Analysis of Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors Influencing the Adherence to a Web-based Intervention Among Patients after Acute Coronary Syndrome: a Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Background: Although telemedicine has been proven to have significant potential for improving cardiac patient care, there remains a substantial risk of introducing disparities linked to the utilization of digital technology, especially for older or socially vulnerable subgroups. OBJECTIVE: We investigated factors influencing adherence to a telemedicine-delivered health education intervention in ischemic patients, emphasizing demographic and socioeconomic considerations. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive, observational, prospective cohort study in consecutive patients referred to our cardiology center for acute coronary syndrome, from February 2022 to January 2023. Patients were invited to join a web-based health educational meeting (WHEM) after hospital discharge, as part of a secondary prevention program. The WHEM sessions were scheduled monthly and used a teleconference software program for remote synchronous videoconferencing, accessible through standard computer, tablet, or smartphone based on patient preference or availability. RESULTS: Out of the 252 patients (median age 70 years [interquartile range: 61.0-77.3 years]; 189 males [75%]), 98 (39%) declined the invitation to participate in the WHEM. The reasons for non-acceptance were mainly challenges in handling digital technology (70/98, 71.4%), followed by lack of confidence in telemedicine as an integrative tool for managing their medical condition (45/98, 45.9%), and lack of Internet-connected devices (43/98, 43.8%). Out of the 154 patients who agreed to participate in the WHEM, 40 (26%) were unable to attend. Univariable logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of a caregiver with digital proficiency and a higher education level were associated with increased likelihood of attendance to the WHEM, while the converse was true for increasing age and female gender. After multivariable adjustment, higher education level (odds ratio, 2.26 [95% confidence interval, 1.53-3.32], p<0.001) and caregiver with digital proficiency (odds ratio, 12.83 [95% confidence interval, 5.93-27.75], p<0.001) remained independently associated with the outcome. The model discrimination was good even when corrected for optimism (optimism corrected C-index, 0.812), as was the agreement between observed and predicted probability of participation (optimism corrected calibration intercept and slope, 0.010 and 0.948). CONCLUSIONS: The current study identifies a notable lack of suitability for a specific cohort of ischemic patients to participate in our telemedicine intervention, emphasizing the risk of digital marginalization for a significant portion of the population. Addressing low digital literacy rates among patients or their informal caregivers, and overcoming cultural bias against remote care, were identified as critical issues in our study findings to facilitate the broader adoption of telemedicine as an inclusive tool in healthcare.

Relation of QRS duration to response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is the most reliable electrocardiographic predictor of responsiveness to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, not all patients with LBBB will respond to CRT. Our aim was to investigate the interaction between QRS duration, LBBB-type morphology, and the responsiveness to CRT. We retrospectively analyzed electrocardiograms of 243 patients who underwent CRT implantation according to current clinical indications. A 6-month reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume >15% was used to identify CRT responders. The clinical end point consisted of death, hospitalization for heart failure and sustained rapid ventricular tachyarrhythmias. An LBBB morphology was present in 169 patients (70%) and 101 of these (60%) were responders to CRT. Analyzing the interaction between QRS duration and CRT responsiveness in patients with LBBB, a "U shaped" distribution resulted, with nonresponders clustered between 120 and 130 ms and above 180 ms. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 178 ms as the optimal cut-off value of QRS to predict a nonresponsiveness to CRT (area under the curve = 0.67 [95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.76]). At multivariate analysis, only an ischemic cause and a QRS ≥178 ms were independent predictors of nonresponsiveness to CRT (area under the curve = 0.75). Patients with LBBB with QRS ≥178 ms had greater likelihood of adverse clinical events during a mean follow-up of 32 months (p = 0.049). In conclusion, in patients with LBBB undergoing CRT, a marked QRS widening (i.e., ≥178 ms) is related to worse echocardiographic responsiveness and lower event free survival rate compared with patients with an intermediate QRS widening.

Is there an association between depression and cardiovascular mortality or sudden death?

The results of many studies and recent meta-analyses strongly suggest that depression is a risk factor for total and cardiovascular mortality, both in the general population and in patients with known heart disease. By contrast, the association between depression and sudden death or cardiac arrest has received little attention. This issue has been investigated in three recent studies; two were carried out in the general population and showed depression to be a independent risk factor for sudden death. The other study was carried out in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI); the adjusted relative risk (RR) of sudden death was significantly increased in depressed patients but, after adjustment for dyspnea/fatigue (a common symptom for heart disease and depression), the RR was no longer statistically significant. However, when the cognitive-affective depressive symptoms were examined separately from the somatic ones (dyspnea/fatigue, etc.), there was a clear trend for an association between cognitive-affective symptoms and sudden death. Because a risk factor can be defined as 'independent' only in a multivariate analysis in which variables are dichotomized, the presence of common symptoms between heart disease and depression represents a very difficult problem. However, taken together, the results of studies carried out in the general population and in patients with AMI strongly suggest that depression is a significant risk factor for sudden death.

Successful treatment of electrical storm with oral quinidine in Brugada syndrome.

A patient implanted with a cardioverter-defibrillator for symptomatic Brugada syndrome was referred to our hospital 17 months later because of recurrent shocks due to ventricular fibrillation (VF). Isoprenaline was intravenously infused and prevented VF episodes, but VF recurred after every attempt of drug discontinuation. A total of 34 shocks were recorded over 25 days. Subsequently, we treated the patient with oral quinidine and the drug suppressed the electrical storm and prevented VF episodes during a follow-up period of 3 years. This case report, together with few others reported in the literature, suggests a role of oral quinidine in the treatment of electrical storm in Brugada syndrome.

Antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation: where are we?

In patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF), the hallmark of treatment has long been the use of antiarrhythmic drugs. The following strategies are available: a) any antiarrhythmic treatment; b) out-of-hospital episodic treatment ("pill-in-the-pocket" approach); c) prophylactic antiarrhythmic therapy; and d) hybrid therapy. The following patients with recurrent AF should not undergo any antiarrhythmic therapy: after the first AF episode; patients with rare, hemodynamically well-tolerated and short-lasting (a few hours) AF episodes; patients with perioperative AF, without history of recurrent AF; patients with AF during acute myocardial infarction or other acute diseases, without history of recurrent AF; and "holiday heart" syndrome. In patients with infrequent AF episodes (< 1 per month) and hemodynamically well-tolerated, but long enough to require emergency room intervention or hospitalization, a good treatment might be the "pill-in-the-pocket" approach, consisting of a single-dose oral ingestion of flecainide or propafenone at the time and place of palpitation onset. A recent Italian study has shown that this treatment is effective and safe. When AF episodes are frequent and/or hemodynamically badly tolerated, the treatment of choice is the prophylactic therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs. When these drugs fail (ineffective or not tolerated) a non-pharmacological treatment or a hybrid therapy may be indicated.