Chondrosarcoma of the mobile spine: a review of 21 cases treated at a single center.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of modern surgical and aggressive radiation techniques on outcome in patients with spinal chondrosarcoma. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chondrosarcoma of the spine presents a difficult surgical challenge. Surgical excision is considered the standard of care, yet complete excision is not always feasible, and rates of local control and survival are inferior to those reported for the extremities. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of cases of chondrosarcoma involving the spine above the sacrum treated surgically at our institution between 1984 and 2006. Medical charts, radiology reports, pathology reports, and operative notes were reviewed for all patients. Available imaging studies were also reviewed. The Student t test and Fisher exact test were used to compare baseline differences between groups. Survivorship analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Overall survival was calculated on the basis of en bloc resection, margins, local recurrence, and metastasis. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were treated surgically for chondrosarcoma of the mobile spine. Twenty of the 21 patients were also treated with radiation with a mean dose of 71 Gy (range, 53-83). The average overall survival for all patients in our series was 120.5 months (SE = 32.9; range, 8.5-298.9 months). The 1- and 5-year survival rates for all patients were 90% and 61%, respectively. Patients treated with en bloc resection had a better overall survival (198 months: SE = 24.5; range, 24-224.7 months) than those who underwent intralesional excision (77 months: SE = 27.3; range, 8.5-298.9 months) (P = 0.05). Five (24%) patients developed local recurrence and 9 (43%) developed metastasis. All recurrences occurred in patients who underwent intralesional resection. Metastasis, high-grade tumor, and positive surgical margins were associated with worse overall survival (P < 0.001, 0.02, and 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this series, en bloc resection, the absence of metastasis, low-grade tumors, and negative margins were associated with improved overall survival. The aggressive use of sophisticated surgical and radiation techniques appears to confer an advantage to patients, decreasing local recurrence and increasing overall survival, even following incomplete surgical resection.

Osteosarcoma of the spine: experience in 26 patients treated at the Massachusetts General Hospital.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Because of the low incidence, treatment recommendations for spinal osteosarcoma are guided by the results of small series and case reports. Many include patients who presented for treatment over the course of three to four decades. PURPOSE: The goal of this investigation was to report the treatments, results, and overall survivorship of 26 patients treated for osteosarcoma of the spine at a single institution. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective prognostic series (Level III evidence). PATIENT SAMPLE: Twenty-six patients treated at a single center for osteosarcoma of the spine over a 26-year period. OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimation of patient survival, local recurrence, and the presence of metastatic disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of cases of osteosarcoma involving the spine treated at our institution between 1982 and 2008. Medical charts, radiology reports, pathology reports, and operative notes were reviewed for all patients. Available imaging studies were also reviewed. The log-rank test was used to compare baseline differences between groups. Survivorship analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methodology. The effect of Paget osteosarcoma, type of resection, presence of local recurrence, tumor size, surgical margins, and metastases on overall survival were also investigated using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included for review in this study. Twenty individuals were treated surgically, and 24 were treated with radiation with a mean dose of 62.2 Gy (range 20-84.7 Gy). Twenty-five patients received chemotherapy. Of those treated surgically, seven received en bloc resection. The median overall survival for all patients in our series was 29.5 months (standard error 14.7, 95% confidence interval 0.6-58). Local recurrence developed in 7 patients (27%), and metastasis occurred in 16 individuals (62%). Patients with Paget osteosarcoma had worse overall survival (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Results presented here confirm a poor prognosis for patients with spinal osteosarcoma. Although combination therapies, including surgery, chemotherapy, and high-dose radiation, achieve adequate short-term survival, the 5-year mortality rate remains high.

