Malignancy outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with abatacept and other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: Results from a 10-year international post-marketing study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of malignancy (overall, breast, lung, and lymphoma) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with abatacept, conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and other biologic/targeted synthetic (b/ts)DMARDs in clinical practice. METHODS: Four international observational data sources were included: ARTIS (Sweden), RABBIT (Germany), FORWARD (USA), and BC (Canada). Crude incidence rates (IRs) per 1000 patient-years of exposure with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for a malignancy event were calculated; rate ratios (RRs) were estimated and adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and other potential confounders. RRs were then pooled in a random-effects model. RESULTS: Across data sources, mean follow-up for patients treated with abatacept (n = 5182), csDMARDs (n = 73,755), and other b/tsDMARDs (n = 37,195) was 3.0-3.7, 2.9-6.2, and 3.1-4.7 years, respectively. IRs per 1000 patient-years for overall malignancy ranged from 7.6-11.4 (abatacept), 8.6-13.2 (csDMARDs), and 5.0-11.8 (other b/tsDMARDs). IRs ranged from: 0-4.4, 0-3.3, and 0-2.5 (breast cancer); 0.1-2.8, 0-3.7, and 0.2-2.9 (lung cancer); and 0-1.1, 0-0.9, and 0-0.6 (lymphoma), respectively, for the three treatment groups. The numbers of individual cancers (breast, lung, and lymphoma) in some registries were low; RRs were not available. There were a few cases of lymphoma in some of the registries; ARTIS observed an RR of 2.8 (95% CI 1.1-6.8) with abatacept versus csDMARDs. The pooled RRs (95% CIs) for overall malignancy with abatacept were 1.1 (0.8-1.5) versus csDMARDs and 1.0 (0.8-1.3) versus b/tsDMARDs. CONCLUSIONS: This international, post-marketing observational safety study did not find any statistically significant increase in the risk of overall malignancies in pooled data in patients treated with abatacept compared with csDMARDs or with other b/tsDMARDs. Assessment of larger populations is needed to further evaluate the risks for individual cancers, especially lymphoma.

Infection outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with abatacept and other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: Results from a 10-year international post-marketing study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk of infections requiring hospitalization and opportunistic infections, including tuberculosis, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with abatacept versus conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and other biologic/targeted synthetic (b/ts) DMARDs. METHODS: Five international observational data sources were used: two biologic registries (Sweden, Germany), a disease registry (USA) and two healthcare claims databases (Canada, USA). Crude incidence rates (IRs) per 1000 patient-years, with 95 % CIs, were used to estimate rate ratios (RRs) comparing abatacept versus csDMARDs or other b/tsDMARDs. RRs were adjusted for demographic factors, comorbidities, and other potential confounders and then pooled across data sources using a random effects model (REM). RESULTS: The data sources included 6450 abatacept users, 136,636 csDMARD users and 54,378 other b/tsDMARD users, with a mean follow-up range of 2.2-6.2 years. Across data sources, the IRs for infections requiring hospitalization ranged from 16 to 56 for abatacept, 19-46 for csDMARDs, and 18-40 for other b/tsDMARDs. IRs for opportunistic infections were 0.4-7.8, 0.3-4.3, and 0.5-3.8; IRs for tuberculosis were 0.0-8.4, 0.0-6.0, and 0.0-6.3, respectively. The pooled adjusted RR (95 % CI), only reported for infections requiring hospitalization, was 1.2 (0.6-2.2) for abatacept versus csDMARDs and 0.9 (0.6-1.3) versus other b/tsDMARDs. CONCLUSIONS: Data from this international, observational study showed similar hospitalized infection risk for abatacept versus csDMARDs or other b/tsDMARDs. IRs for opportunistic infections, including tuberculosis, were low. These data are consistent with the known safety profile of abatacept.

