Reciprocal influences between ambulatorial peritoneal dialysis and pulmonary function.

The aim of this study was to verify if dialysis solution volumes used in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) interfere with pulmonary function and if the pulmonary volumes interfere with the lymphatic absorption of the peritoneal cavity. We submitted 10 CAPD patients with a mean age of 48 +/- 18 years and on CAPD for 35 +/- 27 months to the following evaluations: first, measurement of the lymphatic absorption from the peritoneal cavity; second, measurement of the hydrostatic intraperitoneal pressure; and third, expirometry with the peritoneal cavity full of dialysis solution and empty. There were no differences between the expirometry results obtained with the peritoneal cavity full and empty of dialysis solution, and the results were in accordance with the prediction for this population. The values did not correlate with the peritoneal lymphatic absorption of the peritoneal cavity. The cumulative lymphatic absorption of the peritoneal cavity after 4 h dialysis solution permanence was 197 +/- 93 ml, and the hydrostatic intraperitoneal pressure was 13.9 +/- 2.8 column centimeters of water. Neither of these correlated with pulmonary volumes. In conclusion, CAPD did not interfere with the pulmonary function, nor did the pulmonary function influence the lymphatic absorption of the peritoneal cavity of these patients.

The effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on the healing of exit sites of peritoneal dialysis catheters in rats.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of intraperitoneal (i.p.) antibiotic (AB) prophylaxis on the quality of healing and infection rates of exit sites in peritoneal dialysis catheters. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-one Sprague-Dawley rats were dialyzed 3 times per day for 6 weeks. Dianeal solution containing AB was used for all the rats during the first 5 days. The animals were randomized on the sixth day into three groups: group A (AB-free after randomization), group B (AB for 3 weeks), and group C (AB during 6 weeks). Scores were given to each exit site according to the observation. Mean scores from each group were compared in an attempt to find significant differences between the groups. Dialysate and exit-site drainage samples were taken weekly for microbiology. RESULTS: Eight episodes of peritonitis were diagnosed, six in group A and two in group B. The most common bacteria causing peritonitis were gram-negative rods. The mean scores were not significantly different between groups C and B throughout the study, even after the discontinuation of the prophylaxis. Group A, when compared to the other two groups, had significantly higher scores after the second week and throughout the rest of the study. CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal antibiotic prophylaxis for 3 weeks after catheter implantation is an effective way to prevent early colonization of exit sites, providing a better healing quality and lower incidence of catheter-related infection. Although the extension of the prophylaxis for 6 weeks seems to be beneficial, it was not statistically proven in this study.

The absence of toxicity in intraperitoneal iron dextran administration: a functional and histological analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of iron dextran intraperitoneal administration on the function and histology of the peritoneum in rats undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized experimental study. MATERIALS: Fifty-four Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into five groups: 3 study groups--high dose group (H), n = 12; intermediate dose (M), n = 12; and low dose group (L), n = 12--a dialysis control group (D), n = 12; and a tissue control (C), n = 7. INTERVENTIONS: The study groups were given Dianeal containing iron dextran in a concentration of 0.5, 0.25, and 0.125 mg/L (groups H, M, and L respectively). Group D was given standard Dianeal. Group C was never dialyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A 2-hour peritoneal equilibrium test (PET) was performed on the eighth day, at 3 months, and at 6 months. After the final PET, the animals were sacrificed and the peritoneal membrane was evaluated by gross inspection and light microscopy (silver, prussian blue, and trichrome staining). RESULTS: Peritoneal transport of small solutes followed the same pattern in all groups, increasing over time. The peritonitis index was similar in the groups. No iron deposits or morphologic differences were seen in the gross inspection of the peritoneal cavity. No peritoneal iron deposition was detected in the histological analysis with prussian blue staining. No differences were noted in the light microscopic analysis of the mesothelial cell layer (silver staining), nor did the morphometric analysis of the submesothelial space show any differences in thickness between the groups. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest the absence of toxic effects of iron dextran on the peritoneal cavity of rats in the concentrations studied. Further studies should be performed to evaluate the effectiveness of these dosages delivered intraperitoneally to maintain iron homeostasis.