Phase II study of high-dose photon/proton radiotherapy in the management of spine sarcomas.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy (XRT) for spine sarcomas is constrained by spinal cord, nerve, and viscera tolerance. Negative surgical margins are uncommon; hence, doses of >or=66 Gy are recommended. A Phase II clinical trial evaluated high-dose photon/proton XRT for spine sarcomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients had nonmetastatic, thoracic, lumbar, and/or sacral spine/paraspinal sarcomas. Treatment included pre- and/or postoperative photon/proton XRT with or without radical resection; patients with osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma received chemotherapy. Shrinking fields delivered 50.4 cobalt Gray equivalent (Gy RBE) to subclinical disease, 70.2 Gy RBE to microscopic disease in the tumor bed, and 77.4 Gy RBE to gross disease at 1.8 Gy RBE qd. Doses were reduced for radiosensitive histologies, concurrent chemoradiation, or when diabetes or autoimmune disease present. Spinal cord dose was limited to 63/54 Gy RBE to surface/center. Intraoperative boost doses of 7.5 to 10 Gy could be given by dural plaque. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients (29 chordoma, 14 chondrosarcoma, 7 other) underwent gross total (n = 25) or subtotal (n = 12) resection or biopsy (n = 13). With 48 month median follow-up, 5-year actuarial local control, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival are: 78%, 63%, and 87% respectively. Two of 36 (5.6%) patients treated for primary versus 7/14 (50%) for recurrent tumor developed local recurrence (p < 0.001). Five patients developed late radiation-associated complications; no myelopathy developed but three sacral neuropathies appeared after 77.12 to 77.4 Gy RBE. CONCLUSIONS: Local control with this treatment is high in patients radiated at the time of primary presentation. Spinal cord dose constraints appear to be safe. Sacral nerves receiving 77.12-77.4 Gy RBE are at risk for late toxicity.

Combination short-course preoperative irradiation, surgical resection, and reduced-field high-dose postoperative irradiation in the treatment of tumors involving the bone.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and outcomes of combination short-course preoperative radiation, resection, and reduced-field (tumor bed without operative field coverage) high-dose postoperative radiation for patients with solid tumors mainly involving the spine and pelvis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1982 and 2006, a total of 48 patients were treated using this treatment strategy for solid tumors involving bone. Radiation treatments used both photons and protons. RESULTS: Of those treated, 52% had chordoma, 31% had chondrosarcoma, 8% had osteosarcoma, and 4% had Ewing's sarcoma, with 71% involving the pelvis/sacrum and 21% elsewhere in the spine. Median preoperative dose was 20 Gy, with a median of 50.4 Gy postoperatively. With 31.8-month median follow-up, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate is 65%; 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, 53.8%; and 5-year local control (LC) rate, 72%. There were no significant differences in OS, DFS, and LC according to histologic characteristics. Between primary and recurrent disease, there was no significant difference in OS rates (74.4% vs. 51.4%, respectively; p = 0.128), in contrast to DFS (71.5% vs. 18.3%; p = 0.0014) and LC rates (88.9% vs. 30.9%; p = 0.0011) favoring primary disease. After resection, 10 patients experienced delayed wound healing that did not significantly impact on OS, DFS, or LC. CONCLUSION: This approach is promising for patients with bone sarcomas in which resection will likely yield close/positive margins. It appears to inhibit tumor seeding with an acceptable rate of wound-healing complications. Dose escalation is accomplished without high-dose preoperative radiation (likely associated with higher rates of acute wound healing delays) or large-field postoperative radiation only (likely associated with late normal tissue toxicity). The LC and DFS rates are substantially better for patients with primary than recurrent sarcomas.

Intraoperative dural irradiation by customized 192iridium and 90yttrium brachytherapy plaques.

PURPOSE: After vertebral or paravertebral tumor resection, tumor cells may remain on the dura. Because a tumoricidal dose is difficult to achieve using external beam radiotherapy without exceeding the spinal cord tolerance, we developed intraoperative applicators to deliver additional dose to the dura. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eight patients with vertebral or paravertebral tumor underwent conformal external beam radiotherapy, tumor resection, and intraoperative radiotherapy to the dura involved by tumor. At surgery, vertebra, soft tissue, and epidural tumor were resected. A radioactive applicator plaque was placed on the dura to deliver 7.5-15 Gy, and then removed. Vertebral reconstruction and stabilization was completed. Chemotherapy was administered for large, high-grade sarcomas. RESULTS: We progressed through three plaque designs, initially (192)Ir, subsequently liquid (90)Y, and finally (90)Y foil in a semicylindrical polycarbonate plaque, in the treatment of 8 patients. The low-energy (90)Y beta-emissions provided a more attractive depth dose profile than that achievable with iridium and gave negligible staff radiation exposure. The (90)Y depth dose measured 29% at 2 mm and 9% at 4 mm from the surface of the foil plaque, with acceptable surface dose homogeneity. The average surface dose rate ranged from 18.7 to 47.6 cGy/min for the iridium plaques and 45.2 to 187.5 cGy/min for the (90)Y plaques. The treatments have been without acute or late neurologic complications. The disease of 6 of 8 patients was locally controlled at median potential follow-up of 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: The (90)Y foil applicator is technically elegant, easy to use, and superior to the earlier models. It has been incorporated into a protocol for spinal tumor treatment.