Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
ANZ J Surg ; 90(9): 1705-1709, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32783322

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether angioembolization is an appropriate alternative method for the management of blunt renal trauma in haemodynamically unstable patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted from 2002 to 2012 at three tertiary trauma hospitals in the state of Queensland. Patients who had blunt renal trauma and underwent renal angioembolization or had a trauma nephrectomy were identified using patient records and operating theatre and interventional radiology databases. The inclusion criteria were - haemodynamically unstable patients with blunt renal trauma treated with angioembolization, above the age of 16 years. Patients who underwent angioembolization for other causes such as: penetrating renal trauma, post-procedure, renal tumours, renal angiomyolipomas or arteriovenous malformations were excluded. Patients below the age of 16 were also excluded. Post-embolization renal function, blood pressure, morbidity and mortality were analysed using the paired t2 test. RESULTS: A total of 668 renal trauma patients were identified during this period. Sixteen patients underwent angioembolization for blunt renal trauma. Post-procedure renal function normalized without any hypertension with the median follow up being 4 months. Four patients had post-embolization complications including a urinoma, two devascularized kidneys and one ureteric stricture requiring nephrectomy. There was no mortality. CONCLUSION: Selective angioembolization, where feasible, is an alternative method in the management of haemodynamically stable patients with blunt renal trauma maximizing nephron sparing and producing acceptable long-term outcomes with avoidance of the morbidity of trauma nephrectomy. This is the first study that we know of in Australia analysing the outcome of angioembolization for blunt renal trauma.


Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Adolescente , Austrália/epidemiologia , Hospitais Públicos , Humanos , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem , Rim/lesões , Rim/cirurgia , Queensland , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia
2.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 59(1): 39-46, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25492556

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to review the New Zealand-wide experience of thoracic endovascular aortic repair to determine effect of age on outcome. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective analytic study comparing two age groups. The New Zealand Thoracic Aortic Stent (NZTAS) registry was reviewed for patient demographics, indications for repair, risk factors, technical success, complications, length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The 264 patients were divided into two groups: <80 (Group I, n = 245) and >80 years on the day of the procedure (Group II, n = 19). Group II comprised 11 males and 8 females with a mean age (range) of 84 (80-90) years. Using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons's scoring system for risk factors, there was no significant difference between the groups. Technical success was 84% (n = 16) in Group II. The mean hospital stay in Group II was 20 (2-90) days and the in-hospital mortality 16% (n = 3). None of these outcomes was significantly different to those in the under 80 group (Group I). CONCLUSIONS: Data from NZTAS registry show outcomes and risk factors do not significantly differ between the two age groups.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/mortalidade , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aorta Torácica/lesões , Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nova Zelândia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
ANZ J Surg ; 84(11): 866-70, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24286673

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that infrapopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is a reasonable primary therapy for critical limb ischaemia (CLI). Based on the transatlantic intersociety consensus (TASC) classification, this has been found to be true for lesions classified as A, B or C. We report our experience with infrapopliteal PTA stratified by TASC classification. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients who underwent infrapopliteal PTA with or without stenting from October 2007 to July 2011 was conducted, revealing 83 limbs. The primary outcome variables were freedom from reintervention and freedom from index limb amputation. Secondary outcomes were technical success, post-operative complications and survival. TASC classification was assessed for the individual vessel(s) chosen for intervention. RESULTS: Median age was 76 years and radiological success was 86.75%. Average follow-up was 15 months. At 1 and 2 years, freedom from re-intervention, or amputation was 65.1% and 55.6%. Limb salvage was 77.7%. Within 2 years, 2% underwent bypass and 18% repeat infrapopliteal PTA. The 30-day mortality was 5%. Overall survival was 84.5%, 71.8% and 61.6% at 1, 2 and 3 years. Eighty-two per cent were classified as TASC D lesions. Radiological success was achieved in 100% of TASC C lesions in contrast to 86.7% of TASC D lesions. There was not a statistically significant relationship between primary outcomes and TASC D classification. DISCUSSION: Given the encouragingly high rates of radiological success and limb salvage, an attempt at PTA is indicated as an alternative to primary amputation even in patients with radiologically demonstrated severe disease.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão/métodos , Consenso , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Isquemia/cirurgia , Perna (Membro)/irrigação sanguínea , Artéria Poplítea/cirurgia , Sociedades Médicas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angiografia , Angioplastia com Balão/normas , Procedimentos Endovasculares/normas , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Artéria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Poplítea/fisiopatologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Queensland/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
4.
Radiology ; 264(2): 473-83, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22668564

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the type and frequency of errors during vascular interventional radiology (VIR) and design and implement an intervention to reduce error and improve efficiency in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethical guidance was sought from the Research Services Department at Imperial College London. Informed consent was not obtained. Field notes were recorded during 55 VIR procedures by a single observer. Two blinded assessors identified failures from field notes and categorized them into one or more errors by using a 22-part classification system. The potential to cause harm, disruption to procedural flow, and preventability of each failure was determined. A preprocedural team rehearsal (PPTR) was then designed and implemented to target frequent preventable potential failures. Thirty-three procedures were observed subsequently to determine the efficacy of the PPTR. Nonparametric statistical analysis was used to determine the effect of intervention on potential failure rates, potential to cause harm and procedural flow disruption scores (Mann-Whitney U test), and number of preventable failures (Fisher exact test). RESULTS: Before intervention, 1197 potential failures were recorded, of which 54.6% were preventable. A total of 2040 errors were deemed to have occurred to produce these failures. Planning error (19.7%), staff absence (16.2%), equipment unavailability (12.2%), communication error (11.2%), and lack of safety consciousness (6.1%) were the most frequent errors, accounting for 65.4% of the total. After intervention, 352 potential failures were recorded. Classification resulted in 477 errors. Preventable failures decreased from 54.6% to 27.3% (P < .001) with implementation of PPTR. Potential failure rates per hour decreased from 18.8 to 9.2 (P < .001), with no increase in potential to cause harm or procedural flow disruption per failure. CONCLUSION: Failures during VIR procedures are largely because of ineffective planning, communication error, and equipment difficulties, rather than a result of technical or patient-related issues. Many of these potential failures are preventable. A PPTR is an effective means of targeting frequent preventable failures, reducing procedural delays and improving patient safety.


Assuntos
Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Radiografia Intervencionista/métodos , Doenças Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Vasculares/terapia , Eficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Segurança do Paciente , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Skull Base ; 13(2): 113-117, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15912168

RESUMO

The Tullio phenomenon is an extremely rare condition in which loud noise induces a brisk vestibular response. Osteomas of the middle ear cleft are also uncommon. We report a patient with an osteoma of the middle ear cleft that became symptomatic with progressive facial palsy and mixed hearing loss. The onset was heralded by the Tullio phenomenon, which she had experienced for 10 years. The differential diagnosis of the Tullio phenomenon and the management of middle ear osteomas are discussed.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...