Bone marrow iron scoring in healthy and clinically ill dogs with and without evidence of iron-restricted erythropoiesis.

BACKGROUND: There are few reports in dogs that have evaluated the utility of semi-quantitative scoring of bone marrow iron stores in conjunction with reticulocyte hemoglobin (CHr) to identify iron-restricted erythropoiesis due to absolute iron deficiency or iron sequestration. OBJECTIVES: An established system for scoring iron stores in human bone marrow samples was applied to dogs. The objectives were to evaluate interobserver agreement (Κω ), determine marrow iron scores in dogs without detectable hematologic abnormalities, and assess combined interpretation of iron scores and CHr to evaluate for iron-restricted erythropoiesis. METHODS: Four blinded observers independently scored iron in 139 Prussian blue-stained canine marrow samples from 0 (none) to 6 (very heavy), including healthy controls (n = 12), clinically ill dogs with (n = 100) and without (n = 16) detectable hematologic abnormalities, and dogs with experimental nutritional iron deficiency (n = 11). Additional medical record data were available for 118 dogs to evaluate for other evidence of iron deficiency (abnormal CHr, RBC indices, serum iron variables, external blood loss, or nutritional deficiencies). RESULTS: Mean Κω was 0.69 (substantial agreement) for all samples but was 0.44 (moderate agreement) for samples with iron scores <3, indicating distinguishing scores 0-2 may not be reliable. Dogs without detectable hematologic abnormalities had scores from 3-5. Dogs with scores <3 and decreased CHr often had more indicators of iron deficiency vs dogs only having low iron scores or low CHr. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of dogs with marrow iron score <3 for external blood loss or nutritional deficiencies is likely clinically worthwhile, particularly if there is also decreased CHr.

Comparison of iron staining and scoring methods on canine bone marrow aspirates.

BACKGROUND: Insufficient iron for erythropoiesis can occur in multiple conditions, including absolute iron deficiency, which is often caused by chronic external hemorrhage in dogs. Distinguishing this from other causes of iron-restricted erythropoiesis allows appropriate intervention. Decreased marrow iron assessed by Prussian blue staining is a method to diagnose absolute iron deficiency, but scoring systems for marrow iron are not validated in dogs. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to (a) evaluate the technical performance of two bone marrow iron scoring systems used in human medicine and (b) examine the effects of destaining and restaining on iron stores after Wright-stained marrow slides are destained and restained with a Prussian blue stain. METHODS: Two marrow aspirate slides were included from each of 12 ill dogs in which marrow was collected during clinical evaluation. One slide was directly stained with Prussian blue. The other was first stained with Wright stain, then destained and restained with Prussian blue. Three blinded observers scored the presence of iron in each of the 24 randomized slides using the Gale (scale 0-6) and sideroblast methods (percentage score). Slides were then re-randomized and rescored. RESULTS: For the Gale method, interobserver agreement was fair, and intraobserver agreement was substantial to perfect. There was less agreement using the sideroblast method, with a significant observer effect. Iron scores were significantly lower in destained slides compared with those stained directly. CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were acceptable for the Gale method, but the sideroblast method should be used cautiously. A destaining procedure before Prussian blue staining could decrease marrow iron scores.