Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Cardiovasc Med ; 17(1-2): 76-79, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27667385

RESUMO

The percutaneous transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention is increasing in the United States. Although its vascular safety profile is better than the traditional femoral approach, it is important to learn about potential complications. In this article, we present two cases of vascular complications, namely, pseudoaneurysm and radial artery occlusion, after transradial cardiac catheterization, along with a review of the relevant literature.


Assuntos
Falso Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagem , Falso Aneurisma/etiologia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Artéria Radial/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Radial/lesões , Idoso , Falso Aneurisma/terapia , Angiografia Coronária , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ultrassonografia Doppler
2.
F1000Res ; 3: 120, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25110581

RESUMO

Medical societies, faculty, and trainees use Twitter to learn from and educate other social media users. These social media communities bring together individuals with various levels of experience. It is not known if experienced individuals are also the most influential members. We hypothesize that participants with the greatest experience would be the most influential members of a Twitter community. We analyzed the 2013 Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine Twitter community. We measured the number of tweets authored by each participant and the number of amplified tweets (re-tweets). We developed a multivariate linear regression model to identify any relationship to social media influence, measured by the PageRank. Faculty (from academic institutions) comprised 19% of the 132 participants in the learning community (p < 0.0001). Faculty authored 49% of all 867 tweets (p < 0.0001). Their tweets were the most likely to be amplified (52%, p < 0.01). Faculty had the greatest influence amongst all participants (mean 1.99, p < 0.0001). Being a faculty member had no predictive effect on influence (ß = 0.068, p = 0.6). The only factors that predicted influence (higher PageRank) were the number of tweets authored (p < 0.0001) and number of tweets amplified (p < 0.0001) The status of "faculty member" did not confer a greater influence. Any participant who was able to author the greatest number of tweets or have more of his/her tweets amplified could wield a greater influence on the participants, regardless of his/her authority.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...