Abatacept and non-melanoma skin cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comprehensive evaluation of randomised controlled trials and observational studies.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) risk associated with abatacept treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This evaluation included 16 abatacept RA clinical trials and 6 observational studies. NMSC incidence rates (IRs)/1000 patient-years (p-y) of exposure were compared between patients treated with abatacept versus placebo, conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and other biological/targeted synthetic (b/ts)DMARDs. For observational studies, a random-effects model was used to pool rate ratios (RRs). RESULTS: ~49 000 patients receiving abatacept were analysed from clinical trials (~7000) and observational studies (~42 000). In randomised trials (n=4138; median abatacept exposure, 12 (range 2-30) months), NMSC IRs (95% CIs) were not significantly different for abatacept (6.0 (3.3 to 10.0)) and placebo (4.0 (1.3 to 9.3)) and remained stable throughout the long-term, open-label period (median cumulative exposure, 28 (range 2-130 months); 21 335 p-y of exposure (7044 patients over 3 years)). For registry databases, NMSC IRs/1000 p-y were 5-12 (abatacept), 1.6-10 (csDMARDs) and 3-8 (other b/tsDMARDs). Claims database IRs were 19-22 (abatacept), 15-18 (csDMARDs) and 14-17 (other b/tsDMARDs). Pooled RRs (95% CIs) from observational studies for NMSC in patients receiving abatacept were 1.84 (1.00 to 3.37) vs csDMARDs and 1.11 (0.98 to 1.26) vs other b/tsDMARDs. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the warnings and precautions of the abatacept label, this analysis suggests a potential increase in NMSC risk with abatacept use compared with csDMARDs. No significant increase was observed compared with b/tsDMARDs, but the lower limit of the 95% CI was close to unity.

Treatment Adherence and Adherence Patterns of Tofacitinib and Self-Injectable TNFi Use in People with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess tofacitinib and self-injectable tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) adherence using the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) and characterize association with adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Eligible patients were enrolled from the Forward Databank within 6 months of initiating tofacitinib or injectable TNFi or from participating clinics where these were first prescribed. MEMS caps and patient diaries were used to compile dosing over 9 months. Demographics and disease characteristics were collected every 6 months, and the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire only at baseline. Adherence along with its components, initiation, implementation, and persistence, were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 112 consented to participate, 82 (73%) remained in the final analysis with recruitment from clinics 47 (57%) and Forward 35 (43%). Sixty-two (76%) initiated tofacitinib with 87% taking it quaque die and twenty (24%) TNFi. At 9 months, 77% of tofacitinib were persistent versus 70% for TNFi (P = 0.65), and implementation was similar (0.84 vs. 0.82; P = 0.57). In multivariable models, increased baseline patient global assessment was consistently associated with discontinuation (hazard ratio 1.31 [1.07-1.61]). There was increased adherence to methotrexate (MTX) when taking tofacitinib that led to higher combined adherence for tofacitinib than TNFi (0.81 vs. 0.69; P = 0.03), but no significant differences remained in multivariable models. In sensitivity analysis, consistent morning intake for tofacitinib and evening intake for MTX was associated with improved adherence. CONCLUSION: We found no statistical differences in adherence between patients with RA initiating tofacitinib and self-injectable TNFi, although 15% to 30% were nonadherent. Concomitant MTX, patient global assessment, and a consistent time of day intake were associated with adherence.

Urban and Rural Patterns of Health Care Utilization Among People With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis in a Large US Patient Registry.

OBJECTIVE: Rural residence has been associated with health disparities in rheumatic diseases and other chronic conditions in the United States. This study aimed to determine if a relationship exists between geographic residence and health care utilization outcomes for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA) in a US-wide rheumatic disease registry. METHODS: Participants were in FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, a US-wide rheumatic disease longitudinal cohort completing questionnaires between 1999 and 2019. Health care utilization variables (ie, medical visits and diagnostic tests) from six-month questionnaires were analyzed by geographic categories (small rural/isolated, large rural, and urban). Double selection LASSO with Poisson regression was used to assess the best model when examining the association between health care utilization variables and geographic residence. RESULTS: Among 37,802 participants with RA, urban residents were more likely than small rural residents to use in-person health care by most measures including physician visits and diagnostic tests. Urban residents reported more rheumatologist visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.18-1.27) but fewer primary care visits (IRR 0.90; 95% CI 0.85-0.94). Among 8,248 participants with OA, urban residents were also more likely than rural residents to report health care utilization by most measures. CONCLUSION: Individuals residing in urban areas were more likely than those in rural areas to report in-person health care utilization. Specifically, urban residents with RA were more likely to report rheumatologist visits, but less likely to report primary care visits. Less disparity existed in OA health care utilization, although an urban-rural disparity still existed by most measures.

