Evaluation of two software using Bayesian methods for monitoring exposure and dosing once-daily intravenous busulfan in paediatric patients receiving haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

AIM: To assess the ability of model-based personalised dosing tools to estimate busulfan exposure (i) in comparison to clinically used intensive sampling exposure estimation procedure, (ii) using limited sampling strategies and (iii) to predict changes in busulfan clearance during busulfan treatment. METHODS: Data on intravenous busulfan dosing for patients with 4 consecutive days were entered into Bayesian forecasting software, InsightRX and NextDose. Prediction of busulfan cumulative exposure was compared to current clinical practice estimation, aiming for pre-defined individualised target of cumulative exposure. Estimation performance was tested given several limited sampling strategies. RESULTS: Thirty-two paediatric patients (0.2-16.5 years) provided a total of 103 daily exposure measurements estimated using 7 samples taken per day (full sampling), with 19 patients having sampling following all doses administered. Both software tools utilising Bayesian methods provided acceptable relative bias and precision of cumulative exposure estimations under the tested sampling scenarios. Relative bias ranged from median RE of 0.1-14.6% using InsightRX and from 3.4-7.8% using NextDose. Precision ranged from median RMSE of 0.19-0.32 mg·h·L-1 for InsightRX and 0.08-0.1 mg·h·L-1 for NextDose. A median reduction in busulfan clearance from day 1 to day 4 was observed in the clinical data (-10.9%), when using InsightRX (-18.6%) and with NextDose (-14.7%). CONCLUSION: Bayesian methods were shown to have relatively low bias and precisely estimate busulfan exposure using intensive sampling and several limited sampling strategies, which provides evidence for prospective studies to evaluate these tools in clinical practice. A trend to overestimation of exposure using Bayesian methods was observed compared to clinical practice. Reduction of busulfan clearance from day 1 to 4 of once daily dosing was confirmed and should be considered when adjusting doses.

Natural history of oral HPV infection: Longitudinal analyses in prospective cohorts from Australia.

Oral infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) is likely to underpin the rapidly rising incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma; however, there are few data describing the natural history of oral HPV infection. We recruited 704 participants aged 20 to 70 years from worksites, universities and primary care practices in Brisbane, Australia. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline, 12 and 24 months and donate four saliva samples at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months for HPV polymerase chain reaction testing and typing. We estimated the prevalence of oral HPV infection at baseline, incidence of new infections among those HPV-negative at baseline, clearance rate and persistent infections. At baseline, 10.7% of participants had oral HPV infections from 26 different HPV types. Sexual behaviours were associated with oral HPV infection, including more partners for passionate kissing (29 or more; odds ratio [OR] 3.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-8.0), and giving and receiving oral sex (16 or more; OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.6-17.7 and OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.6-18.7, respectively). Of 343 participants, HPV-free at baseline and with subsequent saliva samples, 87 (25%) acquired new infections over the 24 months. Sixty-eight of 87 people included in the clearance analysis (78%) cleared their oral HPV infections. Clearance was associated with being a nonsmoker (OR 12.7, 95% CI 1.3-122.8), and no previous diagnosis of a sexually transmitted infection (OR 6.2, 95% CI 2.0-19.9). New oral infections with HPV in this sample were not rare. Although most infections were cleared, clearance was not universal suggesting a reservoir of infection exists that might predispose to oropharyngeal carcinogenesis.