Ritlecitinib, a JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, stabilizes active lesions and repigments stable lesions in vitiligo.

The efficacy of ritlecitinib, an oral JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, on active and stable lesions was evaluated in patients with active non-segmental vitiligo in a phase 2b trial (NCT03715829). Patients were randomized to placebo or daily ritlecitinib 50 mg (with or without 4-week 100-mg or 200-mg loading dose), 30 mg, or 10 mg for 24 weeks. Active lesions showed greater baseline expression of inflammatory/immune markers IFNG and CCL5, levels of CD103, and T-cell infiltrates than stable lesions. Patients with more active than stable vitiligo lesions showed higher baseline serum levels of CXCL9 and PD-L1, while patients with more stable than active lesions showed higher baseline serum levels of HO-1. At Week 24, ritlecitinib 50 mg significantly stabilized mean percent change from baseline in depigmentation extent in both active lesions and stable lesions vs. placebo-response, with stable lesions showing greater repigmentation. After 24 weeks of treatment, ritlecitinib 50 mg increased expression of melanocyte markers in stable lesions, while Th1/Th2-related and co-stimulatory molecules decreased significantly in both stable and active lesions. Serum from patients with more active than stable lesions showed decreased levels of ICOS and NK cell activation markers. These data, confirmed at transcription/protein levels, indicate that stable lesion repigmentation occurs early with ritlecitinib, while active lesions require stabilization of inflammation first. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03715829.

A Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-dose escalation study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of PF-06835375, a C-X-C chemokine receptor type 5 directed antibody, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PF­06835375, a potent selective afucosyl immunoglobulin G1 antibody targeting C-X-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CXCR5) that potentially depletes B cells, follicular T helper (Tfh) cells, and circulating Tfh-like (cTfh) cells, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This first-in-human, multicenter, double-blind, sponsor-open, placebo-controlled Phase 1 study recruited patients aged 18-70 years with SLE or RA. In Part A, patients received single doses of intravenous PF-06835375 (dose range: 0.03-6 mg) or placebo in six sequential single ascending dose (SAD) cohorts. In Part B, patients received repeat doses of subcutaneous PF-06835375 (dose range: 0.3-10 mg) or placebo on Days 1 and 29 in five multiple ascending dose (MAD) cohorts. Tetanus/Diphtheria (Td) and Meningococcal B (MenB/Trumenba™) vaccines were administered at Day 4 (Td and MenB) and Week 8 (MenB only) to assess PF-06835375 functional effects. Endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), pharmacokinetic parameters, pharmacodynamic effects on B and cTfh cells, and biomarker counts, vaccine response, and exploratory differential gene expression analysis. Safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic endpoints are summarized descriptively. The change from baseline of B and Tfh cell-specific genes over time was calculated using a prespecified mixed-effects model, with a false discovery rate < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In total, 73 patients were treated (SAD cohorts: SLE, n = 17; RA, n = 14; MAD cohorts: SLE, n = 22; RA, n = 20). Mean age was 53.3 years. Sixty-two (84.9%) patients experienced TEAEs (placebo n = 17; PF-06835375 n = 45); most were mild or moderate. Three (9.7%) patients experienced serious adverse events. Mean t1/2 ranged from 3.4-121.4 h (SAD cohorts) and 162.0-234.0 h (MAD cohorts, Day 29). B and cTfh cell counts generally showed dose-dependent reductions across cohorts (range of mean maximum depletion: 67.3-99.3%/62.4-98.7% [SAD] and 91.1-99.6%/89.5-98.1% [MAD], respectively). B cell-related genes and pathways were significantly downregulated in patients treated with PF-06835375. CONCLUSIONS: These data support further development of PF-06835375 to assess the clinical potential for B and Tfh cell depletion as a treatment for autoimmune diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03334851.

Pathogenesis of Alopecia Areata and Vitiligo: Commonalities and Differences.