Major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality with opioids versus NSAIDs initiation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Assess major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) risk with opioids compared with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) METHODS: We conducted a new-user active comparator cohort study among patients with RA within FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, with ≥1 year participation between 1998 and 2021. Each opioid initiator was matched to two NSAID initiators by propensity scores (PSs). Patients were followed until the occurrence of the composite endpoint of MACE (myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, cardiovascular disease (CVD) death, venous thromboembolism (VTE)) and all-cause mortality. The risk of outcomes was estimated using Cox proportional hazards with adjustment for PS weights and imbalanced covariables. RESULTS: Among 6866 opioid initiators and 13 689 NSAID initiators, 212 vs 253 MACE (20.6/1000 person-years (PY) vs 18.9/1000 PY) and 144 vs 150 deaths (13.5/1000 PY vs 10.8/1000 PY) occurred, respectively. The risk of MACE with opioids was similar to NSAIDs (HR=1.02, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.22), whereas all-cause mortality with opioids was 33% higher than NSAIDs (HR=1.33, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.67) in PS-weighted models. Among the individual outcomes of MACE, VTE risk tended to be higher in opioid initiators than NSAID initiators (HR=1.41, 95% CI 0.84 to 2.35). Strong opioids had a higher risk for all-cause mortality and VTE than weak opioids compared with NSAIDs suggesting a dose-dependent association. CONCLUSION: Opioids had similar MACE risk compared with NSAIDs in patients with RA with increased all-cause mortality and likely VTE, which suggests that opioids are not safer than NSAIDs, as clinicians have perceived.

Obesity, Adipokines, and Chronic and Persistent Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

We aimed to determine whether adipokines are associated with pain and polysymptomatic distress in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over time in a large patient registry. The cohort study was conducted in a subset of Forward; a patient-based multi-disease, multipurpose rheumatic disease registry with patients enrolled from community-based rheumatology practices across the U.S. Adipokines (adiponectin, leptin, and fibroblast growth factor[FGF]-21) were measured on stored serum as part of a multi-analyte panel. Body mass index (BMI), pain, polysymptomatic distress, and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were reported on biannual questionnaires. Linear regression was used to evaluate independent associations between BMI, adipokines, and PROs. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated independent associations between adipokines and clinically meaningful changes in pain over time (change in numerical rating>1.1 [range 0-10], sustained over 1 year). Among 645 patients included in these analyses, there were significant differences in RA characteristics, comorbidity, PROs, and adipokines across obesity categories. Of note, severely obese patients were more likely to experience greater pain, polysymptomatic distress, and fatigue. Patients with higher FGF-21 levels had higher pain and polysymptomatic stress at baseline, were more likely to use opioids, and were more likely to have sustained worsening pain over time [HR (per 1 SD) (95% CI): 1.22 (1.02,1.46) P = .03] independent of BMI. Obesity and elevated levels of FGF-21 are associated with pain and polysymptomatic distress in RA. Elevated FGF-21 levels may help identify those at risk of worsening pain trajectories over time, independent of BMI. PERSPECTIVE: This study characterizes the relationship between severe obesity and pain and polysymptomatic distress in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and demonstrates that the adipocytokine fibroblast growth factor-21 is independently associated with pain and predicts a worsening trajectory over time. Further mechanistic studies are needed.

