Switching to tenofovir/emtricitabine from abacavir/lamivudine in HIV-infected adults with raised cholesterol: effect on lipid profiles.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect on fasting lipid parameters of switching to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus emtricitabine (FTC) from abacavir (ABC) plus lamivudine (3TC; both fixed-dose combinations), while maintaining ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r). METHODS: This was an open-label randomized two-arm 12-week controlled study in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients with elevated cholesterol (≥5.2 mmol/l). Patients stable on ABC/3TC plus LPV/r either continued treatment or switched to TDF/FTC plus LPV/r for 12 weeks. Standard efficacy and safety end points (including fasting lipids) were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 85 subjects were treated (n=42 ABC/FTC and n=43 TDF/3TC). A statistically significant decrease in total cholesterol was observed in the TDF/FTC group: from median (IQR) 6.22 mmol/l (5.91-6.77) at baseline to 5.75 mmol/l (5.04-6.18) at week 12 (median [IQR] change from baseline -0.73 mmol/l [-1.20- -0.18]; P<0.001). No notable change was observed for the ABC/3TC group. The difference between groups at week 12 was -0.82 mmol/l (P<0.001). For TDF/FTC (but not for ABC/3TC), statistically significant reductions (P<0.05) from baseline were observed in total, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)- and non-HDL cholesterol (at weeks 4 and 12). Statistically significant decreases were observed in median estimated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault) from baseline to week 12 for patients who switched to TDF/FTC (-5.47 ml/min) versus the ABC/3TC group (-2.15 ml/min; P=0.016 between groups). Virological suppression was maintained in both groups. No new safety issues were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to TDF/FTC from ABC/3TC was associated with rapid improvements in fasting lipid parameters and continued virological control in patients receiving LPV/r as the third component of antiretroviral therapy. The effect of these changes on clinical end points remains unclear and would need to be evaluated in a longer-term study.

Triple nucleoside treatment with abacavir plus the lamivudine/zidovudine combination tablet (COM) compared to indinavir/COM in antiretroviral therapy-naïve adults: results of a 48-week open-label, equivalence trial (CNA3014).

OBJECTIVE: An equivalence (non-inferiority) trial comparing antiviral response, tolerability, and adherence with a triple nucleoside regimen containing abacavir 300 mg (ABC) plus a lamivudine 150-mg/zidovudine 300-mg combination tablet (COM) twice daily vs. a regimen containing the protease inhibitor indinavir (IDV) 800 mg three times daily plus COM twice daily (IDV/COM) in antiretroviral-naïve, HIV-infected patients. METHODS: Adult patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels > or = 5000 copies/mL and CD4+ cell counts > or = 100 cells/mm(3) were randomized to receive open-label ABC/COM (n = 169) or IDV/COM (n = 173) for 48 weeks. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was the primary population evaluated. ITT: switch/missing equals failure (ITT: S/M = F) and as-treated (AT) analyses were used for assessing the proportion of patients achieving plasma HIV-1 RNA level < 400 and < 50 copies/mL at each clinic visit. In the ITT: S/M = F analysis, patients who switched treatment or had missing values were considered treatment failures; the AT analysis examined virologic data only while patients received study treatment. ABC/COM was considered equivalent (non-inferior) to IDV/COM if the lower limit of the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) about the difference in proportions of ABC/COM- vs. IDV/COM-treated patients attaining plasma HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL exceeded -15% at week 48. RESULTS: The study population was diverse with respect to ethnicity (38% Asian, 27% Hispanic, 28% white, 3% black, 4% other) and gender (39% women, 61% men). Baseline median HIV-1 RNA was 4.80 log(10) copies/mL and CD4+ cell count was 315 cells/mm(3). ABC/COM met the criterion of equivalence to IDV/COM. In the ITT: S/M = F analysis at Week 48, a greater proportion of ABC/COM-treated patients achieved HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL (66% [109/164] vs. 50% [82/165]; treatment difference 16.6%, 95% CI (6.0, 27.2), p = 0.002) and HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL (60% [99/164] vs. 50% [83/165]; treatment difference 9.6%, 95% CI [-1.1, 20.2]), whereas the AT analysis showed similar proportions achieving these endpoints (< 400 copies/mL: 85 vs. 83%; < 50 copies/mL: 79 vs 81%). Comparable proportions of patients with screening HIV-1 RNA values > 100 000 copies/mL achieved HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL (ABC/COM: 60% [35/58]; IDV/COM: 51% [33/65]; treatment difference 9.6%, 95% CI [-7.9, 27.1]; ITT: S/M = F analysis). A significantly greater proportion taking ABC/COM were > or = 95% adherent (72% [109/151] vs. 45% [70/154] with IDV/COM, p < 0.001). Median increases from baseline in CD4+ cell counts were similar in the two treatment groups (+148 vs. +152 cells/mm(3)). Significantly more patients on IDV/COM reported drug-related adverse events (87% [142/165] vs. 65% [108/164] with ABC/COM, p < 0.001), similar proportions discontinued treatment due to adverse events (13 vs. 10%), and a slightly greater proportion in the ABC/COM group reported serious adverse events (13 vs. 8%). About half of the latter comprised suspected ABC-related hypersensitivity reactions (overall rate, 6%). Most adverse events were gastrointestinal in nature in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: ABC/COM was at least equivalent to IDV/COM over 48 weeks in the treatment of antiretroviral-naïve patients. ABC/COM was associated with a significantly higher adherence rate and lower incidence of drug-related adverse events than IDV/COM. The study was limited in that it was not powered to determine equivalence of treatments within high vs. low viral load strata, adherence was not monitored electronically, and bias could not be ruled out due to the open-label study design.