Both alopecia areata (AA) and vitiligo are distinct, heterogenous, and complex disease entities, characterized by nonscarring scalp terminal hair loss and skin pigment loss, respectively. In AA, inflammatory cell infiltrates are in the deep reticular dermis close to the hair bulb (swarm of bees), whereas in vitiligo the inflammatory infiltrates are in the epidermis and papillary dermis. Immune privilege collapse has been extensively investigated in AA pathogenesis, including the suppression of immunomodulatory factors (e.g., transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß), programmed death-ligand 1 (PDL1), interleukin-10 (IL-10), α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH), and macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF)) and enhanced expression of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) throughout hair follicles. However, immune privilege collapse in vitiligo remains less explored. Both AA and vitiligo are autoimmune diseases that share commonalities in pathogenesis, including the involvement of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (and interferon-α (IFN- α) signaling pathways) and cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes (and activated IFN-γ signaling pathways). Blood chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 9 (CXCL9) and CXCL10 are elevated in both diseases. Common factors that contribute to AA and vitiligo include oxidative stress, autophagy, type 2 cytokines, and the Wnt/ß-catenin pathway (e.g., dickkopf 1 (DKK1)). Here, we summarize the commonalities and differences between AA and vitiligo, focusing on their pathogenesis.

Master protocols and other innovative trial designs in inflammation and immunology to expedite clinical drug development.

Master protocol designs, such as umbrella and basket studies, allow multiple compounds or multiple target populations to be evaluated simultaneously within a single protocol, and have been widely adopted in oncology clinical trials. These novel designs can also be applied in other therapeutic areas, where they could have several benefits over conducting traditional randomized controlled trials. Here, we detail Pfizer's recent implementations of master protocol designs in inflammation and immunology clinical studies, focusing on the opportunities for cost and resource savings and how these designs can expedite the time required to bring new treatments to patients in need.

Demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns among keloid patients: United States Electronic Health Records (EHR) Database Study.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited epidemiologic evidence on keloids using real-world data, especially in the United States (US) across race and ethnicity. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Cerner Real-World Data, between 2015 and 2021, to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of US adults with keloids. Keloids were identified using a combination of ICD-10 and (Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms [SNOMED] codes). Demographics (including race and ethnicity), clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and healthcare utilization were compared across keloid and non-keloid populations. RESULTS: Among 5,457 keloid patients identified in the study, the majority were female (61.8%) with a mean age of 34.2 years and of non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Asian descent (P < 0.001). Relative to non-keloid cohorts, patients with keloids had significantly higher rates of integumentary, cardiorespiratory, general, auditory, and ocular surgeries and burns (all P < 0.05). Patients with keloids were also more likely to have comorbidities like obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes (P < 0.05) when compared to those with no keloids. A large proportion of keloids were untreated; among those treated, the most common keloid treatments were medication therapy (51.5%) and surgical excision (10.6%). Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic keloid patients were significantly more likely to receive medication therapy and surgical excision (P < 0.001) compared to keloid patients of other races or ethnicities. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided real-world insights into the keloid population in the US. Our findings emphasize the high burden of keloids and its substantial impact on ethnic minorities. Given high keloid recurrence rates and limited standardized treatments for keloids, further research into keloids is crucial to the development of keloid-specific therapeutic options.

