Contralateral Nodal Relapse in Well-lateralised Oral Cavity Cancers Treated Uniformly with Ipsilateral Surgery and Adjuvant Radiotherapy With or Without Concurrent Chemotherapy: a Retrospective Study.

AIMS: To evaluate the incidence and pattern of contralateral nodal relapse (CLNR), contralateral nodal relapse-free survival (CLNRFS) and risk factors predicting CLNR in well-lateralised oral cavity cancers (OCC) treated with unilateral surgery and adjuvant ipsilateral radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients of well-lateralised OCC treated between 2012 and 2017 were included. The primary endpoint was incidence of CLNR and CLNRFS. Univariable and multivariable analyses were carried out to identify potential factors predicting CLNR. RESULTS: Of the 208 eligible patients, 21 (10%) developed isolated CLNR at a median follow-up of 45 months. The incidence of CLNR was 21.3% in node-positive patients. CLNR was most common at level IB (61.9%) followed by level II. The 5-year CLNRFS and overall survival were 82.5% and 57.7%, respectively. Any positive ipsilateral lymph node (P = 0.001), two or more positive lymph nodes (P < 0.001), involvement of ipsilateral level IB (P = 0.002) or level II lymph node (P < 0.001), presence of extranodal extension (P < 0.001), lymphatic invasion (P = 0.015) and perineural invasion (P = 0.021) were significant factors for CLNR on univariable analysis. The presence of two or more positive lymph nodes (P < 0.001) was an independent prognostic factor for CLNR on multivariable analysis. CLNR increased significantly with each increasing lymph node number beyond two compared with node-negative patients. CONCLUSION: The overall incidence of isolated CLNR is low in well-lateralised OCC. Patients with two or more positive lymph nodes have a higher risk of CLNR and may be considered for elective treatment of contralateral neck.

Oral metronomic chemotherapy after definitive chemoradiation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Improving outcomes in locally advanced esophageal/GEJ squamous cell cancer (SCC) is an unmet need. We investigated the addition of oral metronomic chemotherapy (OMC) following definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized open-label integrated phase II/III study in patients with SCC of esophagus/GEJ following definitive CRT who had no radiologic evidence of progression, and no endoscopically detected disease. Randomization was 1:1 to OMC (celecoxib 200 mg twice daily and methotrexate 15 mg/m2 weekly) for 12 months or observation. The primary endpoint for the phase II portion was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and toxicity. P ≤ 0.2 for PFS was required to proceed to phase III. RESULTS: Between Jan 2016 and Dec 2019, we enrolled 151 patients for the phase II portion, 75 to OMC and 76 to observation. The tumor originated in the upper thoracic esophagus in 79% patients. Concurrent CRT consisted of median 63 Gy in a median of 35 fractions; concurrent chemotherapy was weekly paclitaxel + carboplatin in 91%. OMC was started at a median of 2.6 months (IQR 2.3-2.8) from CRT completion. Grade 3 or higher toxicities occurred in 18 patients (24%) in the OMC arm and 9 (12%) in the observation arm; P = 0.071. Median PFS was 25 months (95% CI, 17-58) in the OMC arm and was not attained [NA] (95% CI, 25-NA) in the observation arm; HR, 1.51, 95% CI, 1-2; P = 0.073. Median OS was 36 months (95% CI, 23-NA) in the OMC arm, and not attained (95% CI, NA-NA) in the observation arm; HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1-2.9; P = 0.023. CONCLUSION: Oral metronomic methotrexate and celecoxib in patients who have not progressed radiologically and have no endoscopic evidence of disease following radical CRT for locally advanced esophageal/GEJ SCC does not improve outcomes and may lower survival. [Funded by the TMC-Research Administration Council (TRAC); CHROME study (CHemoRadiotherapy followed by Oral Metronomic therapy in Esophageal cancer); ctri.nic.in number: CTRI/2015/09/006204]. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2015/09/006204.

Taxane-based Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Prospective Results from a Non-endemic Cohort.