Physical Activity Habits Among Older Adults Living With Rheumatic Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To describe levels of physical activity (PA) in older adults with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) and study the association between PA level and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Using data from FORWARD, a cross-sectional analysis was performed among adults aged 65 years and older with RMDs to assess the levels of PA. PA was categorized as high (vigorously active for at least 30 minutes, 3 times per week), moderate (moderately active for at least 3 times per week) or low (seldom active). We assessed the self-reported levels of PA among patients with different types of RMDs and assessed the association between levels of PA and PROs, including the 29-item Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) assessment. RESULTS: Among the 3343 eligible participants, rheumatoid arthritis (68%) was the most common RMD. High PA was reported by 457 (13.6%) participants, and 1820 (54.4%) reported moderate activity. Overall, participants reported a median of 7 (IQR 0-15) days of moderate to vigorous level of PA for ≥ 30 min per month. Obese participants were significantly more likely to report low levels of activity (44% of obese compared to 25% of nonobese individuals). Participants with low PA levels had higher (worse) pain scores, higher (worse) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores, higher depression rates, and worse PROMIS-29 scores related to pain, sleep and fatigue. CONCLUSION: Among patients with RMDs, levels of high PA were relatively low among older patients. These observations, though descriptive, support a relationship between physical inactivity and obesity, depression, poor sleep, and fatigue in patients with RMDs.

Reduction of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality Versus Risk of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus With Statin Use in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of statin use on the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), all-cause mortality, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We identified a cohort of patients with RA between 1989 and 2018, within the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. We employed a prevalent new-user cohort design by which patients initiating statins were each matched to 2 concurrent nonusers by the time-conditional propensity score (TCPS). Patients were followed until the occurrence of the composite end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalized heart failure or CVD mortality, all-cause mortality, and incident type 2 DM. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of each outcome associated with as-treated statin use, with adjustment for TCPS deciles and imbalanced covariables. RESULTS: Among 1,768 statin initiators and 3,528 nonusers, 63 versus 340 CVD (3.0 per 100 person-years versus 2.7 per 100 person-years) and 62 versus 525 deaths (2.8 per 100 person-years versus 4.1 per 100 person-years) occurred. Incident type 2 DM was noted in 128 of 3,608 statin initiators (3.0 per 100 person-years) and 518 of 7,208 nonusers (2.0 per 100 person-years). Statin initiation was associated with 32% (HR 0.68 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.51-0.90]) reduction in CVD, 54% (HR 0.46 [95% CI 0.35-0.60]) reduction in all-cause mortality, and 33% increase in type 2 DM (HR 1.33 [95% CI 1.09-1.63]). The number needed to treat/number needed to harm to prevent a CVD or all-cause mortality or to cause type 2 DM in 1 year was 102, 42, and 127, respectively. CONCLUSION: Statins are associated with important reductions in CVD and mortality that outweigh the modest increase in type 2 DM risk in RA patients.

Sleep Disorders Among Individuals With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Self-reported sleep problems are common in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with potential negative health implications, yet relatively little research has focused on sleep in RA. We examined the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) risk, restless legs syndrome (RLS) symptoms, and short sleep (SS) in a large RA cohort (n = 4,200) and factors associated with each. METHODS: Data are from FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases. Validated screening measures assessed OSA risk and RLS symptoms. SS was based on self-reported average sleep time (<6 hours). The Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index I measured self-reported sleep quality. Multivariable logistic regression models identified independent predictors of sleep disorders and sleep quality and the independent association of OSA risk, RLS symptoms, and SS with self-reported poor sleep quality. RESULTS: Twenty-one percent (n = 899) had OSA diagnosis or risk, 30% (n = 1,272) had RLS symptoms or diagnosis, and 43% (n = 1,737) reported SS, and RA disease activity was associated with each sleep disorder. Abatacept use was associated with lower odds of RLS and SS. Use of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or abatacept was less frequent in the SS group. No medications were associated with OSA in multivariable analyses. Both RLS and SS was associated with worse perceived sleep quality. DISCUSSION: Almost two-thirds met criteria for at least one sleep disorder. RA disease activity and pain were significantly associated with each sleep condition. Additional research is needed to identify the causal pathway between sleep disorders and RA disease activity and pain and the long-term consequences of sleep disorders in RA.

