Stoma reversal after intended restorative rectal cancer resection in Denmark: nationwide population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Data on stoma reversal following restorative rectal resection (RRR) with a diverting stoma are conflicting. This study investigated a Danish population-based cohort of patients undergoing RRR to evaluate factors predictive of stoma reversal during 3 years of follow-up. METHODS: Patients from national registries with rectal cancer undergoing RRR or Hartmann's procedure with curative intent between May 2001 and April 2012 were included. Patients with a diverting stoma were followed from the time of primary rectal cancer resection to date of stoma reversal, death, emigration, or end of 3-year follow-up. The cumulative incidence proportion (CIP) of stoma reversal at 1 and 3 years was calculated, treating death as a competing risk. Factors predictive of stoma reversal were explored using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 6859 patients included, 35·7, 41·9 and 22·4 per cent respectively had a RRR with a diverting stoma, RRR without a stoma, and Hartmann's procedure with an end-colostomy. In patients with a diverting stoma, the CIP of stoma reversal was 70·3 (95 per cent c.i. 68·4 to 72·1) per cent after 1 year, and 74·3 (72·5 to 76·0) per cent after 3 years. Neoadjuvant treatment (hazard ratio (HR) 0·75, 95 per cent c.i. 0·66 to 0·85), blood loss greater than 300 ml (HR 0·86, 0·76 to 0·97), anastomotic leak (HR 0·41, 0·33 to 0·50), T3 category (HR 0·63, 0·47 to 0·83), T4 category (HR 0·62, 0·42 to 0·90) and UICC stage IV (HR 0·57, 0·41 to 0·80) were possible predictors of delayed stoma reversal. CONCLUSION: In one-quarter of the patients the diverting stoma had not been reversed 3 years after the intended RRR procedure.

ANTECEDENTES: Los datos sobre el cierre del estoma (stoma reversal, SR) tras la exéresis el recto con intención reconstructiva (restorative rectal resection, RRR) y estoma derivativo (diverting stoma, DS) son contradictorios. Este estudio analizó los factores predictivos del SR en una cohorte danesa de base poblacional de pacientes sometidos a RRR con un seguimiento de 3 años. MÉTODOS: Los pacientes con cáncer de recto a los que se realizó una RRR o una operación de Hartmann (Hartmann's operation, HO) con intención curativa desde mayo de 2001 hasta abril de 2012, se seleccionaron a partir de registros nacionales. Los pacientes con SD fueron seguidos desde la resección primaria del cáncer rectal hasta la fecha del SR, del fallecimiento, de su cambio de residencia o hasta el final del seguimiento (3 años). Se calculó la tasa de incidencia acumulada (cumulative incidence proportion, CIP) de RS a 1 y 3 años utilizando la muerte como factor de riesgo competitivo. Se identificaron los factores predictivos de SR mediante regresión múltiple de Cox. RESULTADOS: De los 6.859 pacientes incluidos, el 35,7%, 41,9% y 22,4% tenían una RRR con DS, una RRR sin estoma y una HO con colostomía terminal, respectivamente. En pacientes con SD, el CIP de SR fue del 70,3% (i.c. del 95%: 68,4-72,1) al año y del 74,3% (i.c. del 95%: 72,5-76,0) a los 3 años. Se identificaron como posibles factores predictivos relacionados con el retraso del SR, el tratamiento neoadyuvante (cociente de riesgos instantáneos, hazard ratio, HR 0,75; i.c. del 95% 0,66-0,85), una pérdida de sangre > 300 mL (HR 0,86; i.c. del 95% 0,76-0,97), la fuga anastomótica (HR 0,41; i.c. del 95% 0,33-0,50), las categorías T3 (HR 0,63; i.c. del 95% 0,47-0,83) y T4 (HR 0,62; i.c. del 95% 0,42-0,90) y el estadio IV UICC (HR 0,57; i.c. del 95%: 0,41-0,80). CONCLUSIÓN: En una cuarta parte de los pacientes no se había cerrado el estoma derivativo tres años después de la resección de cáncer rectal con intención reconstructiva.

