Tratamiento de la macromastia sintomática en una unidad de mama. Resultados de la reducción mamaria evaluados mediante el cuestionario BREAST-Q / Treatment of symptomatic macromastia in a breast unit. Outcomes analysis of breast reduction using BREAST-Q

Introducción: El BREAST-Q (módulo reducción mamaria) es un cuestionario específico y validado para evaluar la reducción mamaria en el tratamiento de la macromastia sintomática, ofreciendo información sobre la calidad de vida y grado de satisfacción de las pacientes. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo de una cohorte de 34 pacientes tratadas mediante reducción mamaria bilateral, en una unidad de mama en 2017-2020, que fueron encuestadas con la versión adaptada al castellano del BREAST-Q. Las pacientes cumplimentaron el cuestionario en el mes previo a la cirugía y después de esta. Los cambios de las puntuaciones pre- y postoperatorias en los diferentes dominios se analizaron mediante la prueba de rangos con signo de Wilcoxon. La significación estadística fue determinada con valores de p<0,05. Resultados: El tiempo medio desde la cirugía a la encuesta postoperatoria fue 16 (DE 9) meses. Complicaciones o secuelas posquirúrgicas sucedieron en 14 (42%) pacientes con 23 eventos. Las puntuaciones preoperatorias, medianas y rango intercuartílico, en la satisfacción con las mamas (28, 26), bienestar psicológico (33, 14), físico (42, 19) y sexual (34, 14) mejoraron en la encuesta postoperatoria a (82, 15), (81,29), (82, 30) y (90, 38), respectivamente, con significación estadística, p<0,001. Conclusiones: La primera aplicación del BREAST-Q versión en castellano para españolas a pacientes con macromastia tratadas quirúrgicamente en una unidad de mama demuestra que la reducción mamaria mejora la calidad de vida de las pacientes y, que estas están muy satisfechas con el resultado de la cirugía y su cirujano, aunque la información recibida es mejorable. (AU)

Introduction: The BREAST-Q (breast reduction module) is a specific and validated questionnaire to evaluate breast reduction in the treatment of symptomatic macromastia, offering information on their quality of life and degree of satisfaction. Methods: Prospective study of a cohort of 34 patients treated by bilateral breast reduction in a breast unit in 2017–2020 surveyed with the Spanish version of BREAST-Q version 2. The statistical study to assess the effect of reduction, changes from the pre to postoperative scores of the domains were performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Statistical significance was determined with P values <.05. Results: The mean time elapsed from surgery to the postoperative survey was 16 (SD 9) months. Post-surgical complications or sequelae occurred in 14 (42%) patients with 23 events. The preoperative scores, median and interquartile range, in satisfaction with the breasts (28, 26), psychological (33, 14), physical (42, 19) and sexual (34, 14) well-being improved in the postoperative survey to (82, 15), (81, 29), (82, 30) and (90, 38), respectively. These changes were statistically significant, P<.001. Conclusions: The first application of the BREAST-Q in its version in Spanish for Spanish women in patients with symptomatic macromastia treated surgically in a breast unit shows that breast reduction improves the quality of life of patients and that they are very satisfied with the outcome of the surgery and its surgeon, although the information received should clearly be improved. (AU)

Treatment of symptomatic macromastia in a breast unit. Outcomes analysis of breast reduction using BREAST-Q.

INTRODUCTION: The BREAST-Q (breast reduction module) is a specific and validated questionnaire to evaluate breast reduction in the treatment of symptomatic macromastia, offering information on their quality of life and degree of satisfaction. METHODS: Prospective study of a cohort of 34 patients treated by bilateral breast reduction in a breast unit in 2017-2020 surveyed with the Spanish version of BREAST-Q version 2. The statistical study to assess the effect of reduction, changes from the pre to postoperative scores of the domains were performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Statistical significance was determined with p values ​​<0.05. RESULTS: The mean time elapsed from surgery to the postoperative survey was 16 (SD 9) months. Post-surgical complications or sequelae occurred in 14 (42%) patients with 23 events. The preoperative scores, median and interquartile range, in satisfaction with the breasts (28, 26), psychological (33, 14), physical (42, 19) and sexual (34, 14) well-being improved in the postoperative survey to (82, 15), (81.29), (82, 30) and (90, 38), respectively. These changes were statistically significant, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The first application of the BREAST-Q in its version in Spanish for Spanish women in patients with symptomatic macromastia treated surgically in a breast unit shows that breast reduction improves the quality of life of patients and that they are very satisfied with the outcome of the surgery and its surgeon, although the information received should clearly be improved.

Evaluación geriátrica guiada por G8 en la decisión del tratamiento de adultos mayores con cáncer: un estudio piloto / Geriatric evaluation guided by G8 in the decision to treat older adults with cancer: a pilot study / Avaliação geriátrica guiada pelo G8 na decisão de tratar idosos com câncer: um estudo piloto