Health care utilization and costs associated with functional status in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) has been validated and widely used in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) clinical trials for the assessment of patient functional status. Significant improvements in the HAQ-DI have been reported in response to therapeutic interventions; however, few US studies have evaluated the economic impact of functional disability in patients with PsA. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of functional status with health care resource utilization (HCRU) and total health care costs in US patients diagnosed with PsA. METHODS: This retrospective study included adult patients with PsA enrolled in FORWARD between July 2009 and June 2019 who completed 1 or more HAQ-DI questionnaires between January 2010 and December 2019. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes were collected from the most recent questionnaire. HCRU and total health care costs (2019 US dollars) for all hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, outpatient visits, diagnostic tests, and procedures were assessed for the 6 months prior to survey completion. Negative binomial regression models (HCRU outcomes) and generalized linear models with γ distribution and log-link function (cost outcomes) were used to assess the relationship between HAQ-DI and HCRU and cost outcomes, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 828 patients with PsA who completed HAQ-DI questionnaires were included. The mean (SD) age was 58.5 (13.5) years, 72.3% were female, and 92.3% were White. The mean (SD) disease duration was 17.5 (12.4) years, and the mean (SD) HAQ-DI score at the time of the patients' most recent questionnaire was 0.9 (0.7). More severe functional disability, measured by higher HAQ-DI score, was significantly associated with increased risk (incident rate ratio [95% CI]) of hospitalizations (1.68 [1.11-2.55]), ED visits (2.09 [1.47-2.96]), outpatient visits (1.14 [1.05-1.24]), and diagnostic tests (1.42 [1.16-1.74]). There was also a significant positive association between greater HAQ-DI score and increased total annualized health care costs (incremental amount [95% CI], 1.13 [1.03-1.23]) and medical costs (1.38 [1.13-1.69]), but there was no significant association found with pharmacy costs. Total adjusted average patient medical costs increased with increasing HAQ-DI score. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with PsA enrolled in FORWARD, more functional disability-as measured by higher HAQ-DI scores-was associated with greater HCRU and increased total health care costs. These results suggest that improving functional status in patients with PsA may reduce economic burden for health care payers and systems. DISCLOSURES: Dr Ogdie has received consulting fees from Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, CorEvitas (formerly Corrona), Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB and has received grant support from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Rheumatology Research Foundation, National Psoriasis Foundation, Pfizer (University of Pennsylvania), Amgen (FORWARD), and Novartis (FORWARD). Dr Hwang has received consulting fees from Novartis and UCB and has received grant support (5KL2TR003168-03) from the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Center of Clinical and Translational Sciences KL2 program. Drs Veeranki and Shafrin were employees of PRECISIONheor at the time of this analysis. Ms Portelli and Mr Sison are employees of PRECISIONheor. Ms Pedro has nothing to disclose. Dr Hass is an employee of H. E. Outcomes, providing consulting services to Novartis. Dr Hur was an employee of Novartis at the time of this analysis. Dr Kim was a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Texas at Austin and Baylor Scott and White Health, providing services to Novartis at the time of this analysis. Dr Yi is an employee of Novartis. Dr Michaud received grant funding from the Rheumatology Research Foundation at the time of this analysis. This study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ.

