Meeting the guidelines: Implementing a distress screening intervention for veterans with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend systematic evaluation of distress screening and referral for cancer patients. Implementation remains a notable gap for cancer centers serving disadvantaged communities. We present the implementation of a distress screening program within a Veterans Affairs hospital oncology clinic, serving a majority African American (AA) male population of low socioeconomic status (SES). METHODS: The Coleman Foundation funded this program supporting a palliative care physician and psychologist to implement screening in a phased approach as follows: (1) Organizing key stakeholders, (2) educating clinical staff, (3) delivering distress screening, (4) generating documentation, and (5) implementing clinical action and referral pathways. We utilized validated measures in the "Patient Screening Questions for Supportive Care" screening tool. RESULTS: This program was unsuccessful in screening all veterans with cancer; however, we were able to implement 3 years of longitudinal screening. In distress screens from the initial program period (n = 253), patients were primarily males (95.6%) of older age (m = 70, standard deviation = 9.45), AA (76.4%), with various cancers of advanced disease (69%). Males reported moderate psychosocial distress and elevated financial needs. For males with elevated psychosocial distress (n = 63, PHQ-4 ≥3), 36% were previously connected with psychosocial services. Following screening, engagement increased as the majority (77%) established psychosocial care. CONCLUSIONS: This screening program had mixed success. Centralized program staff and available supportive care referrals were critical for program implementation. Screening may have increased engagement in social work/mental health services for males of low SES. Screening programs should be tailored to the needs of underserved communities with accessible housing/food subsidies.

A Heart Failure Management Program Using Shared Medical Appointments.

BACKGROUND: Disease management programs for heart failure (HF) effectively reduce HF-related hospitalization rates and mortality. Shared medical appointments (SMAs) offer a cost-effective delivery method for HF disease management programs. However, few studies have evaluated this cost-effective delivery method of HF disease management among Veterans with acute HF. We hypothesized that Veterans who attended a multidisciplinary HF-SMA clinic promoting HF self-management, compared those who only received individual treatment through the HF specialty clinic, would have better 12-month hospitalization outcomes. METHODS: We completed a retrospective review of the VA electronic health record for HF-SMA clinic appointments (1/1/2012 to 12/31/2013). The multidisciplinary HF-SMA program comprised 4 weekly sessions covering topics including HF disease, HF medications, diet adherence, physical activity, psychological well-being, and stress management. Patients who attended the HF-SMA clinic (n=54) were compared to patients who were scheduled for an HF-SMA appointment but never attended and were followed only in the HF clinic (n=37). Outcomes were 12-month HF-related and all-cause hospitalization rates, days in the hospital, and time to first hospitalization. RESULTS: Of 141 patients scheduled for an HF-SMA clinic appointment, 54 met criteria for the HF-SMA clinic group and 37 were included in the HF clinic group. The groups did not significantly differ on any sociodemographic variables. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the HF-SMA group and the HF clinic group on demographics or hospitalization outcomes, p>.05 for all comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Our results did not support our hypothesis that offering multidisciplinary, HF-SMAs promoting HF self-management skills, above and beyond the individual disease management care provided in an HF specialty clinic, would improve hospitalization outcomes among Veterans with acute HF. Limitations of the present study and recommendations for HF self-management programs for Veterans are discussed.