AIMS: To report the outcomes of induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) for a large cohort of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LA-NPC) from a non-endemic region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and July 2015, 201 patients with histologically proven, non-metastatic NPC were treated with ICT followed by CTRT at our institute. All the patients received two to three cycles of a taxane-based ICT regimen. Radiotherapy was delivered using an intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique in all patients. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 37 months (range: 7-110 months), the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival of the entire cohort was 72, 85, 83 and 87.4%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, histology was an independent predictor of DFS, LRFS and overall survival, with keratinising squamous cell carcinoma histologies predicting a worse outcome. The nodal stage was an independent predictor of DFS, DMFS and overall survival. Age, gender, ethnicity, tumour stage and response to ICT did not significantly affect any of the outcomes. Grade 2 or worse subcutaneous fibrosis was seen in 19% of patients at last follow-up and grade 2 or worse xerostomia was seen in 24% of patients. Thirty-nine per cent of patients developed clinical hypothyroidism at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: ICT followed by concurrent CTRT in the IMRT era provides excellent locoregional control, distant control and overall survival rates in patients with LA-NPC. However, distant failure continues to be a problem and may require further systemic intensification.

Applying the QUARTZ Trial Results in Clinical Practice: Development of a Prognostic Model Predicting Poor Outcomes for Non-small Cell Lung Cancers with Brain Metastases.

AIMS: The role of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) has been questioned. However, no reliable criteria exist to identify patients who do not benefit from WBRT. The objective of the current study was to develop a prognostic model to identify such patients whose survival matches that of the Quality of Life after Treatment for Brain Metastases (QUARTZ) study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Outcome data of patients with NSCLC with brain metastases undergoing WBRT enrolled in a prospective observational study in a tertiary cancer centre were used to develop a prognostic model. Baseline clinico-radiological factors were used for development of the model. The model was internally validated and calibration accuracy was checked for prediction of 70 day mortality. The generated prognostic model was presented as a nomogram. RESULTS: The median overall survival of 140 patients enrolled in the study was 166 days (95% confidence interval 108-242 days). The prognostic model identified gender, Karnofsky performance status and epidermal growth factor receptor activating mutation status as significant factors influencing overall survival. The model showed a modest discriminative ability with an optimism-corrected C-index of 0.64. However, model calibration error did reveal a moderate degree of calibration error. The high-risk subgroup identified by the model had a median overall survival of 67 days (95% confidence interval 56-101 days), which was similar to that observed in the QUARTZ trial. CONCLUSION: This prognostic model derived from traditional clinico-radiological features had a modest ability to identify patients with poor prognosis who may not benefit from WBRT. However, the high-risk subgroup identified using this prognostic model had a survival similar to that observed for patients in the QUARTZ trial.

Practice Patterns and Outcomes for Pemetrexed Plus Platinum Doublet as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Adenocarcinomas of Lung: Looking Beyond the Usual Paradigm.

AIMS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is the standard of care in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) with locally advanced N2 disease. There is a scarcity of data for the pemetrexed-platinum regimen as NACT. Also, apart from N2 disease, the role of NACT in locally advanced NSCLCs for tumour downstaging is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Non-metastatic adenocarcinomas of lung treated with pemetrexed-platinum-based NACT were analysed. The patients with locoregionally advanced N2 disease and those who were borderline candidates for upfront definitive treatment were planned for NACT after discussion in a multidisciplinary clinic. In total, four cycles of 3-weekly pemetrexed and platinum were delivered in the combined neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting. A response assessment was carried out using RECIST criteria. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of 114 patients, 96 evaluable patients received NACT with pemetrexed-platinum. The most common indication for NACT was N2 disease at baseline (46.8%). The objective response rate was 36.4% (95% confidence interval 22-52%), including two complete and 32 partial responses, whereas 12.5% of patients had progressive disease on NACT. The median PFS was 14 months (95% confidence interval 10.7-17.3) and the median overall survival was 22 months (95% confidence interval 15.6-28.4) at a median follow-up of 16 months. There was a significant improvement in the overall survival of patients undergoing definitive therapy versus no definitive therapy (median overall survival 25 months [95% confidence interval 19.6-30.4] versus 12 months [95% confidence interval 3.2-20.7], respectively; P = 0.015, hazard ratio 0.56 [95% confidence interval 0.3-0.9]). Among patients who could not undergo definitive chemoradiation upfront due to dosimetric constraints (n = 34), 24 (70.6%) patients finally underwent definitive therapy after NACT. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed-platinum-based NACT seems to be an effective option and many borderline cases, where upfront definitive therapy is not feasible, may become amenable to the same after incorporation of NACT.

