The use of fetal bovine collagen on chronic wounds increases limb salvage: a single-center retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: As part of a quality assurance project at a large tertiary care surgical program in New York City, the effect of debridement, negative pressure wound therapy, and cellular- and tissue-based products (CTPs) on limb salvage was evaluated based on the following outcomes: freedom from amputation, wound closure, and freedom from readmission. Fetal bovine collagen was among the CTPs evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data used in this study were derived from a database of all patients who had undergone procedures involving placement of a dermal matrix at the center over a 2.5-year period (January 2016-June 2018). This retrospective analysis included 256 patients who underwent debridement and/or placement of a CTP as part of the treatment course for chronic wounds. RESULTS: Of the 252 patients identified, 34 required either minor or major all-cause amputation from the initial wound intervention, whereas for 218 patients, there were no recorded amputations through the end of the study period after the initial wound intervention. When fetal bovine collagen was evaluated as an explanatory variable to the presence of future amputation, a statistically significant relationship between the variables was found. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current data analysis indicate that a treatment algorithm that includes appropriate antibiotic therapy, tangential hydrosurgery, application of fetal bovine collagen, and a short course of negative pressure wound therapy may be a more favorable option to achieve limb salvage, freedom from readmission, and wound closure.

The Use of Cellular- and/or Tissue-Based Therapy for the Management of Pyoderma Gangrenosum: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is an uncommon inflammatory neutrophilic disorder with a spectrum of clinical presentations with variable courses. Most cases are associated with an autoimmune disorder and manifest in middle-aged adults as a painful lesion that progresses to painful necrotizing ulcers of the lower extremity. Owing to its variability, clinical diagnosis remains difficult and many patients are often misdiagnosed, with resulting delay in treatment. While early immunosuppressant therapy is key to preventing progression of PG, surgical treatment has been met with criticism because of the risk of potentiating pathergy, an exaggerated skin reaction due to trauma. This article presents a case series in which 3 patients with PG lesions underwent different treatment methods, including surgical debridement and use of fetal bovine dermis (FBD). The use of FBD in conjunction with medical treatment provided pain relief and wound coverage as well as encouraged growth of granulation tissue and long-term stability. Commercial cellular and tissue-based products used to aid in accelerating PG wound closure are also reviewed.

Hydrosurgical Debridement Use Associated With Decreased Surgical Site-Related Readmissions: A Retrospective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Debridement is the cornerstone of wound care management. It allows for the removal of fibrinous and necrotic debris from the wound bed as well as the reduction of bacterial bioburden, thus allowing for proper granulation and wound healing. Hydrosurgical debridement uses a controlled, high-pressure fluid jet to cut and remove necrotic debris, contaminants, and bacteria, thereby facilitating a potentially more aggressive debridement. OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of this system was compared with that of other methods of debridement in reducing readmissions due to surgical site infections (SSIs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify 289 unique patients treated for lower extremity wounds. All patients were treated at a vascular surgery service in a large tertiary care wound program from January 2016 to June 2018. Chart review on wound management was performed. A total of 190 of the 289 patients underwent wound debridement over the course of treatment. Logistic regression was calculated with subsequent SSI admission as the dependent variable. RESULTS: On assessing readmissions owing to SSI following debridement, use of hydrosurgical debridement was found to be associated with decreased SSI admissions (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.142-0.677; P < .05). This finding was compared with the results of either standard sharp soft tissue excisional debridement or the use of pulse irrigation. CONCLUSIONS: There are multiple options to consider when formulating an approach for wound management, including the method of debridement used. One goal of debridement is to decrease the bacterial bioburden in the wound bed to both encourage better wound healing and decrease the rate of wound infections. The present study found that the use of hydrosurgical debridement was associated with decreased SSI readmissions, which could potentially result in better wound care for the patient and possibly decreased health care costs because of a lower rate of readmissions. Further investigation of these 2 potential outcomes is necessary.

