Living Kidney Donation Is Recipient Age Sensitive and Has a High Rate of Donor Organ Disqualifications.

BACKGROUND: Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the best therapy for patients with chronic renal failure. Its advantages, compared with cadaveric transplantation, include the possibility of avoiding dialysis, the likelihood of best outcome, and donor pool expansion. Careful assessment of potential donors is important to minimize the risks and ensure success. However, the proportion of donors disqualified has been poorly investigated. The aim of this work is to describe our experience and present the main reasons for missed donation. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study of all potential donors and recipients evaluated for LDKT between January 2008 and December 2017. RESULTS: During the period of study, 81 donor-recipient pairs were evaluated. Of these, 45.7% were disqualified and 37 LDKTs were carried out. LDKT was the first choice in 68% of cases and preemptive in 20%; 60% of transplants were among family members. Sex distribution revealed a prevalence of females in the donor group (69%) and males in the recipient group (70%). The mean living donor age was 53 ± 9.5 years; the mean recipient age was lower in recipients listed in the living transplant program than those listed for cadaver transplantation (45.8 ± 13.4 vs 54.2 ± 11.08; P < .0001). Reasons for denial included hypertension (18.9%), deceased donor transplant performed during the study period (16.2%), urologic pathology (13.5%), incompatibility (13.5%), withdrawal of consent by donor or recipient (13.5%), psychological unsuitability (8.1%), donor cancer (5.4%), and reduced renal clearance (2.7%). CONCLUSION: LDKT is considered an option especially for younger recipients. Of the potential kidney living donors, 45.7% were disqualified during the evaluation, with medical reasons being the primary cause.

Global Performance Status Score: A New Tool to Assess Physical Performance in Kidney Transplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: Information on physical performance in renal transplantation is limited because of the shortage of specifically designed evaluation instruments. Therefore, we elaborated and validated the Global Performance Status (GloPerSta) score to provide a new and comprehensive tool, exploring the different components of physical performance in kidney transplant patients. METHODS: We elaborated the GloPerSta score on the basis of the data obtained from a cross-sectional study, in which we evaluated the physical performance of a cohort of kidney transplant patients. The results of these analyses were weighted to describe the different contribution of any single test, via the generation of a structural equation model, resulting in the definition of the GloPerSta. Then, to internally validate this score, we studied its correlation with clinical parameters and quality of life (evaluated as KDQOL-SF, Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form) in the same patient population. RESULTS: We enrolled 132 patients in whom the functional tests revealed a great heterogeneity. GloPerSta allowed the stratification of the patients in 3 different physical performance categories (low: score 0-11; medium: 12-22; high: 23-33). Internal validation showed that GloPerSta was directly and significantly correlated with the quality of life and allograft function, independent of the time from transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The GloPerSta is a reliable tool to assess physical performance in a kidney transplant population. Its application might be of help in identifying patients needing intensive and personalized rehabilitation programs.

Understanding Bone Damage After Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Monocentric Cross Sectional Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation (KT) immunosuppression may induce bone tissue damage with bone mineral density (BMD) loss increasing bone fractures risk. Steroid therapy is considered the major player, but others factors are still under review. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We designed an observational retrospective cohort study to evaluate bone damage after KT. The prevalence of osteopenia, osteoporosis, bone fractures, and the associated risk factors were investigated. The following parameters were recorded before transplantation and at the last follow-up: demographic indexes, cumulative steroid dose (CSD), dialytic and transplantologic age, previous nephropathy, femoral and lumbar BMD, fractures, immunosuppressors, calcemia, phosphoremia, rejection episodes, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and parathyroid hormone and vitamin D levels. Stata software (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, United States) was used for the statistical analysis, to perform the Fisher's exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Student t test, as well as univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The analyzed cohort was composed of 297 patients (65.3% males and 34.7% females). Sixty percent of KT patients had normal BMD, 24% had osteopenia, and 15% had osteoporosis. Twelve percent were victims of bone fractures (8.4% minor, 2% femoral, and 1.7% vertebral). A significant correlation (P <.05) was observed for both osteopenia and osteoporosis with menopause, transplantologic age, CSD, previous glomerulonephritis, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors treatment (imTOR). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the correlation between CSD (both before and after transplantation) and post-transplantation bone damage. It also shows that a large fraction of these patients had normal BMD related with a low steroid dose in our protocols. This correlation between imTOR assumption and osteoporosis deserves attention and warrants further in vitro analyses to be performed.