The efficacy of tacrolimus and sirolimus in heavily pre-treated unresectable thymic malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Thymomas and thymic carcinomas, although uncommon, constitute a significant proportion of anterior mediastinal tumours. Systemic chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for inoperable or recurrent disease, but immunosuppressive therapy may provide an alternative treatment strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present a series of 18 patients diagnosed with unresectable thymic tumours, of which eight received immunosuppressive therapy following relapse after chemotherapy. RESULTS: Eight individuals were treated with primary immunotherapy after a median of 3.5 lines of chemotherapy (range 2-6 lines), of which 3 had confirmed myasthenia gravis (MG). After 3 months, 2 patients achieved a radiological partial response and 4 had stable disease. The median time to progression measured 6.8 months (CI 1.4-19.3 months). Two of the 4 patients who progressed on tacrolimus and prednisolone received sirolimus. One of these patients has stable disease (SD) at 21 months, and the other has SD at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Although previous case reports have related tacrolimus therapy with tumour shrinkage in patients with MG-associated invasive thymomas, these data are the first to demonstrate the efficacy of such immunosuppressive agents in a larger cohort of heavily pre-treated patients with thymic tumours. Our experience adds to the limited anecdotal evidence in the literature, and suggests that immunosuppressive agents represent a valuable additional treatment for thymic tumours.

Predictive markers in breast cancer--the present.

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and there is a continual drive to identify markers that will aid in predicting prognosis and response to therapy. To date, relatively few markers have established prognostic power. Oestrogen receptor (ER) is probably the most powerful predictive marker in breast cancer management, both in determining prognosis and in predicting response to hormone therapies. Progesterone receptor (PR) is also a widely used marker, although its value is less well established. HER-2 status has also become a routine prognostic and predictive factor in breast cancer. Given the importance of these biological markers in patient management, it is essential that assays are robust and quality controlled, and that interpretation is standardized. Furthermore, it is important to be aware of the limitations in their predictive power, and how this may be refined through addition of further biological markers. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the established role of ER, PR and HER-2 in patient management, the current standards for assessing these markers, as well as highlighting the controversies that still surround their use and methods of assessment.