Paramedic utilization of Vision, Aphasia, Neglect (VAN) stroke severity scale in the prehospital setting predicts emergent large vessel occlusion stroke.

BACKGROUND: Numerous stroke severity scales have been published, but few have been studied with emergency medical services (EMS) in the prehospital setting. We studied the Vision, Aphasia, Neglect (VAN) stroke assessment scale in the prehospital setting for its simplicity to both teach and perform. This prospective prehospital cohort study was designed to validate the use and efficacy of VAN within our stroke systems of care, which includes multiple comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) and EMS agencies. METHODS: The performances of VAN and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥6 for the presence of both emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) alone and ELVO or any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) combined were reported with positive predictive value, sensitivity, negative predictive value, specificity, and overall accuracy. For subjects with intraparenchymal hemorrhage, volume was calculated based on the ABC/2 formula and the presence of intraventricular hemorrhage was recorded. RESULTS: Both VAN and NIHSS ≥6 were significantly associated with ELVO alone and with ELVO or any ICH combined using χ2 analysis. Overall, hospital NIHSS ≥6 performed better than prehospital VAN based on statistical measures. Of the 34 cases of intraparenchymal hemorrhage, mean±SD hemorrhage volumes were 2.5±4.0 mL for the five VAN-negative cases and 17.5±14.2 mL for the 29 VAN-positive cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our VAN study adds to the published evidence that prehospital EMS scales can be effectively taught and implemented in stroke systems with multiple EMS agencies and CSCs. In addition to ELVO, prehospital scales such as VAN may also serve as an effective ICH bypass tool.

Opportunities and challenges in secondary stroke prevention: a mixed methods study.

Purpose: To describe control of risk factors after stroke from the perspectives of the stroke survivor, the family, and healthcare professionals.Materials and methods: A mixed methods design was used, undertaken in two phases: i) qualitative study using focus group methodology to explore secondary stroke prevention and ii) survey of stroke survivors about use of technology and self-management of blood pressure (BP).Results: From the eight focus groups (n = 33), three themes were identified: i) stroke is a wake-up call to do the right things; ii) challenges to doing the right things; and iii) role of technology in helping you to do the right things. Among survey respondents (n = 82), most participants reported mobile phone ownership (93%), mostly smartphones (66%), and >80% identified a greater role for technology in supporting management of risk factors. Participants who reported monitoring BP at home were significantly more likely to know their target BP than those not monitoring at home (83 vs. 42%; p < 0.001) and more adherent with medications (78 vs. 52%; p = 0.016).Conclusions: These findings highlight the ongoing challenges with achieving risk factor control after stroke and the potential to utilise health information technology to engage stroke survivors in self-management of their risk factors.Implications for rehabilitationClinicians should be knowledgeable of the challenges that stroke survivors face in managing their risk factors after stroke and the role that they can play in providing tailored education.BP continues to be poorly controlled after stroke and there is opportunity for improvement.Stroke survivors and their families are receptive to using health information technology to support their risk factor control.Rehabilitation clinicians have an opportunity to incorporate different aspects of health information technology into their practice to support self-management of risk factors.

Older Stroke Patients with High Stroke Scores Have Delayed Door-To-Needle Times.

INTRODUCTION: The timely administration of intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) to acute ischemic stroke patients from the period of symptom presentation to treatment, door-to-needle (DTN) time, is an important focus for quality improvement and best clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective review of our Get With The Guidelines database was performed for a 5-hospital telestroke network for the period between January 2010 and January 2015. All acute ischemic stroke patients who were triaged in the emergency departments connected to the telestroke network and received IV t-PA were included. Optimal DTN time was defined as less than 60 minutes. Logistic regression was performed with clinical variables associated with DTN time. Age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score were categorized based on clinically significant cutoffs. RESULTS: Six-hundred and fifty-two patients (51% women, 46% White, 45% Hispanic, and 8% Black) were included in this study. The mean age was 70 years (range 29-98). Of the variables analyzed, only arrival mode, initial NIHSS score, and the interaction between age and initial NIHSS score were significant. DTN time more than or equal to 60 minutes was most common in patients aged more than 80 years with NIHSS score higher than 10. CONCLUSIONS: The cause of DTN time delay for older patients with higher NIHSS score is unclear but was not related to presenting blood pressure or arrival mode. Further study of this subgroup is important to reduce overall DTN times.

Meeting the challenge of assessing clinical competence of occupational therapists within a program management environment.

BACKGROUND: Program management models have raised concerns among occupational therapists about professional standards related to clinical competence, performance review procedures, and quality improvement initiatives. PURPOSE: This paper describes how a chart-stimulated recall (CSR) peer-review process and interview tool was revised, implemented, and evaluated as a pilot project to assess the clinical competence of occupational therapy staff at a large urban health centre in southern Ontario. METHODS: Fourteen pairs (n=28) of occupational therapists representing various practice areas participated in this project. Half served as peer assessors and half as interviewees. Peer assessors conducted an independent chart review followed by a one-hour personal interview with a peer partner to discuss clinical management issues related to the client cases. Each interviewer rated his or her partner's clinical competence in eight areas of performance using a 7-point Likert scale. FINDINGS: Results indicated that the CSR tool could discriminate among occupational therapists in terms of overall levels of clinical competence and also identify specific areas of concern that could be targeted for professional development. Feedback from participants was positive. CONCLUSIONS: The CSR tool was found to be useful for assessing clinical competence of occupational therapists in this large health centre as a quality improvement initiative within that discipline group. Further research is needed to establish the reliability and validity of the CSR tool.