Association of health care utilization and costs with patient-reported outcomes in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

BACKGROUND: Interventions for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) have improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical studies. However, limited data exist associating these improvements with health care resource utilization (HCRU) or cost savings. Few studies have evaluated the economic impact of patient-reported physical status and related disease burden in patients with AS in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of PRO measures with HCRU and health care costs in patients with AS from a national US registry. METHODS: This cohort study included adults with a diagnosis of AS enrolled in the FORWARD registry from July 2009 to June 2019 who completed at least 1 questionnaire from January 2010 to December 2019 and completed the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (0-3) and/or Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (0-10). Patient-reported data for demographics, clinical characteristics, and PROs were collected through questionnaires administered biannually and reported from the most recent questionnaire. Patient-reported HCRU and total health care costs (2019 US dollars) for hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, outpatient visits, diagnostic tests, and procedures were captured during the 6 months prior to the most recent survey completion. The relationship between HAQ-DI or BASDAI and HCRU outcomes was assessed using negative binomial regression models, and the relationship between HAQ-DI or BASDAI and the cost outcomes was evaluated using generalized linear models with γ distribution and log-link function. RESULTS: Overall, 334 patients with AS who completed the HAQ-DI (n = 253) or BASDAI (n = 81) were included. The mean (SD) HAQ-DI and BASDAI scores at the time of patients' most recent surveys were 0.9 (0.7) and 3.7 (2.3), respectively. HAQ-DI score was positively associated with number of hospitalizations, ED visits, outpatient visits, and diagnostic tests, whereas BASDAI was not associated with HCRU outcomes. Overall annualized mean (SD) total health care, medical, and pharmacy costs for patients with AS were $44,783 ($40,595); $6,521 ($12,733); and $38,263 ($40,595), respectively. Annualized total health care, medical, and pharmacy costs adjusted for confounders increased by 35%, 76%, and 26%, respectively, for each 1.0-unit increase in HAQ-DI score (coefficient [95% CI]: 1.35 [1.15-1.58], 1.76 [1.22-2.55]; both P < 0.01 and 1.26 [1.04-1.52]; P < 0.05, respectively); BASDAI score was not significantly associated with cost outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Higher HAQ-DI scores were associated with higher HCRU and total health care costs among patients with AS in FORWARD, but BASDAI scores were not. These findings indicate that greater functional impairment may impose an increased economic burden compared with other patient-reported measures of AS. DISCLOSURES: A. Ogdie has received consulting fees from Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, CorEvitas (formerly Corrona), Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB and has received grant support from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Rheumatology Research Foundation, National Psoriasis Foundation, Pfizer (University of Pennsylvania), Amgen (FORWARD), and Novartis (FORWARD). M. Hwang has received consulting fees from Novartis and UCB and has received grant support (5KL2TR003168-03) from the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Center of Clinical and Translational Sciences KL2 program. P. Veeranki and J. Shafrin were employees of PRECISION-heor at the time of this analysis. A. Portelli and S. Sison are employees of PRECISION-heor. S. Pedro does not have anything to disclose. N. Kim was a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Texas at Austin and Baylor Scott and White Health, providing services to Novartis at the time of this study. E. Yi is an employee of Novartis. K. Michaud received grant funding from the Rheumatology Research Foundation at the time of this analysis. This study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ.

Smartphone-based behavioral monitoring and patient-reported outcomes in adults with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) are associated with depression, fatigue, and disturbed sleep - symptoms that often impact behavior and activity. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are a way of collecting information on the patient symptom experience directly from the individual. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare user smartphone sensor and activity data in adults with RMDs and assess associations with PROs. METHODS: We invited adults with RMDs enrolled in the FORWARD Databank to participate by installing a custom app on their smartphone and answering PROs (pain, global, HAQ-II) questions daily and weekly over 3 years. Passive data collected included mobility distance, unique calls and text messages, call durations, and number of missed calls. Confounders included sociodemographic, clinical, passive phone behavior, and seasonal factors. Kappa statistics between PRO and flares were computed to measure agreement. The agreement between daily and weekly VAS pain was estimated using the intraclass (ICC) correlation of a two-way random effect model. The relationship between the weekly PRO outcomes and the passive phone data was analyzed with a linear mixed-effect model (LMM), including a random intercept for participant and slope for time in the study with an unstructured covariate structure. RESULTS: Of the 446 participants, the mean (SD) age was 54 (12) years, most (65.5%) had rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the vast majority (91%) were female, and the US Northeast has the least representation (12%). Longer reaction times, interaction diversity, and higher mobility were associated with worse PROs while longer text messages were associated with better PROs. Participants in this study showed good levels of adherence which holds promise for future interventions using passive behavior measures in self-management and clinical follow-up. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to examine passive smartphone behavior with PROs in RMDs and we found significant associations between these behaviors and important health outcomes of pain and function. As smartphone usage continues to change, future studies should validate and expand on our findings with a goal of finding changes in patient symptoms passively through mobile device monitoring.

