Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide is a structural analogue of thalidomide with similar but more potent biologic activity. This phase 3, placebo-controlled trial investigated the efficacy of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. METHODS: Of 351 patients who had received at least one previous antimyeloma therapy, 176 were randomly assigned to receive 25 mg of oral lenalidomide and 175 to receive placebo on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle. In addition, all patients received 40 mg of oral dexamethasone on days 1 to 4, 9 to 12, and 17 to 20 for the first four cycles and subsequently, after the fourth cycle, only on days 1 to 4. Patients continued in the study until the occurrence of disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. The primary end point was time to progression. RESULTS: The time to progression was significantly longer in the patients who received lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (lenalidomide group) than in those who received placebo plus dexamethasone (placebo group) (median, 11.3 months vs. 4.7 months; P<0.001). A complete or partial response occurred in 106 patients in the lenalidomide group (60.2%) and in 42 patients in the placebo group (24.0%, P<0.001), with a complete response in 15.9% and 3.4% of patients, respectively (P<0.001). Overall survival was significantly improved in the lenalidomide group (hazard ratio for death, 0.66; P=0.03). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events that occurred in more than 10% of patients in the lenalidomide group were neutropenia (29.5%, vs. 2.3% in the placebo group), thrombocytopenia (11.4% vs. 5.7%), and venous thromboembolism (11.4% vs. 4.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is more effective than high-dose dexamethasone alone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00424047 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma in North America.

BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide, an oral immunomodulatory drug that is similar to thalidomide but has a different safety profile, has clinical activity in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. METHODS: Patients in the United States and Canada who had received at least one previous therapy for multiple myeloma but who required additional treatment were randomly assigned to receive either 25 mg of lenalidomide or placebo on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle. Both groups also received 40 mg of oral dexamethasone on days 1 to 4, 9 to 12, and 17 to 20 for the first four cycles. After the fourth cycle, 40 mg of dexamethasone was administered only on days 1 to 4. Safety, clinical response, time to progression, and overall survival were assessed. RESULTS: We assigned 177 patients to the lenalidomide group and 176 to the placebo group. Complete, near-complete, or partial responses occurred in 108 patients (61.0%) in the lenalidomide group and in 35 patients (19.9%) in the placebo group (P<0.001); complete responses occurred in 14.1% and 0.6%, respectively (P<0.001). The median time to progression was 11.1 months in the lenalidomide group and 4.7 months in the placebo group (P<0.001). Median overall survival times in the two groups were 29.6 months and 20.2 months, respectively (P<0.001). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 85.3% of the lenalidomide group and in 73.1% of the placebo group; these events resulted in study discontinuation in 19.8% and 10.2%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and venous thromboembolism were more common in the lenalidomide group than in the placebo group (41.2% vs. 4.6% and 14.7% vs. 3.4%, respectively; P<0.001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is superior to placebo plus dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00056160 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion.

BACKGROUND: Severe, often refractory anemia is characteristic of the myelodysplastic syndrome associated with chromosome 5q31 deletion. We investigated whether lenalidomide (CC5013) could reduce the transfusion requirement and suppress the abnormal 5q31- clone in patients with this disorder. METHODS: One hundred forty-eight patients received 10 mg of lenalidomide for 21 days every 4 weeks or daily. Hematologic, bone marrow, and cytogenetic changes were assessed after 24 weeks of treatment by an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Among the 148 patients, 112 had a reduced need for transfusions (76%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 68 to 82) and 99 patients (67%; 95% CI, 59 to 74) no longer required transfusions, regardless of the karyotype complexity. The response to lenalidomide was rapid (median time to response, 4.6 weeks; range, 1 to 49) and sustained; the median duration of transfusion independence had not been reached after a median of 104 weeks of follow-up. The maximum hemoglobin concentration reached a median of 13.4 g per deciliter (range, 9.2 to 18.6), with a corresponding median rise of 5.4 g per deciliter (range, 1.1 to 11.4), as compared with the baseline nadir value before transfusion. Among 85 patients who could be evaluated, 62 had cytogenetic improvement, and 38 of the 62 had a complete cytogenetic remission. There was complete resolution of cytologic abnormalities in 38 of 106 patients whose serial bone marrow samples could be evaluated. Moderate-to-severe neutropenia (in 55% of patients) and thrombocytopenia (in 44%) were the most common reasons for interrupting treatment or adjusting the dose of lenalidomide. CONCLUSIONS: Lenalidomide can reduce transfusion requirements and reverse cytologic and cytogenetic abnormalities in patients who have the myelodysplastic syndrome with the 5q31 deletion. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00065156 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