Comparison of paclitaxel-cetuximab chemotherapy versus metronomic chemotherapy consisting of methotrexate and celecoxib as palliative chemotherapy in head and neck cancers.

BACKGROUND: The present match pair analysis was planned to compare the efficacy of cetuximab-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy versus metronomic therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with metastatic/recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer treated with weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) and cetuximab were matched with sixty patients treated with oral metronomic chemotherapy consisting of methotrexate and celecoxib. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the cohorts were compared using log-rank test. Cox proportional regression model was used to identify independent factors affecting PFS and OS. RESULTS: The median OS was 191 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 122.2-259.8 days) in metronomic cohort and 256 days (95% CI 177.0-334.9 days) in cetuximab cohort (hazard ratio: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.35-0.95, P = 0.031). On Cox proportional hazard model, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (0-1 vs. 2) and therapy (cetuximab versus metronomic) had a statistically significant impact on OS. CONCLUSION: Cetuximab-based chemotherapy leads to a significant improvement in OS in the match pair analysis in comparison to metronomic chemotherapy.

Retrospective analysis of palliative metronomic chemotherapy in head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metronomic chemotherapy has shown promising results in selected patients of head and neck cancer in a small randomized study. This retrospective analysis was done to see whether the efficacy of metronomic chemotherapy in an unselected cohort of head and neck cancer patients is similar to that reported in the randomized study and the influence of the site and subsite of head and neck cancer on survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of head and neck cancer patients who received palliative metronomic chemotherapy between January 2013 and February 2015. The data of these patients were collected from our palliative chemotherapy database maintained in medical oncology outpatient department. The overall survival (OS) was calculated in days from the date of start of chemotherapy to the date of death. Patients who had not expired at last follow-up were censored during estimation of OS by Kaplan-Meier method. Factors affecting OS were identified by COX regression analysis. RESULTS: Over the stipulated time period, 340 patients received palliative metronomic chemotherapy. The median age of these patients was 48 years (22-90 years). The sites of tumor origin were oral cavity in 281 patients (82.6%), oropharynx in 33 patients (9.7%), larynx in seven patients (2.1%), hypopharynx in 12 patients (3.5%), and maxilla in seven patients (2.1%). Previous treatment was received by 286 patients (84.1%). The median time to failure was 3.5 months (interquartile range 2.0-6.0 months). The overall median survival was 155 days (95% confidence interval 140.2-169.8 days). Failure within 6 months of previous treatment was the most important factor influencing OS. There was a trend toward lower OS in patients with oral cancers (139 days vs. 210 days). Among the various oral cancer subsites, oral tongue primary had a lower OS. CONCLUSION: Oral metronomic chemotherapy has promising results when used in a selected cohort of patients but has dismal results in patients who failed within 6 months of previous treatment.

Development and validation of a predictive score, for identifying poor eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (performance status 3-4) advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer patients who are likely to benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: One of the ten advanced lung cancer patients presents with poor eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS). There are no clear guidelines about management of these patients. The benefit of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in this patient population remains questionable. Hence, in this study, we attempted to develop and validate a predictive score which would predict benefit from oral TKI. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study done at Tata Memorial Hospital, India. Patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer with ECOG PS 3-4 were included in this study. All these patients had received oral TKI on compassionate grounds and were followed up till death. The overall survival (OS) was calculated from date of start of TKI to date of death. R software was used for development and validation of the predictive model. RESULTS: The median survival duration of the discovery cohort and validation cohort were 170.5 and 115 days, respectively. The model predicted OS accurately, within ±2 months in 72.1% and within ±3 months in 81.7% of patients. CONCLUSION: The current model can predict OS in poor PS patients treated with TKI within a satisfactory clinical range and can be used for decision-making of these patients.