Risk factors for venous thromboembolism and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: do they differ in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an increasing concern in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with little known about risk factors. We aimed to compare risk factors for unprovoked VTE and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in patients with RA and to assess subsequent ASCVD risk after an unprovoked VTE. METHODS: People with RA participating in a US-wide longitudinal observational registry from 1998 to 2018 were assessed for incident unprovoked VTE (deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary emboli not associated with cancer, recent surgery, hospitalisation, fracture and pregnancy) and ASCVD (myocardial infarction and stroke) validated from hospital/death records. Risk factors for VTE and ASCVD and the risk of ASCVD after an unprovoked VTE were determined using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: During median (IQR) 4 (1.5-7) years of follow-up in 31 366 patients with RA, 539 unprovoked VTE and 1648 ASCVD events were identified. The adjusted models showed increased VTE and ASCVD risk with older age, male sex, comorbidities, prior fracture, worse disability, higher disease activity and glucocorticoids. Traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors were common in both ASCVD and VTE but only increased ASCVD risk with obesity as the exception (VTE HR (95% CI), 1.46 (1.13-1.87)) and ASCVD, 0.58 (0.50-0.68)). ASCVD risk doubled after an unprovoked VTE (HR (95% CI), 2.05 (1.43-2.95)). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that unprovoked VTE is mediated by inflammation of RA and may be considered a spectrum of pan-cardiovascular syndrome.

Changes in Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Treatment for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in the US During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Three-Month Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: To understand medication, lifestyle, and clinical care changes of persons with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during the first months (March 2020 through May 2020) of the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. METHODS: Data were collected from adults with RA participating in FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases observational registry, who answered COVID-19 web-based surveys in May 2020 and previously provided baseline characteristics and medication use prior to the US COVID-19 pandemic. We compared medication changes by disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) exposure in logistic models that were adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities including pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases, education level, health insurance status, RA disease activity, fatigue, and polysymptomatic distress. RESULTS: Of 734 respondents, 221 (30%) reported medication changes. Among respondents who experienced a medication change, i.e., "medication changers/changers," glucocorticoids (GCs) were more commonly used compared to respondents who did not experience a medication change ("non-changers") (33% versus 18%). Non-hydroxychloroquine conventional DMARDs were less commonly used in changers compared to non-changers pre-COVID-19 (49% versus 62%), and changers reported more economic hardship during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to non-changers (23% versus 15%). While JAK inhibitor use was associated with the likelihood of a medication change, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.9 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.0, 3.4), only pre-COVID GC use remained a strong predictor for medication change in multivariable models (OR 3.0 [95% CI 1.9, 4.9]). Change in care was observed to have a significant association with pulmonary disease (OR 2.9 [95% CI 1.3, 6.5]), worse RA disease activity (OR 1.1 [95% CI 1.0, 1.1]), and GC use (OR 1.6 [95% CI 1.0, 2.5]). While the incidence of medication changes was the same before and after the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidance for the management of rheumatic disease in adult patients during the COVID-19 pandemic were first published in April 2020, self-imposed changes in medication were approximately twice as likely before publication of the guidelines, and physician-guided changes were more likely after publication. CONCLUSION: Persons with RA in the US made substantial medication changes during the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic, and changes among persons with RA after publication of the ACR guidance in April 2020 were made with increased physician guidance.

The Impact of Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE).