Impact of a multidisciplinary training programme on outcome of upper rectal cancer by critical appraisal of the extent of mesorectal excision with postoperative MRI.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of patients with upper rectal cancer remains unclear. Partial mesorectal excision (PME) without neoadjuvant therapy is currently advocated for the majority of patients. Recent studies, however, reported a high risk of local recurrence and suboptimal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a quality assurance initiative with postoperative MRI to improve outcomes in these patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent mesorectal excision with curative intent for rectal cancer in 2007-2013 were included. Postoperative MRI of the pelvis was performed 1 year after surgery. In 2011, a multidisciplinary workshop with focus on extent and completeness of surgery was held for training surgeons, pathologists and radiologists involved in treatment planning. Images of residual mesorectum and histopathological reports were reviewed with regard to the distal resection margin. Local recurrence after a minimum of 3 years' follow-up was compared between two cohorts from 2007-2010 and 2011-2013. RESULTS: A total of 627 patients were included; postoperative MRI of the pelvis was done in 381 patients. The 3-year actuarial local recurrence rate in patients with upper rectal cancer improved from 12·9 to 5·0 per cent (P = 0·012). After the workshop, fewer patients with cancer of the upper rectum were selected to have PME (90·8 per cent in 2007-2010 versus 80·2 per cent in 2011-2013; P = 0·023), and fewer patients who underwent PME had an insufficient distal resection margin (61·7 versus 31 per cent respectively; P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: Quality assessment of surgical practice may have a major impact on oncological outcome after surgery for upper rectal cancer.

ANTECEDENTES: El tratamiento óptimo para los pacientes con cáncer del tercio superior de recto no está claro. En este momento, la conducta más empleada es la exéresis parcial del mesorrecto (partial mesorectal excision, PME) sin tratamiento neoadyuvante. Sin embargo, estudios recientes han apuntado que se trata de una cirugía subóptima con un elevado riesgo de recidiva local. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar los efectos de una iniciativa de control de calidad con una resonancia magnética (magnetic resonance imaging, MRI) postoperatoria para mejorar los resultados en estos pacientes. MÉTODOS: Se incluyeron los pacientes con cáncer rectal a los que se realizó una exéresis del mesorrecto con intención curativa entre los años 2007 y 2013. Un año después de la cirugía se realizó una MRI de la pelvis. En el 2011, se organizó un taller multidisciplinario para educar a los cirujanos, patólogos y radiólogos involucrados en la planificación del tratamiento, en el que se discutieron la extensión y la radicalidad de la cirugía. Se revisaron las imágenes de mesorrecto residual y los informes histopatológicos respecto al margen de resección distal. Se comparó la recidiva local después de más de 3 años de seguimiento entre dos cohortes temporales, 2007-2010 y 2011-2013, respectivamente. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron un total de 627 pacientes, en los que en 381 se realizó una MRI postoperatoria de la pelvis. Las tasa actuarial de recidiva local a 3 años en pacientes con cáncer del tercio superior de recto mejoraron del 12,9% al 5,0% (P = 0,012). Después del taller, se realizaron menos PME en pacientes con cáncer del tercio superior de recto (91% versus 80%, P = 0,023) y menos pacientes en los que se realizó una PME presentaron un margen de resección distal insuficiente (62% versus 31%, P < 0,001). CONCLUSIÓN: La evaluación de la calidad de la práctica quirúrgica puede tener un gran impacto en los resultados oncológicos después de la cirugía del cáncer del tercio superior de recto.

Pelvic insufficiency fractures frequently occur following preoperative chemo-radiotherapy for rectal cancer - a nationwide MRI study.