Brepocitinib, Zimlovisertib, and Ropsacitinib in Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating, inflammatory skin disease with limited treatment options and partially understood pathophysiology. Using an umbrella trial design, three kinase inhibitor immunomodulators with different mechanisms of action were evaluated. METHODS: This phase 2a, double-blind, parallel-group trial enrolled adults with moderate to severe HS who were then randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to once-daily brepocitinib 45 mg (a JAK1/TYK2 inhibitor), zimlovisertib 400 mg (an IRAK4 inhibitor), ropsacitinib 400 mg (a TYK2 inhibitor), or matching placebo for 16 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage of participants achieving HS clinical response (HiSCR) at week 16. Safety, including treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), was monitored throughout. RESULTS: Totals of 52, 47, 47, and 48 participants were assigned to brepocitinib, zimlovisertib, ropsacitinib, and placebo, respectively. At week 16, 28% were lost to follow-up and assumed to be nonresponders; HiSCR occurred in 33.3% (16/48) of participants receiving placebo and in 51.9% (27/52), 34.0% (16/47), and 37.0% (17/46) of those receiving brepocitinib, zimlovisertib, and ropsacitinib (difference in percentage points vs. placebo [90% confidence interval], 18.7 [2.7 to 34.6], 0.7 [−15.2 to 16.7], and 3.5 [−12.6 to 19.6]), respectively. TEAEs occurred more frequently with active treatment (brepocitinib, 30 [57.7%]; zimlovisertib, 26 [55.3%]; ropsacitinib, 29 [61.7%]; placebo, 23 [47.9%]). Most TEAEs (infections, skin disorders, and gastrointestinal symptoms) were mild; there were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with moderate to severe HS treated with brepocitinib experienced greater clinical response, whereas those on zimlovisertib and ropsacitinib did not, compared with placebo. These results favor the JAK/STAT pathway as an immunologic target in HS and did not confirm a role for selective IRAK4 or TYK2 inhibition. These results should be confirmed in larger studies with longer follow-up. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov registration number, NCT04092452.)

Natural History of Keloids: A Sociodemographic Analysis Using Structured and Unstructured Data.

INTRODUCTION: Keloids are lesions characterized by the growth of dense fibrous tissue extending beyond original wound boundaries. Research into the natural history of keloids and potential differences by sociodemographic factors in the USA is limited. This real-world, retrospective cohort study aimed to characterize a population of patients with keloids compared with matched dermatology and general cohorts. METHODS: Patients with ≥ 2 International Classification of Diseases codes for keloid ≥ 30 days apart and a confirmed keloid diagnosis from clinical notes enrolled in the OM1 Real-World Data Cloud between 1 January 2013 and 18 March 2022 were age- and sex-matched 1:1:1 to patients without keloids who visited dermatologists ("dermatology cohort") and those who did not ("general cohort"). Results are presented using descriptive statistics and analysis stratified by cohort, race, ethnicity, household income, and education. RESULTS: Overall, 24,453 patients with keloids were matched to 23,936 dermatology and 24,088 general patients. A numerically higher proportion of patients with keloids were Asian or Black. Among available data for patients with keloids, 67.7% had 1 keloid lesion, and 68.3% had keloids sized 0.5 to < 3 cm. Black patients tended to have larger keloids. Asian and Black patients more frequently had > 1 keloid than did white patients (30.6% vs. 32.5% vs. 20.5%). Among all patients with keloids who had available data, 56.4% had major keloid severity, with major severity more frequent in Black patients. Progression was not significantly associated with race, ethnicity, income, or education level; 29%, 25%, and 20% of the dermatology, keloid, and general cohorts were in the highest income bracket (≥ US$75,000). The proportion of patients with income below the federal poverty line (< US$22,000) and patterns of education level were similar across cohorts. CONCLUSION: A large population of patients in the USA with keloids was identified and characterized using structured/unstructured sources. A numerically higher proportion of patients with keloids were non-white; Black patients had larger, more severe keloids at diagnosis.

Improvements in immune/melanocyte biomarkers with JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor ritlecitinib in vitiligo.

BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is an autoimmune depigmenting disorder with no effective and safe treatments. Its pathogenesis is not fully elucidated. OBJECTIVE: This substudy of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial (NCT03715829) evaluated effects of ritlecitinib, an oral JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, on skin and blood biomarkers in participants with nonsegmental vitiligo (NSV). METHODS: Sixty-five adults with NSV participated in the substudy and received daily treatment for 24 weeks with placebo (n = 14) or ritlecitinib with or without a 4-week loading dose: 200 (loading dose)/50 mg (n = 13), 100/50 mg (n = 12), 50 mg (n = 11), 30 mg (n = 8), or 10 mg (n = 6). Skin (lesional and nonlesional) biopsy samples were obtained at baseline and at 4 and 24 weeks. Changes from baseline to weeks 4 and 24 in skin and blood molecular and cellular biomarkers were evaluated by RNA sequencing, quantitative real-time PCR, proteomic analysis, and flow cytometry. RESULTS: Ritlecitinib-treated groups showed downregulation of immune biomarkers and upregulation of melanocyte-related markers at weeks 4 and 24 compared to baseline and/or placebo. Significant reductions were seen in CD3+/CD8+ T-cell infiltrates, with significant increases in melanocyte markers (tyrosinase; Melan-A) in NSV lesions in the 50 mg ritlecitinib groups (both P < .05). There was significant, dose-dependent downregulation in T-cell activation, NK, cytotoxic, and regulatory markers in lesional skin (IL-2, IL2-RA, IL-15, CCR7, CD5, CRTAM, NCR1, XCL1, KIR3DL1, FASLG, KLRD; P < .05). TH1 and TH2 markers were also downregulated in lesional skin and blood in a dose-dependent manner (P < .05). Changes in immune biomarkers correlated with clinical response. CONCLUSIONS: Ritlecitinib significantly downregulated proinflammatory biomarkers and increased melanocyte products in skin and blood of participants with NSV, suggesting its potential in treatment. Ritlecitinib-mediated changes positively correlated with clinical response.

Efficacy and Safety of PF-07038124 in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis and Plaque Psoriasis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Atopic dermatitis (AD) and plaque psoriasis are inflammatory skin diseases with unmet need for effective topical treatments with few application site reactions. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of the topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor PF-07038124 in patients with AD and plaque psoriasis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 2a, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted from December 21, 2020, to August 18, 2021, at 34 sites across 4 countries. Eligible patients (aged 18-70 years) had mild to moderate AD (covering 5%-20% body surface area) or plaque psoriasis (covering 5%-15% body surface area). Data were analyzed until December 15, 2021. Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1) to PF-07038124, 0.01%, topical ointment or vehicle once daily for 6 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the percent change from baseline (CFB) in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) total score among patients with AD and in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score among patients with plaque psoriasis at week 6. Safety measures included treatment-emergent adverse events, including application site reactions. Results: Overall, 104 patients were randomized (mean [SD] age, 43.0 [15.4] years; 55 [52.9%] women; 4 [3.8%] Asian, 13 [12.5%] Black, and 87 [83.7%] White), including 70 with AD (41 women [58.6%]; mean [SD] ages, 41.4 [16.6] years in the PF-07038124 group and 36.1 [13.9] years in the vehicle group) and 34 with plaque psoriasis (20 men [58.8%]; mean [SD] ages, 51.8 [12.3] years in the PF-07038124 group and 51.2 [10.8] years in the vehicle group). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced. At week 6, the PF-07038124 groups showed significantly greater improvements compared with vehicle groups in EASI (least-squares mean CFB, -74.9% vs -35.5%; difference, -39.4% [90% CI, -58.8% to -20.1%]; P < .001) and PASI scores (CFB, -4.8 vs 0.1; difference, -4.9 [90% CI, -7.0 to -2.8]; P < .001). The number of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable between treatment groups in patients with AD (PF-07038124, 9 [25.0%]; vehicle, 9 [26.5%]) and plaque psoriasis (PF-07038124, 3 [17.6%]; vehicle, 6 [35.3%]). There were no application site reactions with PF-07038124 treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: Topical PF-07038124 was well tolerated and demonstrated superior efficacy compared with vehicle in patients with mild to moderate AD and plaque psoriasis. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04664153.