BACKGROUND: Risk of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may be elevated in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but little research has studied the impact of these conditions on SLE outcomes. We examined prevalence, incidence, and impact of self-reported asthma and COPD in two US-based SLE cohorts (FORWARD and Lupus Outcomes Study [LOS]). METHODS: Prevalence of asthma and COPD were defined as presence of conditions at individuals' first interviews; incidence was defined as new reports over the next 3 years. Cross-sectional associations of asthma/COPD with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and longitudinal analyses associations with asthma/COPD at entry with PROs 3 years later were examined. RESULTS: In FORWARD, 19.8% and 8.3% participants reported asthma and COPD, respectively, at entry. In LOS, 36.0% reported the presence of either (US population comparisons: asthma, 9.7%; COPD, 6.1%). Cross-sectionally, asthma/COPD was associated with worse PROs, including disease activity. In FORWARD, individuals with asthma experienced greater worsening of fatigue, pain, and global health ratings longitudinally; individuals with COPD experienced greater increases in self-reported SLE activity. However, no such patterns were noted in the LOS. CONCLUSION: Asthma and COPD appeared to be more common in SLE than in the general US population and were associated with worse status on PROs cross-sectionally. Asthma was linked to decrements in PROs longitudinally.

Obesity and the Risk of Incident Chronic Opioid Use in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to evaluate whether the rate of incident chronic opioid use is higher in obese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Participants with RA in the FORWARD databank were asked about their use of weak and strong opioid medications on semiannual surveys. Incident chronic opioid use was defined as new reported use extending over 2 contiguous surveys (~7-12 months). Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate associations between body mass index (BMI) at enrollment and incident chronic opioid use (overall use and strong opioid use). Models adjusted for demographics, smoking, disease duration, RA treatments, household income, and education level. The predicted 5-year cumulative incidence was calculated from Cox models. RESULTS: Among 19,794 participants, 2,802 experienced an incident episode of chronic opioid use over 93,254 person-years of follow-up. Higher BMI was associated with higher risk of chronic opioid use. Severe obesity (BMI >35 kg/m2 ) was associated with a higher risk of overall use (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj ] 1.74 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.72-2.04], P < 0.0001) and strong opioid use (HRadj 2.11 [95% CI 1.64-2.71], P < 0.001) compared to normal BMI. This association was partially explained by greater comorbidity, pain, and disability in obese groups. The attributable risk for obesity was 15% of overall opioid use and 24% of strong opioid use. CONCLUSION: Obesity is associated with a substantially higher risk of incident chronic opioid use. Approximately 1 in 4 cases of incident use of strong opioids may be attributable to obesity, suggesting a major public health impact. Interventions to prevent or reduce obesity could have an important impact on the use of opioids.

The Risk of Cardiovascular Events Associated With Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the comparative effects of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) and tofacitinib against conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) on incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: RA patients with ≥ 1 year of participation in the FORWARD study, from 1998 through 2017, were assessed for incident composite CVD events (myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and CVD-related death validated from hospital/death records). DMARD were categorized into 7 mutually exclusive groups: (1) csDMARD-referent; (2) tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor (TNFi); (3) abatacept (ABA); (4) rituximab; (5) tocilizumab; (6) anakinra; and (7) tofacitinib. Glucocorticoids (GC) were assessed using a weighted cumulative exposure model, which combines information about duration, intensity, and timing of exposure into a summary measure by using the weighted sum of past oral doses (prednisolone equivalent). Cox proportional hazard models were used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: During median (IQR) 4.0 (1.7-8.0) years of follow-up, 1801 CVD events were identified in 18,754 RA patients. The adjusted model showed CVD risk reduction with TNFi (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.93) and ABA (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.83) compared to csDMARD. While higher GC exposure as weighted cumulative exposure was associated with increased CVD risk (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.11-1.19), methotrexate (MTX) use was associated with CVD risk reduction [use vs nonuse HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.90, and high dose (> 15 mg/week) vs low dose (≤ 15 mg/week) HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99]. CONCLUSION: ABA and TNFi were associated with decreased risk of CVD compared to csDMARD. Minimizing GC use and optimizing MTX dose may improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with RA.