Infliximab for Refractory Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is frequently difficult to treat. Infliximab (IFX) is useful for extracardiac sarcoidosis, but its use in CS has been limited due to concerns about cardiotoxicity and an FDA blackbox warning about use in heart failure. We reviewed 36 consecutive patients treated with infliximab for CS refractory to standard therapies. IFX was initiated for patients with refractory dysrhythmias, moderate to severe cardiomyopathy, and evidence of persistent F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography scan, despite standard therapies. We compared the prednisone dose, ejection fraction (EF), and dysrhythmias before and after IFX therapy. The prednisone-equivalent steroid dose decreased from a median of 20 mg at initiation of infliximab to 7.5 at 6 months and 5 mg at 12 months postinitiation of infliximab (p <0.001). In the 25 patients with serial EF measurements, no statistically significant difference was detected in EF (41% at baseline, 42% at 6 months). Of the 16 patients with serial dysrhythmia data, there was a trend toward reduction of percent of patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT), from 32% at baseline, to 22% at 6 months and 19% at 12 months (p = 0.07). Adverse events were common, occurring in 6 of 36 patients, with 3 of 36 patients stopping infliximab for a prolonged period. In responder analysis, 24 patients improved in at least 1 of 3 outcome categories. In conclusion, infliximab may be useful for refractory cardiac sarcoidosis.

Efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin for small fiber neuropathy associated with sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is commonly associated with sarcoidosis and can cause significant morbidity to afflicted patients. The appropriate treatment of this condition, when associated with sarcoidosis, is not well established. METHODS: Descriptive case series of three patients with sarcoidosis and SFN. The presenting clinical features, skin biopsy results, autonomic reflex screen and quantitative sudomotor axon reflex testing (QSART) findings, and response to therapy are delineated. RESULTS: We describe three patients with biopsy-proven sarcoidosis who developed intractable neuropathic pain and/or symptoms related to associated autonomic dysfunction despite treatment with various immunosuppressive medications and narcotic analgesics. QSART showed evidence of a postganglionic sudomotor abnormality in one patient and was normal in the other two. Skin biopsy findings were abnormal, demonstrating a non-length-dependent sensory SFN in all three patients. Painful neuropathic symptoms, as well as symptoms related to dysautonomia from SFN responded significantly to treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). CONCLUSION: IVIG appears to be effective in relieving symptoms from SFN associated with sarcoidosis, suggesting an underlying immune mechanism. Larger prospective, controlled studies would be needed to confirm this response to IVIG and to further elucidate the underlying pathobiology behind this association with sarcoidosis.

Infliximab therapy rescues cyclophosphamide failure in severe central nervous system sarcoidosis.

Central nervous system involvement is a severe manifestation of sarcoidosis that often requires aggressive immunosuppressive therapy. The most efficacious approach for refractory disease is unknown. We reviewed the cases of four subjects who demonstrated active progression of neurosarcoidosis while under treatment with cyclophosphamide, and who were subsequently treated with infliximab. All four subjects demonstrated rapid and substantial reversal of their clinical course. Radiologic findings were concordant with the clinical responses. There were no notable toxicities. Treatment with infliximab may be more effective than cyclophosphamide for refractory central nervous system sarcoidosis. A larger, prospective study is warranted.