Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
PLoS One ; 19(1): e0292013, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38271326

RESUMO

AIM: Radiation-induced fibrosis is a recognised consequence of radiotherapy, especially after multiple and prolonged dosing regimens. There is no definitive treatment for late-stage radiation-induced fibrosis, although the use of autologous fat transfer has shown promise. However, the exact mechanisms by which this improves radiation-induced fibrosis remain poorly understood. We aim to explore existing literature on the effects of autologous fat transfer on both in-vitro and in-vivo radiation-induced fibrosis models, and to collate potential mechanisms of action. METHOD: PubMed, Cochrane reviews and Scopus electronic databases from inception to May 2023 were searched. Our search strategy combined both free-text terms with Boolean operators, derived from synonyms of adipose tissue and radiation-induced fibrosis. RESULTS: The search strategy produced 2909 articles. Of these, 90 underwent full-text review for eligibility, yielding 31 for final analysis. Nine conducted in-vitro experiments utilising a co-culture model, whilst 25 conducted in-vivo experiments. Interventions under autologous fat transfer included adipose-derived stem cells, stromal vascular function, whole fat and microfat. Notable findings include downregulation of fibroblast proliferation, collagen deposition, epithelial cell apoptosis, and proinflammatory processes. Autologous fat transfer suppressed hypoxia and pro-inflammatory interferon-γ signalling pathways, and tissue treated with adipose-derived stem cells stained strongly for anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages. Although largely proangiogenic initially, studies show varying effects on vascularisation. There is early evidence that adipose-derived stem cell subgroups may have different functional properties. CONCLUSION: Autologous fat transfer functions through pro-angiogenic, anti-fibrotic, immunomodulatory, and extracellular matrix remodelling properties. By characterising these mechanisms, relevant drug targets can be identified and used to further improve clinical outcomes in radiation-induced fibrosis. Further research should focus on adipose-derived stem cell sub-populations and augmentation techniques such as cell-assisted lipotransfer.


Assuntos
Tecido Adiposo , Síndrome da Fibrose por Radiação , Humanos , Adipócitos/fisiologia , Transplante Autólogo , Fibrose
3.
J Occup Health ; 62(1): e12175, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33131192

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic has subjected healthcare workers (HCWs) to high risk of infection through direct workplace exposure, coupled with increased workload and psychological stress. This review aims to determine the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on mental health outcomes of hospital-based HCWs and formulate recommendations for future action. METHODS: A systematic review was performed between 31st December 2019 and 17th June 2020 through Ovid Medline and Embase databases (PROSPERO ID CRD42020181204). Studies were included for review if they investigated the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on mental health outcomes of hospital-based HCWs and used validated psychiatric scoring tools. Prevalence of ICD-10 classified psychiatric disorders was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: The initial search returned 436 articles. Forty-four studies were included in final analysis, with a total of 69,499 subjects. Prevalence ranges of six mental health outcomes were identified: depression 13.5%-44.7%; anxiety 12.3%-35.6%; acute stress reaction 5.2%-32.9%; post-traumatic stress disorder 7.4%-37.4%; insomnia 33.8%-36.1%; and occupational burnout 3.1%-43.0%. Direct exposure to SARS-CoV-2 patients was the most common risk factor identified for all mental health outcomes except occupational burnout. Nurses, frontline HCWs, and HCWs with low social support and fewer years of working experience reported the worst outcomes. CONCLUSION: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has significantly impacted the mental health of HCWs. Frontline staff demonstrate worse mental health outcomes. Hospitals should be staffed to meet service provision requirements and to mitigate the impact onmental health. This can be improved with access to rapid-response psychiatric teams and should be continually monitored throughout the pandemic and beyond its conclusion.


Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Saúde Ocupacional , Estresse Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Ansiedade/epidemiologia , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Prevalência , Medição de Risco , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...