Mutations in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase during therapy with abacavir, lamivudine and zidovudine in HIV-1-infected adults with no prior antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) drug resistance in patients receiving abacavir, lamivudine and zidovudine therapy. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study, 173 antiretroviral treatment-naive HIV-1-infected adults received abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine or lamivudine/zidovudine for up to 48 weeks. After week 16, patients could switch to open-label abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine, and those with plasma HIV-1 RNA (vRNA) > 400 copies/ml could add other antiretrovirals. From weeks 11 to 48, samples with vRNA > 400 copies/ml were collected for genotyping and phenotyping. RESULTS: At baseline, 90% of isolates were wild-type (WT). At week 16, vRNA was > 400 copies/ml in seven of 72 (10% patients receiving abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine and in 41 of 66 (62%) receiving lamivudine/ zidovudine. At week 16, the genotypes in isolates from the abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine group were M184V alone (n = 3 cases), WT (n = 3) and M184V plus thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) (n = 1). The genotypes in isolates from the lamivudine/zidovudine group were M184V alone (n = 37), WT ( n= 1) and M184V plus TAMs (n = 3). In the four cases where M184V plus TAMs were detected some mutations were present at baseline. Despite detectable M184V in 74% of patients on lamivudine/zidovudine, addition of abacavir with or without another antiretroviral therapy resulted in a reduction in vRNA, with 42 of 65 (65%) patients having week 48 vRNA < 400 copies/ml (intent-to-treat with missing = failure). At week 48, the most common genotype was M184V alone in the abacavir/ lamivudine/zidovudine group (median vRNA 1-2 log,10 below baseline), and M184V with or without TAMs in patients originally assigned to lamivudine/zidovudine. At week 48, phenotypic results were obtained for 11 isolates for patients from both arms, and all had reduced susceptibility to lamivudine but all remained sensitive to stavudine, all protease inhibitors and all non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Three, three and two isolates had reduced susceptibility to abacavir, didanosine and zidovudine, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Abacavir retained efficacy against isolates with the M184V genotype alone. TAMs did not develop during 48 weeks of abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine therapy and were uncommon when abacavir was added after 16 weeks of lamivudine/zidovudine therapy. Limited mutations upon rebound on this triple nucleoside combination allows for several subsequent treatment options.