International Consensus Panel Recommendations for the Optimization of Traditional and Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the Treatment of Acute and Chronic Wounds.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, there are no international standardized guidelines or recommendations to guide the clinical decision-making process on when to initiate various negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) systems for acute and chronic wounds. Specifically, no established recommendations or guidance exists regarding the type of NPWT system to use, traditional (tNPWT) or single-use (sNPWT), and how to transition between the 2 systems. METHODS: An expert panel was convened to (1) provide recommendations to clinicians on when to consider NPWT use in acute and chronic wound management and (2) develop a practical decision-making tool to guide on the appropriateness of the different NPWT modalities (tNPWT or sNPWT) and when they should be utilized. RESULTS: The panel made recommendations and designed a clinical decision-making tool to aid the consideration for initiating NPWT and the optimal system to be utilized based on (1) therapeutic goals, (2) wound-related factors, (3) patient satisfaction and quality of life, (4) care setting-related factors, (5) economic-related factors, and (6) NPWT system-related factors. CONCLUSIONS: The panel recommendations took into consideration the clinical, operational, and financial factors in the clinical decision-making process of NPWT use to enable optimal patient and health care system outcomes.

Management of Non-Reconstructable Critical Limb Ischemia.

At least 15% of patients with critical limb ischemia are not candidates for standard revascularization. In this day and age, with new techniques-including retrograde access to the foot-and numerous angioplasty and atherectomy techniques available, the critical limb ischemia patient can still be faced without options. Distal bypass surgery may still remain the gold standard, and likely permits the patient to have the best options for healing, but carries significant comorbidities after undergoing the procedure. There are patients who do not have targets of interest in their foot for arterial revascularization and there are patients who have very poor conduit or are very poor candidates due to their medical comorbidities. Guidelines as to who should and should not undergo surgery-or even percutaneous revascularization-are starting to become more widely accepted. We are starting to see the tide change and there is interest in this cohort of patients. There are patients with no distal target that may benefit from an arteriovenous bypass, which is regaining popularity and can be done completely endovascularly. The patient that may be a very poor candidate for intervention may benefit from arterial counterpulsation therapy and/or topical oxygen therapy (which are commercially available). They may also benefit from placental stem cell injection, which is undergoing Phase II trial assessment. We will review the current literature as it surrounds these potential therapeutic interventions for patients with significant lower extremity ischemia who do not have standard revascularization options.

Managing the Diabetic Foot Ulcer: How Best Practices Fit the Real 2018 United States.

Diabetes Mellitus is a serious systemic illness that has an epidemic-like increasing prevalence in the United States, as well as the rest of the world. With the increasing number of people with diabetes comes the higher incidence of diabetes-related complications. One of these known complications, diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), has an estimated lifetime incidence of 15% in diabetics. Having a DFU increases the risk of infection, amputation, and even death, which is why prompt treatment and surveillance of such ulcers is imperative. Multiple organizations and journals have recently published best practices to heal and close DFU. Despite these guidelines, it is estimated that only 50% of all diabetic foot ulcers close within one year in the United States. To further confuse this picture, many trials include postoperative wounds that behave in a very different way than chronic wounds. The management of diabetic ulcers requires an understanding of not only the pathophysiology along with a multi-modal approach involving local wound care, pressure prevention, infection control, and, in some, revascularization, but also how care is delivered in the United States presently. In this review, we hope to elucidate the current knowledge and modalities used in ulcer management and to focus on key areas and best practices to inform the clinician, both in what they should do and what they can do.

Bridging the Radiology-Pediatrics Interaction Gap by Incorporating a PGY4 Radiology Resident into the General Pediatrics Team.

To bridge the gap between clinicians and radiologists, radiology residents rounded with inpatient pediatric medicine teams to present and interpret daily imaging studies, as well as assist with decisions and indications for radiologic exams. Surveys were sent to team members who rotated with radiology residents, and the consensus strongly favored having radiology residents on future rotations. Team members responded that they benefitted from a better understanding of radiology exams, their indications and limitations.