Radiologically Inserted Gastrostomy Tube Placement Guided by the Assessment and Primary Palliative Care Provided by an Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Multidisciplinary Clinic: A Single-Arm Retrospective Clinical Study.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease with a median survival of about 3 years. An ALS multidisciplinary team can provide primary palliative care and improve outcomes and quality of life for patients. Feeding tube insertion may be considered for patients with significant weight loss, or respiratory insufficiency. While radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) tube placement may be an option, further studies are required to determine its best timing and appropriateness. This study's objectives were to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of RIG tube placement in ALS patients over a 90-day follow-up period through the assessment and primary palliative care provided by the multidisciplinary team. This retrospective study reviewed the placement of 16 or 18 French RIG-tube without intubation or endoscopy for 36 ALS patients at a single center between April 2019 and December 2021. Measures included ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores to determine the ALS stage. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and follow-up data were reviewed. Results showed that the RIG tube placement had a low rate of minor adverse events (11%) and no major procedure-related adverse events. The mean ALSFRS-R score at the time of procedure in subjects who died within 90 days was lower than of those alive beyond 90 days (P = .04). This study found that RIG-tube placement is a safe and effective way to manage dysphagia in ALS patients and highlights the importance of educating members of the multidisciplinary clinic in palliative care principles to determine the appropriateness of RIG tube placement.

Home enteral nutrition: A descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: With data demonstrating benefit, the prevalence of home enteral nutrition (HEN) has increased significantly over the last few decades. Despite this increase, there remains a paucity of data regarding real-world use of HEN including clinical outcomes and complications. METHODS: Descriptive analysis of prospectively maintained database of our specialized HEN program was undertaken. Patients who received care in our program with HEN initiation date between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, were included in the analysis. Data regarding demographic information, anthropometrics, enteral nutrition (EN) regimen, electrolytes, and nutrition therapy history were included and tracked until July 31, 2021. RESULTS: During the study period, 1600 patients initiated HEN treatment under our care. Majority of the study population needed EN therapy due to malignancy and its complications, including malignant dysphagia or mechanical obstruction (60.6%) followed by neurodegenerative diseases (7.5%). By the end of the study period, a majority of the patients (82%) stopped HEN treatment. Of these, 44.2% achieved EN goals and/or oral autonomy. Patients continued HEN treatment for a median of 100 (interquartile range, 32-301) days. Overall, 53.2% of patients experienced/reported at least one HEN-related complication that was clinically managed by the HEN team. Complications included tube-related, enteral feeding intolerance (EFI), and electrolyte shifts. CONCLUSION: In our study population, HEN was most utilized to manage malignancy-related complications, including dysphagia. Unfortunately, complications, including EFI and tube-related complications, remained quite prevalent. Further evaluation regarding risk factors for complications and preventive mechanisms, such as increased education, is indicated.

Blenderized Tube Feedings for Adult Patients on Home Enteral Nutrition: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: Despite surveys indicating a high prevalence of blenderized tube feeding (BTF) as an alternative to commercial enteral nutrition (EN), there remains a paucity of data regarding use in clinical practice. The objective of the present open-label pilot study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of BTF in adult patients being given home enteral nutrition (HEN). DESIGN: This is an open-label pilot study, in which all participants who had been on traditional EN formulas were changed to BTF for 6 weeks. SETTING/LOCATION: The Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty individuals gave their consent to participate in the study, with nine completing the 6-week BTF protocol. OUTCOME MEASURES: Weight was measured at baseline and at 6 weeks of BTF use. Participants completed a survey regarding the frequency of BTF use and adverse effects, at baseline and then weekly for 6 weeks. RESULTS: Nine participants with a mean age of 60.6 ± 7.8 years completed the 6-week protocol. BTF use increased from 4.85 ± 2.44 to 6.45 ± 0.82 days per week from week 1 to week 6. The percentage of participants consuming >50% of their calorie intake from BTF increased from 23.1% (3 of 13 participants) at week 1 to 44.4% (4 of 9 participants) at week 6. Six of nine participants experienced weight gain, weight was maintained by one participant, and two participants lost weight (intentionally in one and due to an intolerance of commercial formula in the other). CONCLUSIONS: BTF was found to be safe and effective in promoting weight gain in adult participants who required HEN for at least 6 weeks.

Gravity Flow in Proposed Enteral Tube Small-Bore Connectors.

BACKGROUND: Enteral nutrition (EN) misconnections have been identified as a serious and potential deadly problem. An international effort led by EN industry leaders has developed a small-bore enteral connector (ENFit) that in theory will reduce the frequency of misconnections. Despite the potential benefit of preventing misconnections, the full impact of adoption of the ENFit connector is unknown. To assess the impact of transitioning to ENFit on our home EN (HEN) patients, the current study evaluated gravity feeding comparing 2 proposed small-bore connectors to the legacy (current connector) using various commercial formulas. METHODS: Six commonly used enteral formulas in our facility with varying density and viscosity were tested in triplicate. Forty milliliters of formula was poured into a syringe connected to an ENFit or legacy (current) feeding connector attached to varying French size tubes. The time it took formula to flow through the connectors was recorded, and the test was repeated in triplicate. RESULTS: All formulas took significantly longer to flow through the first ENFit connector compared with the legacy connector ( P < .05). The second ENFit connector demonstrated similar flow dynamics to the legacy connector. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variability in the flow dynamics in ENFit connectors with significant potential impact on many facets of HEN, including medicine delivery, blenderized feeds, venting, and compliance with EN due to increased time to administer feeds. We highly recommend additional testing of flow dynamics, including gravity flow, as ENFit tubes are being developed and adopted.

Blenderized Tube Feeding Use in Adult Home Enteral Nutrition Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Use of long-term enteral nutrition (EN) has increased dramatically in the United States. It has been the authors' experience that most home EN (HEN) patients use blenderized tube feeding (BTF) in addition to commercial EN. There are limited resources available for patients interested in BTF, and studies evaluating safety and effectiveness are limited. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective cross-sectional study (n = 54). INCLUSION CRITERIA: age >18 years, follow-up in HEN clinic, prescribed commercial EN. Participants were provided the survey at HEN follow-up appointments after receiving HEN for at least 3 weeks. RESULTS: Median age (range) was 60.5 (22-87) years with 42.6% females (n = 23). BTF was used by 55.5% of patients (n = 30). Most (57%; n = 31) received HEN for >6 months. BTF use was a median of 4 (1-7) days per week. Most common reasons for using BTF were as follows: it is more natural (43%), like eating what their family does (33%), and tolerate BTF better (30%). In patients who use BTF, 80% reported maintaining goal body weight. BTF resulted in significantly less reported nausea, vomiting, bloating, diarrhea, and constipation compared with commercial EN. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate BTF use in an adult HEN population. More than 50% of our patients used and approximately 80% expressed a desire to use BTF if provided with adequate information. With new connection tube changes coming in the near future, adequate adapters for BTF need to be developed.