AIM: The aim of this prospective case-control study was to evaluate the rate of pelvic insufficiency fractures (PIFs) in Denmark using MRI at the 3-year follow-up. All patients had rectal cancer and had undergone surgery with or without preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). METHOD: Patients registered with primary rectal cancer in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database, who underwent rectal cancer resection from April 2011 through August 2012, were invited to participate in a national MRI study aiming to detect local recurrence and evaluate quality of the surgical treatment. Pelvic MRI including bone-specific sequences 3 years after treatment was obtained. The primary outcome was the rate of PIFs; secondary outcome was risk factors of PIFs evaluated in multivariate analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 890 patients underwent rectal cancer surgery. Of these, 403 patients were included in the MRI study and had a 3-year follow-up MRI. PIFs were detected in 49 (12.2%; 95% CI 9.0-15.4) patients by MRI. PIFs were detected in 39 patients (33.6%; 95% CI 24.9-42.3) treated with preoperative CRT compared to 10 (3.5%; 95% CI 1.3-5.6) non-irradiated patients (P < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis female gender (OR = 3.52; 95% CI 1.7-7.5), age above 65 years (OR = 3.20; 95% CI 1.5-6.9) and preoperative CRT (OR = 14.20; 95% CI 6.1-33.1) were significant risk factors for PIFs. CONCLUSION: Preoperative CRT in the treatment of rectal cancer was associated with a 14-fold higher risk of PIFs after 3 years, whereas female gender and age above 65 years each tripled the risk of PIFs.

Neoadjuvant therapy abolishes the functional benefits of a larger rectal remnant, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging after restorative rectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: The combination of advances in surgical technique and neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer has resulted in more patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery. Unfortunately, numerous patients subsequently experience bowel dysfunction, and may suffer from lifelong severe disability with major impact on their quality of life. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the risk of severe LARS in patients was associated with the length of remnant rectum. METHODS: A total of 125 patients who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer were included. Postoperative bowel function was assessed using the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score a minimum of one year following surgery. The length of remnant rectum was measured on postoperative MRI of the pelvis and was correlated with the risk of having major LARS. RESULTS: Overall, major LARS was observed in 38 per cent of patients. In the patients who underwent surgery alone, major LARS was reported by 27 per cent, and a larger remnant rectum was associated with a better functional outcome. In contrast, 80 per cent of patients who underwent combined preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery reported having major LARS. No association between the length of remnant rectum and the risk of major LARS was observed in patients treated with combined neoadjuvant therapy and surgery. CONCLUSION: Both the length of remnant rectum and preoperative chemoradiotherapy had a major impact on the severity of bowel dysfunction after restorative rectal cancer surgery. No functional benefit from an irradiated rectal remnant was observed.

Long-term function and morphology of the anal sphincters and the pelvic floor after primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury.

AIM: More than 50% of women experience deteriorating continence over time following primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. The objectives of this study were to assess the function and morphology of the anal sphincters and pelvic floor in women with long-term faecal incontinence after sphincter repair (primary end-point) and to evaluate their correlation with severity of incontinence (secondary end-point). METHOD: The participants in this prospective study were recruited from a cohort of all women who sustained third or fourth degree obstetric sphincter injury reconstruction (cases) from January 1976 to November 1991. The women who delivered immediately before and after each case, without sustaining obstetric damage, were included as controls. Cases and controls were stratified into three categories: (i) continent; (ii) minor incontinence; and (iii) severe incontinence. The function and morphology of the anal sphincters and pelvic floor were evaluated by MRI, three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and anorectal physiology tests. RESULTS: Fifty-nine women (29 cases/30 controls; mean age 51/53 years; mean follow-up 23.7/24.1 years, respectively) were assessed. Morphologically, cases had a significantly shorter anterior external anal sphincter length compared with controls when evaluated by three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography (8.6 vs 10.2 mm; P = 0.03). Functionally, cases with severe incontinence had a significantly shorter anterior sphincter length compared with cases with minor incontinence (7.7 vs 10.4 mm; P = 0.04). No correlation could be found between anal pressures and severity of incontinence in the case group. CONCLUSIONS: Cases had a significantly shorter anterior external anal sphincter length. Functionally, anterior sphincter length correlated with increased severity of incontinence.