Baseline serum and stool microbiome biomarkers predict clinical efficacy and tissue molecular response after ritlecitinib induction therapy in ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ritlecitinib, an oral JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, was well- tolerated and efficacious in the phase 2b VIBRATO study in participants with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to identify baseline serum and microbiome markers that predict subsequent clinical efficacy and to develop noninvasive serum signatures as potential real-time noninvasive surrogates of clinical efficacy after ritlecitinib. METHODS: Tissue and peripheral blood proteomics, transcriptomics, and fecal metagenomics were performed on samples before and after 8-week oral ritlecitinib induction therapy (20 mg, 70 mg, 200 mg, or placebo once daily, N=39, 41, 33, and 18, respectively). Linear mixed models were used to identify baseline and longitudinal protein markers associated with efficacy. The combined predictivity of these proteins was evaluated using a logistic model with permuted efficacy data. Differential expression of fecal metagenomic was used to differentiate responders and nonresponders. RESULTS: Peripheral blood serum proteomics identified 4 baseline serum markers (LTA, CCL21, HLA-E, MEGF10) predictive of modified clinical remission (MR), endoscopic improvement (EI), histologic remission (HR), and integrative score of tissue molecular improvement. In responders, 37 serum proteins significantly changed at Week 8 compared with baseline (FDR<0.05); of these, changes in 4 (IL4R, TNFRSF4, SPINK4, and LAIR-1) predicted concurrent EI and HR responses. Fecal metagenomics analysis revealed baseline and treatment response signatures that correlated with EI, MR, and tissue molecular improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Blood and microbiome biomarkers stratify endoscopic, histologic, and tissue molecular response to ritlecitinib, which may help guide future precision medicine approaches to UC treatment.

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of PF-06817024 in Healthy Participants, Participants with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps, and Participants with Atopic Dermatitis: A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.

PF-06817024 is a high affinity, humanized antibody that binds interleukin-33, a proinflammatory type 2 cytokine, and thereby has the potential to inhibit downstream type 2 inflammation. This Phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 3 parts to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics of escalating single and limited repeat PF-06817024 doses in healthy participants (Part 1), a single dose of PF-06817024 in participants with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (Part 2), and repeat doses of PF-06817024 in participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (atoptic dermatitis; Part 3). PF-06817024 was generally well tolerated in all participant populations. Most participants experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event (healthy participants, 78.4% and 100%; participants with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, 90.9% and 88.9%; and participants with atoptic dermatitis, 60.0% and 62.5% in the PF-06817024 and placebo groups, respectively). No substantial deviations from dose proportionality were observed for single intravenous doses of 10-1000 mg, indicating linear PK in healthy participants. Mean terminal half-life ranged from 83 to 94 days after single intravenous administration in healthy participants and was similar to that observed after administration in the studied patient populations. Incidences of antidrug antibodies in the studied populations were 10.8%, 9.1%, and 5.0% for healthy participants, participants with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, and participants with atoptic dermatitis, respectively. In addition, dose-dependent increases were observed in total serum interleukin-33 levels of treated participants, indicating target engagement. Overall, the PK and safety profile of PF-06817024 supports further investigation of the drug as a potential treatment for allergic diseases.

Role of Innate Immunity in Allergic Contact Dermatitis: An Update.

Our understanding of allergic contact dermatitis mechanisms has progressed over the past decade. Innate immune cells that are involved in the pathogenesis of allergic contact dermatitis include Langerhans cells, dermal dendritic cells, macrophages, mast cells, innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), neutrophils, eosinophils, and basophils. ILCs can be subcategorized as group 1 (natural killer cells; ILC1) in association with Th1, group 2 (ILC2) in association with Th2, and group 3 (lymphoid tissue-inducer cells; ILC3) in association with Th17. Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) including toll-like receptors (TLRs) and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs) in innate immune cells recognize damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and cascade the signal to produce several cytokines and chemokines including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon (IFN)-α, IFN-γ, interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-4, IL-6, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17, IL-18, and IL-23. Here we discuss the recent findings showing the roles of the innate immune system in allergic contact dermatitis during the sensitization and elicitation phases.

