RESUMO
BackgroundEnisamium (trade name Amizon(R) MAX) is an orally available therapeutic that inhibits influenza A virus and SARS-CoV-2 replication and improves influenza patient recovery. We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of enisamium treatment combined with standard care compared to standard care plus treatment with a placebo control in adult, hospitalized patients with moderate COVID-19 requiring external oxygen. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT04682873. MethodsThe study was a phase three, multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 14 clinical centers. Hospitalized patients aged [≥]18 years with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either enisamium (500 mg per dose, 4 times a day) or a placebo. The treatment lasted [≤]7 days in case of early discharge from the hospital, or loss of the patients ability to swallow due to the need for ventilation. All patients received standard of care as deemed necessary by the investigator and the health status of each patient. All patients received standard of care as deemed necessary by the investigator and each patients health status. The primary outcome was an improvement of at least two points on an 8-point, modified WHO severity rating (SR) scale within 29 days of randomization. The primary and safety outcomes were analyzed in accordance to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. FindingsA total of 592 patients were enrolled and randomized between May 2020 and March 2021. Only patients with a baseline SR of 4 (285 subjects or 48.1%) were included in the ITT analysis. Patients with a baseline SR of 5 were excluded as the interim analysis did not show relevant differences between the enisamium group and placebo in this sub-group. The patients with a baseline SR of 4 were divided into two groups: 142 (49.8%) were assigned to the enisamium group and 143 (50.2%) to the placebo group. No differences were observed between the safety or patient tolerability profiles of the enisamium and placebo treatment. Analysis of the ITT population showed that if patients were treated within 4 days of the onset of COVID-19 symptoms, the median time to improvement was 8 for the enisamium group and 13 days for the placebo group (p = 0.0051). For patients treated within 7 days of the onset of COVID-19 symptoms, the median time to improvement was 10 days for the enisamium group and 11 days for the placebo group (p = 0.0035). Comparison of groups using a stratified one-sided Logrank criterion (adjustment using stratification by age categories: "<40 years", "40-<65 years" and "[≥]65 years") showed statistically significant differences between the groups (p = 0.00945, one-sided). InterpretationEnisamium is safe to use in COVID-19 patients. In COVID-19 patients that did not require supplementary oxygen (SR = 5), standard treatment was sufficient to aid recovery and enisamium did not offer significant clinical benefits. However, we found that standard care combined with enisamium offers a significant clinical benefit when given to patients with moderate COVID-19 requiring supplementary oxygen (SR = 4), if enisamium is given within 7 days of the onset of symptoms. These data suggest that enisamium therapy can be used as therapy against SARS-CoV-2 infection in these patients. FundingFarmak JSC, Wellcome Trust, and Royal Society.
