Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surgery ; 169(6): 1323-1327, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33487432

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients who undergo colon resection for suspected diverticulitis will unexpectedly be found to have cancer. We hypothesized that a subset of variables could be used to help predict a diagnosis of cancer preoperatively. METHODS: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data (2012-2018) were used to identify all patients with a preoperative diagnosis of diverticulitis who had unexpected cancer using postoperative staging data. Key characteristics of the study groups were compared with χ2 tests and multivariate logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: A total of 17,368 patients were identified with an operative indication of acute diverticulitis. Of these, 164 (0.94%) had an unexpected postoperative diagnosis of cancer. Most cancer patients had locally advanced tumors (T1-2: 15%; T3: 39%; T4: 45%), and 37.1% had positive lymph nodes. Rates of margin positivity and inadequate lymph node harvest were 1.2% and 15.9%, respectively. In bivariate analyses, cancer patients had increased age (P < .01), decreased albumin (P < .001), and increased rates of preoperative anemia (P = .01), sepsis (P < .01), and weight loss (>10% in 6 months) (P < .001). The only variables significantly associated with cancer in multivariate regression analysis were sepsis (odds ratio 2.14, 95% confidence interval [1.3-3.6]; P < .01), weight loss (odds ratio 2.31, 95% confidence interval [1.1-4.4]; P = .01), and preoperative albumin level (odds ratio 0.64, 95% confidence [0.45-0.92]; P < .01). CONCLUSION: An unexpected postoperative diagnosis of cancer occurs in a small percentage of patients with suspected diverticulitis. Surgeons should have a high index of suspicion for cancer in patients with sepsis or malnutrition.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/diagnóstico , Doença Diverticular do Colo/diagnóstico , Doença Diverticular do Colo/cirurgia , Doença Aguda , Idade de Início , Idoso , Anemia/etiologia , Neoplasias do Colo/complicações , Doença Diverticular do Colo/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Modelos Logísticos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Desnutrição/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sepse/etiologia , Albumina Sérica/metabolismo , Redução de Peso
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 8(8): 2727-2735, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32247684

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Peanut oral immunotherapy is an effective treatment for desensitizing peanut-allergic patients, but the frequency of adverse reactions has limited its widespread use. OBJECTIVE: To review the frequency of adverse reactions that patients on peanut oral immunotherapy experience during build-up and maintenance phases and explore factors that may contribute to adverse events. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of children and adults with peanut allergy undergoing peanut oral immunotherapy at the New England Food Allergy Treatment Center in West Hartford, Conn was performed. Data on patient demographics, allergic profile, peanut allergy testing, and details of reactions in build-up and maintenance phases were collected. A systemic reaction was defined as one of the following: (1) severe reaction involving 1 system, such as generalized hives and/or angioedema; (2) 2 or more of the following symptoms: cutaneous or oral, respiratory, or gastrointestinal symptoms; (3) drop in blood pressure; or (4) need for epinephrine. RESULTS: Data were available on 783 patients aged 3.5 to 48.3 years. During buildup, 78 patients (10%) experienced at least 1 systemic reaction, 660 (84%) at least 1 gastrointestinal adverse event, 369 (47%) at least 1 cutaneous adverse event, and 157 (20%) at least 1 respiratory adverse event. Thirty-four patients (4%) required epinephrine during buildup. Six hundred ninety-seven patients (89%) completed buildup and progressed to maintenance. During maintenance, 131 patients (19%) experienced at least 1 systemic reaction, 190 (27%) at least 1 gastrointestinal adverse event, 104 (15%) at least 1 cutaneous adverse event, and 50 (7%) at least 1 respiratory adverse event. Seventy-four patients (11%) required epinephrine during maintenance. None of the adverse events required hospitalizations, and there were no mortalities. Nine patients (1%) were diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis during buildup or maintenance. Increasing pretreatment peanut specific IgE levels were associated with increased odds of a systemic reaction during buildup. Increasing age, pretreatment peanut specific IgE level, and a systemic reaction in buildup were associated with increased odds of a systemic reaction during maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: Peanut oral immunotherapy may be an effective and safe treatment for carefully selected peanut-allergic patients under the guidance of experienced providers. Specific patient characteristics and immunologic factors may help predict adverse events.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Alérgenos , Arachis , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/terapia , Prática Privada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
4.
Curr Opin Pharmacol ; 10(5): 594-600, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20817606

RESUMO

Animal models and human studies of bipolar disorder and other psychiatric disorders are becoming increasingly integrated, prompted by recent successes. Particularly for genomics, the convergence and integration of data across species, experimental modalities and technical platforms is providing a fit-to-disease way of extracting reproducible and biologically important signal, in sharp contrast to the fit-to-cohort effect, disappointing findings to date, and limited reproducibility of human genetic analyses alone. Such work in psychiatry can provide an example of how to address other genetically complex disorders, and in turn will benefit by incorporating concepts from other areas, such as cancer biology and diabetes.


Assuntos
Transtorno Bipolar/genética , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Animais , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Genômica , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...