RESUMO
We describe the institutional guidelines of a major tertiary cancer center with regard to using hypofractionated radiation regimens to treat glioblastoma as a measure to minimize exposure to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) while not sacrificing clinical outcomes. Our guidelines review level one evidence of various hypofractionated regimens, and recommend a multidisciplinary approach while balancing the risk of morbidity and mortality among individuals at high risk for severe illness from COVID-19 infection. We also briefly outline strategies our department is taking in mitigating risk among our cancer patients undergoing radiation.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to report on the safety, feasibility, and workflow of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) simulation, while immobilized in the treatment position, for radiation therapy treatment planning in the pediatric population. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between May and December 2017, 10 pediatric patients completed both MRI and computed tomography imaging simulation in treatment immobilization for radiation therapy planning for central nervous system disease. We report our initial institutional experience and workflow of the use of MRI simulation in immobilization for treatment planning in this population. RESULTS: Ten pediatric patients successfully underwent MRI and computed tomography imaging simulation for CNS disease. Two patients required anesthesia for sedation during the simulations. From our initial experience, MRI simulation was tolerated by all 10 pediatric patients without any safety or clinical issues, including those who required anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience supports the use of MRI simulation for radiation treatment planning in the pediatric population, with and without anesthetic sedation, as a safe and feasible image-guidance tool. This is particularly useful in the treatment of pediatric patients because MRI simulation enables superior, soft-tissue, anatomic imaging for a more robust delineation of organs at risk and target volumes without increasing radiation exposure.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Spinal ependymomas are rare, with an incidence of 1 per 100,000. Given the paucity of data for higher grade II and III disease, the management and patterns of care require further investigation. METHODS: Our study of 1345 patients with higher-grade spinal ependymoma used χ2 tests and simple and multivariable logistic regression models to assess demographic and clinical factors associated with therapy. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to assess overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Most grade II patients received surgery alone (81.1%) compared with 36.8% of grade III. Approximately 60% of patients with grade III ependymomas received radiotherapy (RT) versus 15.3% of grade II (P < 0.001). Patients living ≤32 km (20 miles) from a facility were more likely to receive RT (P < 0.001) than were those living further away. On multivariable logistic regression, grade (grade III, odds ratio, 8.6; P < 0.001) and facility distance were significantly associated with receipt of RT (P < 0.0001). The 5-year and 10-year OS was 94.7%/85.1% for patients with grade II disease and 58.2%/46.4% for grade III disease (P < 0.0001). OS was highest at facilities treating an average of 15 patients over 10 years, corresponding to the top 81st percentile in volume. The 10-year OS was 92.6% at facilities treating at least 15 patients and 88.0% at facilities treating 6-14 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 40% of patients with grade III ependymomas do not receive immediate adjuvant therapy, which may be related to distance from a facility. Patients with this rare tumor may benefit from multidisciplinary care at facilities with a larger volume.
