial. A median of 1 PRO measurement was used in each trial, with 23 different types of PRO assessment tools were used across the 59 new drug applications. In summary, we found that PRO measurements are inconsistently utilized in trials leading to initial accelerated approval of oncology drugs, and there seems to be a lack of harmonization of different PRO measurement tools used across trials.

Hepatitis B reactivation in patients with multiple myeloma treated with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody-based therapies: a pharmacovigilance analysis.

BACKGROUND: Daratumumab and isatuximab are anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies indicated for the treatment of multiple myeloma. These agents can increase the risk of infectious complications, including viral infections. Cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation have been reported in the literature in patients receiving anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody-based therapies. AIM: The objective of this analysis was to determine if the association between anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody exposure and the development of hepatitis B reactivation had a detectable reporting signal in the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHOD: We conducted a post marketing pharmacovigilance analysis by querying the FAERS for reports of HBV reactivation with daratumumab or isatuximab exposure reported between 2015 and 2022. Disproportionality signal analysis was conducted by calculating reporting odds ratios (RORs). RESULTS: Sixteen cases of hepatitis B virus reactivation were reported in the FAERS database among patients receiving daratumumab or isatuximab reported between 2015 and 2022. The ROR for HBV reactivation was statistically significant for both daratumumab (ROR 4.76, 95% CI 2.76-8.22) and isatuximab (ROR 9.31, 95% CI 3.00-28.92). CONCLUSION: Overall, our analysis demonstrates a significant reporting signal for HBV reactivation with daratumumab and isatuximab.

Response to the FDA Decision Regarding DPYD Testing Prior to Fluoropyrimidine Chemotherapy.

Fluoropyrimidine (FP) chemotherapy is associated with severe, life-threatening toxicities, particularly among patients who carry deleterious germline variants in the DPYD gene. Pretreatment DPYD testing is standard of care throughout most of Europe; however, it has not been recommended in clinical practice guidelines in the United States. Due to increased risk of severe toxicity, a Citizen's Petition asked the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to update language in FP drug labels to recommend DPYD testing as part of a boxed warning and recommend FP dose reduction in patients carrying deleterious germline variants. In response, the FDA updated the capecitabine package insert to inform patients about the toxicity risk and test availability and consider DPYD testing. However, the FDA did not include a testing recommendation or requirement, or a boxed warning. Additionally, the FDA did not recommend FP dose adjustment in DPYD variant carriers. This review provides a critical assessment of the DPYD-FP pharmacogenetic association using the FDA's previously published Pharmacogenetic Pyramid, demonstrating that the evidence is compelling for recommending DPYD testing prior to FP treatment. Additionally, the FDA's stated concerns about recommending DPYD testing and DPYD-guided FP dose adjustment are addressed and discussed in the context of the FDA's other genetic testing and dose adjustment recommendations. We call on the FDA to follow our European counterparts in recommending DPYD testing and genotype-based dose adjustment to ensure patients with cancer receive safe and effective FP chemotherapy.

Pharmacogenomics in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Implications on supportive therapies and conditioning regimens.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation mortality has declined over the years, though prevention and management of treatment-related toxicities and post-transplant complications remains challenging. Applications of pharmacogenomic testing can potentially mitigate adverse drug outcomes due to interindividual variability in drug metabolism and response. This review summarizes clinical pharmacogenomic applications relevant to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, including antifungals, immunosuppressants, and supportive care management, as well as emerging pharmacogenomic evidence with conditioning regimens.

Addressing barriers to increased adoption of DPYD genotyping at a large multisite cancer center.

PURPOSE: To describe the implementation of an in-house genotyping program to detect genetic variants linked to impaired dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) metabolism at a large multisite cancer center, including barriers to implementation and mechanisms to overcome barriers to facilitate test adoption. SUMMARY: Fluoropyrimidines, including fluorouracil and capecitabine, are commonly used chemotherapy agents in the treatment of solid tumors, such as gastrointestinal cancers. DPD is encoded by the DPYD gene, and individuals classified as DPYD intermediate and poor metabolizers due to certain genetic variations in DPYD can experience reduced fluoropyrimidine clearance and an increased risk of fluoropyrimidine-related adverse events. Although pharmacogenomic guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for DPYD genotype-guided dosing, testing has not been widely adopted in the United States for numerous reasons, including limited education/awareness of clinical utility, lack of testing recommendations by oncology professional organizations, testing cost, lack of accessibility to a comprehensive in-house test and service, and prolonged test turnaround time. Based on stakeholder feedback regarding barriers to testing, we developed an in-house DPYD test and workflow to facilitate testing in multiple clinic locations at Levine Cancer Institute. Across 2 gastrointestinal oncology clinics from March 2020 through June 2022, 137 patients were genotyped, and 13 (9.5%) of those patients were heterozygous for a variant and identified as DPYD intermediate metabolizers. CONCLUSION: Implementation of DPYD genotyping at a multisite cancer center was feasible due to operationalization of workflows to overcome traditional barriers to testing and engagement from all stakeholders, including physicians, pharmacists, nurses, and laboratory personnel. Future directions to scale and sustain testing in all patients receiving a fluoropyrimidine across all Levine Cancer Institute locations include electronic medical record integration (eg, interruptive alerts), establishment of a billing infrastructure, and further refinement of workflows to improve the rate of pretreatment testing.

Integrating pharmacogenomics into precision pain management.

Studies suggest wide heterogeneity in pain management response. Improved methods of pain pharmacotherapy are urgently needed to improve clinical response and safety profile of analgesics. The study or application of how genetics influence response to medications is called pharmacogenomics (PGx). PGx testing is a tool that may support more precise selection and dosing of pain medicines. PGx guidelines exist for drug-gene interactions with high levels of evidence and can be applied in clinical practice for more precise care in patients with cancer. The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) is a publicly funded international consortium of experts who curate published PGx data and create peer-reviewed guidelines on how to translate PGx results into actionable prescribing decisions. Given the immense need to improve pain management, it is important to increase awareness and consider application of CPIC guidelines to pain management strategies. This commentary concisely describes how PGx can be used to aid in more precise applications of pain pharmacotherapy based on the CPIC guidelines.