Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Conserv Dent ; 19(4): 364-7, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27563188

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the most suitable restorative for badly mutilated endodontically treated teeth. AIMS: To evaluate and compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with conventional nanohybrid, silorane composite with glass fibers and newer fiber-reinforced composite in mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted human maxillary premolars were selected. Fifteen intact teeth served as positive controls (Group 1). Endodontic therapy was done in the remaining 45 teeth. MOD cavities were prepared in all the teeth with standardized dimensions and were randomly divided into three groups (Group 2 - nanohybrid + glass fibers, Group 3 - silorane + glass fibers, and Group 4 - fiber-reinforced composite). Restorations were done for all groups. Fracture resistance was measured by Instron universal testing machine. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way anova test and Tukey's post hoc test. RESULTS: Highest fracture resistance was shown by intact teeth group followed by fiber-reinforced composite, nanohybrid, and silorane, respectively. Statistically Significant difference was revealed by anova test (P < 0.0001) and Tukey's post hoc test (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Among the experimental groups, fiber-reinforced composite showed the highest fracture resistance. Statistically significant difference was observed for all the groups.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...