Epidermal growth factor receptor positive lung cancer: The nontrial scenario.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report the median overall survival (OS) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive patients who were managed out of a clinical trial. METHODS: Nonsmall cell lung cancer patients harboring activating EGFR mutations who were either ineligible or refused participation in a clinical trial were selected for this analysis. The reason for not participating in trial, staging, treatment, and outcome details were obtained from a prospective lung cancer database. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS. Log-rank test and Cox proportion hazard model were used for univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively. RESULTS: We included 225 patients in this analysis. The median age of the cohort was 56 years (range 29-85 years). A compromised Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of >2 was the major reason (83 patients, 36.9%) for ineligibility of patients in a clinical trial. The major reason provided by eligible patients for refusal to participate in a clinical trial was long distance of travel and inability to comply with the study-mandated follow-up visits (65 patients, 28.9%). The median OS in patients with PS 0-2 was 18.17 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.6-20.8 months) and it was 12.1 months (95% CI: 9.0-15.2 months) in patients with PS 3-4 (hazard ratio - 0.579 [95% CI: 0.398-0.843] P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: EGFR positive patients who were ineligible for a clinical trial due to poor PS had lower survival; however, patients with good PS treated off-trial had similar OS to that reported in multiple clinical trials.

Repeat biopsy in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: Feasibility, limitations, and clinical utility in Indian patients.

INTRODUCTION: The feasibility and success rate of repeat biopsy for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancers that have progressed on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are varied and merits further assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: EGFR mutation-positive lung cancers were offered repeat biopsy upon progression on TKIs. Two groups of patients, first one on a clinical trial and second one from a database, were included for analysis. The feasibility to perform a repeat biopsy was analyzed in the first group. Success rate of biopsy and tissue adequacy for molecular testing was analyzed in both groups. Descriptive statistics were used for analyzing the demography, EGFR mutation type, tissue adequacy, and molecular profile at repeat biopsy. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess normality of data. Two sample t-tests were used for comparison of proportions. RESULTS: The feasibility of undergoing repeat biopsy was 77% (95% confidence interval [CI] of 69.4%-83.5%) in the first group (114/148 patients). Feasibility was not analyzed in the second group of patients. Out of 196 patients who underwent a repeat biopsy, 154 patients (78.6%; 95% CI: 72.2%-84.1%) had tumor tissue adequate for performing molecular testing. 27/196 (13.8%) patients did not have any evidence of malignancy on repeat biopsy whereas 15/196 (7.6%) patients had scanty tissue on repeat biopsy prohibiting molecular testing. Six patients (3.06%; 95% CI: 1.1%-6.5%) had small cell transformation. T790M mutation was detected in 12 out of the 42 patients (28.6%; 95% CI: 15.7-44.6) in whom EGFR testing was performed on repeat biopsy specimen. CONCLUSION: Repeat biopsy was able to provide adequate tissue acquisition in only two-thirds of the patients. Liquid biopsy represents an important tool to bridge this gap.

Rechallenge temozolomide in glioma: A case series from India.

INTRODUCTION: Temozolomide (TMZ) is an integral part of upfront treatment of high-grade gliomas. It is administered postsurgery as concurrent therapy with radiation and subsequently as adjuvant chemotherapy for 6-12 cycles. It is unknown whether rechallenge of salvage TMZ in previously treated high-grade glioma has any efficacy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients treated with salvage rechallenged TMZ between January 2015 and August 2016 were included for this retrospective analysis. SPSS version 20 was used for this analysis. Time to event analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated. The maximum grade of toxicity was noted in accordance with CTCAE version 4.02. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were selected for analysis with the median age being 43 years (range: 26-69 years). The tumor histopathology at baseline was astrocytoma Grade 2 in 1 patient, oligodendroglioma Grade 2 in 3 patients, anaplastic astrocytoma in 7 patients, anaplastic oligodendroglioma in 2 patients, and glioblastoma in 10 patients. All of them had previously received TMZ. The median numbers of previous TMZ cycles received were 6 (4-18). The median time to failure postlast treatment was 24 months (5-72 months). The median number of cycles of rechallenged salvage TMZ administered was 6 cycles (range: 1-18). Grade 3-4 myelosuppression was seen in 3 patients (13.4%). The median PFS was 459 days (95% confidence interval: 212.1-705.9). The median OS was 25 months. Six-month OS and 1-year OS were 81.4% and 75.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Rechallenge with TMZ in recurrent glioma that had previously responded to TMZ is associated with improvement in PFS and OS and has a sufficiently long disease-free interval.