A post hoc analysis of d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride (focalin) versus d,l-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride (ritalin).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical measures of the benefit/risk ratio in a post hoc analysis of a clinical trial of d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride (d-MPH) and d,l-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride (d,l-MPH). METHOD: Data from a phase III clinical trial was used to compare equimolar doses of d-MPH and d,l-MPH treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on clinician ratings of improvement/deterioration, teacher ratings of remission, and duration of action. RESULTS: d-MPH was clinically and statistically significantly superior to d,l-MPH on clinician's dimensional ratings of global improvement, teacher ratings of remission of ADHD symptoms and parent 6:00 p.m. ADHD symptom ratings. No treatment differences were observed for symptom ratings at 3:00 p.m. and for 6:00 p.m. math test performance. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the two drugs may have distinct profiles on the measures analyzed. Because d-MPH may have be more than twice the potency of d,l-MPH, the differences reported here are only applicable to the doses of the study drugs involved in the clinical trial. The results are limited by the exploratory nature of our analysis, small samples, and multiple analyses. The findings are suggestive that further study is warranted to look at these differences prospectively but cannot be used to draw clinical conclusions at this time.

Thalidomide for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma after high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation: results of an open-label multicenter phase 2 study of efficacy, toxicity, and biological activity.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the progression-free survival at 12 weeks, to evaluate the toxic effects, and to analyze the biological activity of thalidomide in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) after high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1999 to 2001, we performed a multicenter prospective phase 2 study in patients with MM that relapsed after high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation to evaluate the efficacy of oral thalidomide, with dose escalation from 200 to 600 mg/d over 12 weeks and a subsequent maintenance phase of 200 mg/d for up to 1 year. Outcome was correlated with serum and plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1, interferon gamma, interleukin (IL) 2, and IL-6 during treatment. RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated (19 men and 11 women; median age, 58 years). The median number of prior therapies was 5, and the median duration from diagnosis of MM to study enrollment was 4.3 years. The 12-week progression-free survival rate was 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48%-86%). The observed response rate (partial response plus minor response) was 43% (95% CI, 28%-60%) with a median duration of 6 months. Attributable toxicities included constipation, fatigue, rash, and neuropathy, which was dose limiting in 8 patients (27%). Dose escalation from 200 to 600 mg/d was achieved in 50% of patients. Although responses were observed with lower doses, possibly eliminating the need to escalate the dose, responses were also seen in patients who completed the dose escalation. Some patients had disease progression while receiving the maintenance dose of 200 mg/d. Analysis of biomarker assays did not identify any biomarker associated with greater response, but a significant increase in levels of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1, IL-2, and interferon gamma was seen with thalidomide therapy. CONCLUSION: The optimal thalidomide dose varies, and adverse effects can be dose limiting. The dose of thalidomide therapy should be based on the individual patient to ensure that it is well tolerated and that a response is achieved.

Open-label study of dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

BACKGROUND: This pilot study examined the efficacy and duration of the effect of dexmethylphenidate (d-MPH) given once-daily in subjects with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: Subjects aged 6-18 years (inclusive) with ADHD were enrolled in this 8-week, openlabel study. Outcome measures included the Conners'Teacher and Parent Rating Scales, the Attention Deficit Disorder Rating Scale (ADDRS), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale, and teacher and parent visual analog scales to estimate the duration of efficacy. d-MPH was initiated at a dose of 2.5 mg/day. The dose was flexible, based on response and tolerability, and could be increased in increments of 2.5 mg/day to a maximum daily dose of 30 mg/day. RESULTS: Twenty-two subjects (mean age, 8.7 +/- 0.4 years) were treated. Significant improvements (p <0.0001) from baseline occurred in the Conners' Teacher and Parent Rating Scales after 8 weeks. Of the evaluated subjects, 85.7% (18 of 21) showed at least a 30% improvement from baseline on the Conners' Teacher Rating Scale, and 86.4% (19 of 22) of subjects showed at least a 30% improvement from baseline on the Conners' Parent Rating Scale. Most subjects demonstrated an improvement on the ADDRS and the CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. Median duration of effect was estimated at 6.2 hours (teachers) and at 7.5 hours (parents). On average, patients gained 2.4 pounds over the course of the study. CONCLUSIONS: A single daily dose of d-MPH was effective in controlling ADHD in children and was well tolerated. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and to evaluate chronic dosing with d-MPH.