Introducción: El cáncer es una enfermedad asociada al envejecimiento y tiene una alta prevalencia en los adultos mayores. La valoración geriátrica integral (VGI) mejora los cuidados de los adultos mayores (AM) con cáncer. En contextos sanitarios con recursos limitados, no todos los AM podrán ser evaluados por un geriatra. Un modelo en 2 pasos, incluyendo el test G8, en la consulta habitual del oncólogo, permite seleccionar aquellos pacientes que se beneficiarán de una VGI. Esta puede aportar en la toma de decisiones del tratamiento oncológico específico. Objetivo: Evaluar el beneficio del test G8 y la VGI en ≥ 70 años con cáncer candidatos a recibir quimioterapia. Material y Métodos: Estudio observacional, descriptivo, de corte transversal, de una muestra no probabilística de pacientes ≥ de 70 años con diagnóstico de cáncer y candidatos a recibir quimioterapia. Se aplicó el G8 por el oncólogo y se completó la VGI en los que presentaron alteración en algunas de las áreas evaluadas. Resultados: Se analizaron 32 pacientes. Se realizó G8 a todos, en 21 de ellos se completó la VGI. En estos, en reunión multidisciplinaria con oncólogo y geriatra se discutió el tratamiento. En el 38% de los pacientes se cambió la conducta oncológica tras contar con la valoración geriátrica integral. Conclusión: Creemos que la incorporación del G8 en la práctica clínica del oncólogo aporta una herramienta de cribado útil para identificar los pacientes ≥70 años que se benefician de una VGI previa al inicio de tratamiento oncoespecífico, optimizando de esta manera los recursos.

Introduction: Cancer is a disease associated with aging and has a high prevalence in older adults. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) improves the care of older adults (OA)with cancer. In healthcare settings with limited resources, not all OA may be evaluated by a geriatrician. A 2-step model, including the G8 test, in the usual oncologist consultation, allows selecting those patients who will benefit from CGA. This can contribute to decision-making regarding specific cancer treatment. Objective: To evaluate the benefit of the incorporation of the G8 test and CGA in the ≥ 70 years with cancer candidates for chemotherapy. Material and Methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study of a non-probability sample of patients ≥ 70 years of age with a diagnosis of cancer and candidates for chemotherapy. The G8 was applied by the oncologist and the CGA was completed in those who presented alteration in some of the evaluated areas. Results: 32 patients were analyzed. G8 was performed in all, in 21 of them the CGA was completed. In these, the treatment was discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting with an oncologist and a geriatrician. Oncological behavior was changed in 38% of patients after having a comprehensive geriatric evaluation. Conclusion: We believe that the incorporation of the G8 test in the clinical practice of the oncologist provides a useful screening tool to identify patients ≥70 years who benefit from CGA prior to the start of oncospecific treatment, thus optimizing resources.

Introdução: O câncer é uma doença associada ao envelhecimento e tem alta prevalência em idosos. A avaliação geriátrica ampla (AGA) melhora o atendimento a idosos com câncer. Em ambientes de saúde com recursos limitados, nem todos eles podem ser avaliadas por um geriatra. Um modelo de duas etapas, incluindo o teste G8, na consulta oncológica usual, permite selecionar os pacientes que serão beneficiados pela AGA. Isso pode contribuir para a tomada de decisões em relação ao tratamento específico do câncer. Objetivo: Avaliar o benefício da incorporação do teste G8 e AGA nos ≥ 70 anos com câncer, candidatos à quimioterapia. Material e Métodos: Estudo observacional, descritivo e transversal de uma amostra não probabilística de pacientes com idade ≥ 70 anos com diagnóstico de câncer e candidatos à quimioterapia. O G8 foi aplicado pelo oncologista e a AGA foi realizada naqueles que apresentaram alteração em algumas das áreas avaliadas. Resultados: 32 pacientes foram analisados. O G8 foi realizado em todos, em 21 deles a AGA foi aplicada. Nesses, o tratamento foi discutido em reunião multidisciplinar com oncologista e geriatra. O tratamento oncológico foi alterado em 38% dos pacientes após uma avaliação geriátrica amplia. Conclusão: Acreditamos que a incorporação do teste G8 na prática clínica do oncologista fornece uma ferramenta de triagem útil para identificar pacientes com idade ≥70 anos que se beneficiam da AGA antes do início do tratamento oncoespecífico, otimizando recursos.

Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery with tailored needle-guided excision.

BACKGROUND: Breast conserving surgery (BCS) administered with oncoplastic approach (OBCS), when it is required, is currently the gold standard for the treatment of early breast cancer. Wire-guided localization (WL) is the most popular technique used to help surgeon in breast cancer excision. Currently, a universal and undeniable goal is to minimize the rate of positive margins and re-excision operation after BCS improving cosmetic outcome and decreasing health care costs. This study is aimed to report our experience combining OBCS and tailored WL as surgical approach for early breast cancers. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on 148 breast cancer patients who were treated with OBCS and tailored WL, which consists in individualization of the number and location of wires depending on patient particularities, in our Breast Unit from March 2013 to December 2015. A multivariate analysis was used to determine the association between clinic-pathologic variables, which can be known preoperatively, and margin status. RESULTS: The rate of affected margins was 13.5% and 10.8% patients underwent re-interventions for oncologic reasons. Multifocality was strongly associated with involved margins [odds ratio (OR) 4.67]. CONCLUSIONS: OBCS together with tailored WL obtains an acceptable rate of positive margins and high rate of final BCS.

Cupriavidus plantarum sp. nov., a plant-associated species.

During a survey of plant-associated bacteria in northeast Mexico, a group of 13 bacteria was isolated from agave, maize and sorghum plants rhizosphere. This group of strains was related to Cupriavidus respiraculi (99.4 %), but a polyphasic investigation based on DNA-DNA hybridization analysis, other genotypic studies and phenotypic features showed that this group of strains actually belongs to a new Cupriavidus species. Consequently, taking all the results together, the description of Cupriavidus plantarum sp. nov. is proposed.