Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Aten. prim. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 44(8): 485-493, ago. 2012. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-106547

RESUMO

Objetivo: El Brief Physical Activity Assessment Tool (BPAAT) y General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ) son instrumentos breves y válidos para identificar pacientes «físicamente inactivos» en consulta. Este estudio evalúa la fiabilidad y validez de su versión catalana (CBPAAT-CGPPAQ) y española (CBPAAT-EGPPAQ) ante la inexistencia de instrumentos similares validados en nuestro medio. Diseño: Evaluación psicométrica de la adaptación cultural y lingüística al catalán/español de 2 instrumentos de medida. Emplazamiento: centros de atención primaria. Participantes: La carga de administración de los cuestionarios se evaluó en 7 profesionales sanitarios y 44 pacientes. Su validez de constructo y fiabilidad test-retest se evaluó en 105 pacientes (58 años±20; 37% hombres) sin contraindicaciones para hacer actividad física (AF). Mediciones principales: Después de efectuar la traducción directa e inversa, la validez de constructo midió el grado de acuerdo de dichas versiones con el Cuestionario Internacional de AF (IPAQ) versión corta. La fiabilidad test-retest se evaluó repitiendo el cuestionario en un intervalo de 14-28 días. Resultados: El CBPAAT-EBPAAT mostró un grado de acuerdo moderado con el IPAQ coincidiendo en un 80 y 83% de los casos «inactivos». Presentaron una buena fiabilidad test-retest, coincidiendo en un 86 y un 88% de la clasificación. El CGPPAQ-EGPPAQ mostró un grado de acuerdo moderado con el IPAQ, coincidiendo en un 70 y 60% de los casos «inactivos». Presentaron una buena fiabilidad test-retest, coincidiendo en la clasificación de un 82 y 72% de los casos. Conclusiones: El CBPAAT-CGPPAQ y EBPAAT-EGPPAQ presentan una validez aceptable para identificar en consulta a pacientes físicamente inactivos(AU)


Objective: The Brief Physical Activity Assessment Tool (BPAAT) and the General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ) are valid and reliable assessment tools to identify "inactive" patients in primary care. No similar tools exist for the Spanish population. The study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Catalan and Spanish versions (CBPAAT-CGPPAQ; CBPAAT-EGPPAQ) of such tools. Design: Validation study of the linguistic and cultural adaptation of two questionnaires into Catalan/Spanish. Setting: Centres of Primary Care. Participants: The load for administering the questionnaires was evaluated by 7 general practitioners and 44 patients. Construct validity and reliability was assessed in 105 patients (58 years old±20; 37% men) without any contraindication for physical activity (PA). Main variables: After carrying out the translation and back-translation, construct validity was assessed against the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ short form). Reliability was assessed administering the questionnaires again within 14 to 28 days. Results: The validity of the CBPAAT-EBPAAT showed a moderate percentage agreement, correctly classifying over 80% and 83% of the "inactive" cases. Reliability was also good, correctly classifying over 86% and 88% of the cases. The validity of the CGPPAQ-EGPPAQ showed a moderate percentage agreement, correctly classifying over 70% and 60% of the "inactive" cases. Reliability was good, correctly classifying over 82% and 72% of the cases. Conclusions: The CBPAAT-CGPPAQ and EBPAAT-EGPPAQ are valid instruments to identify "inactive" patients that should receive advice on PA(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Atividade Motora , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Psicometria/métodos , Psicometria/tendências , Atividade Motora/fisiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários , Desempenho Psicomotor/fisiologia
2.
Aten Primaria ; 44(8): 485-93, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22463945

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The Brief Physical Activity Assessment Tool (BPAAT) and the General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ) are valid and reliable assessment tools to identify "inactive" patients in primary care. No similar tools exist for the Spanish population. The study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Catalan and Spanish versions (CBPAAT-CGPPAQ; CBPAAT-EGPPAQ) of such tools. DESIGN: Validation study of the linguistic and cultural adaptation of two questionnaires into Catalan/Spanish. SETTING: Centres of Primary Care. PARTICIPANTS: The load for administering the questionnaires was evaluated by 7 general practitioners and 44 patients. Construct validity and reliability was assessed in 105 patients (58 years old±20; 37% men) without any contraindication for physical activity (PA). MAIN VARIABLES: After carrying out the translation and back-translation, construct validity was assessed against the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ short form). Reliability was assessed administering the questionnaires again within 14 to 28 days. RESULTS: The validity of the CBPAAT-EBPAAT showed a moderate percentage agreement, correctly classifying over 80% and 83% of the "inactive" cases. Reliability was also good, correctly classifying over 86% and 88% of the cases. The validity of the CGPPAQ-EGPPAQ showed a moderate percentage agreement, correctly classifying over 70% and 60% of the "inactive" cases. Reliability was good, correctly classifying over 82% and 72% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: The CBPAAT-CGPPAQ and EBPAAT-EGPPAQ are valid instruments to identify "inactive" patients that should receive advice on PA.


Assuntos
Atividade Motora , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Comportamento Sedentário , Inquéritos e Questionários , Características Culturais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traduções
3.
Rev Enferm ; 29(4): 24-9, 2006 Apr.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16724497

RESUMO

Although being sedentary is recognized as the most prevalent cardiovascular risk factor in industrialized societies, health measures tend to concentrate on secondary and tertiary prevention methods, using pharmacological curative measures instead of favoring methods of primary prevention by means of promoting healthy lifestyles. This article hits on the essentials to promote physical exercise by our patients.


Assuntos
Exercício Físico , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde
4.
Rev. Rol enferm ; 29(4): 264-270, abr. 2006. ilus, tab
Artigo em Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-047089

RESUMO

Aunque el sedentarismo se reconoce como el factor de riesgo cardiovascular más prevalente en las sociedades industrializadas, los recursos sanitarios suelen centrarse en aspectos de prevención secundaria y terciaria, con abordajes farmacológicos, en lugar de favorecer las intervenciones en prevención primaria mediante la promoción de estilos de vida saludables. El artículo aborda lo esencial para promover la práctica de ejercicio entre nuestros pacientes


Although being sedentary is recognized as the most prevalent cardiovascular risk factor in industrialized societies, health measures tend to concentrate on secondary and tertiary prevention methods, using pharmacological curative measures instead of favoring methods of primary prevention by means of promoting healthy lifestyles. This article hits on the essentials to promote physical exercise by our patients


Assuntos
Humanos , Exercício Físico , Promoção da Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...