Efficacy and Safety of the TYK2/JAK1 Inhibitor Brepocitinib for Active Psoriatic Arthritis: A Phase IIb Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Brepocitinib is a TYK2/JAK1 inhibitor in development for the treatment of several immunologic diseases. The efficacy and safety of oral brepocitinib were assessed in participants with moderately-to-severely active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for up to 52 weeks. METHODS: In this placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, phase IIb study, participants were randomized to receive 10 mg, 30 mg, or 60 mg of brepocitinib once daily or placebo, advancing to 30 mg or 60 mg of brepocitinib once daily at week 16. The primary endpoint was the response rate according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) in disease activity at week 16. Secondary endpoints included response rates according to the ACR50/ACR70 response criteria, 75% and 90% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75/PASI90) score, and minimal disease activity (MDA) at weeks 16 and 52. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Overall, 218 participants were randomized and treated. At week 16, the brepocitinib 30 mg and 60 mg once daily groups had significantly greater ACR20 response rates (66.7% [P = 0.0197] and 74.6% [P = 0.0006], respectively), versus the placebo group (43.3%), and significantly higher ACR50/ACR70, PASI75/PASI90, and MDA response rates. Response rates were maintained or improved through week 52. Adverse events were mostly mild/moderate; serious adverse events (15) in 12 participants (5.5%) included infections in 6 participants (2.8%) in the brepocitinib 30 mg and 60 mg once daily groups. No major adverse cardiovascular events or deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Treatment with brepocitinib at dosages of 30 mg and 60 mg once daily was superior to placebo at reducing signs and symptoms of PsA. Brepocitinib was generally well tolerated throughout the 52-week study, with a safety profile consistent with those found in other brepocitinib clinical trials.

Efficacy and safety of topical brepocitinib cream for mild-to-moderate chronic plaque psoriasis: a phase IIb randomized double-blind vehicle-controlled parallel-group study.

BACKGROUND: Plaque psoriasis (PsO) is an inflammatory skin disease driven, in part, by the activation of Janus kinase (JAK) signalling pathways. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of multiple doses of topical brepocitinib, a tyrosine kinase 2/JAK1 inhibitor, in participants with mild-to-moderate PsO. METHODS: This phase IIb multicentre randomized double-blind study was conducted in two stages. In stage 1, participants received one of eight treatments for 12 weeks: brepocitinib 0.1% once daily, 0.3% once or twice daily, 1.0% once or twice daily, 3.0% once daily, or vehicle once or twice daily. In stage 2, participants received brepocitinib 3.0% twice daily or vehicle twice daily. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score at week 12, analysed using analysis of covariance. The key secondary endpoint was the proportion of participants who achieved a Physician Global Assessment response [score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) and an improvement of ≥ 2 points from baseline] at week 12. Additional secondary endpoints included the difference vs. vehicle in change from baseline in PASI, using mixed-model repeated measures, and the change from baseline in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale at week 12. Safety was monitored. RESULTS: Overall, 344 participants were randomized. Topical brepocitinib did not result in statistically significant changes compared with respective vehicle controls in the primary or key secondary efficacy endpoints for any dose group. At week 12, least squares mean change from baseline in PASI score ranged from -1.4 to -2.4 for the brepocitinib once-daily groups vs. -1.6 for vehicle once daily, and from -2.5 to -3.0 for the brepocitinib twice-daily groups vs. -2.2 for vehicle twice daily. From week 8, change from baseline in PASI score separated from vehicle in all brepocitinib twice daily groups. Brepocitinib was well tolerated, with adverse events (AEs) occurring at similar rates across groups. One participant in the brepocitinib 1.0% once-daily group developed a treatment-related AE of herpes zoster in the neck area. CONCLUSIONS: Topical brepocitinib was well tolerated but did not result in statistically significant changes compared with vehicle when administered at the doses evaluated to treat signs and symptoms of mild-to-moderate PsO.

Oral Ritlecitinib and Brepocitinib for Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Results From a Randomized, Phase 2b Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The efficacy and safety of ritlecitinib (oral JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor) and brepocitinib (oral TYK2/JAK1 inhibitor) as induction therapy were assessed in patients with active, moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. METHODS: This phase 2b, parallel-arm, double-blind umbrella study randomized patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis to receive 8-week induction therapy with ritlecitinib (20, 70, 200 mg), brepocitinib (10, 30, 60 mg), or placebo once daily. The primary endpoint was total Mayo Score (TMS) at week 8. RESULTS: Of 319 randomized patients, 317 received ritlecitinib (n = 150), brepocitinib (n = 142), or placebo (n = 25). The placebo-adjusted mean TMSs (90% confidence interval) at week 8 were -2.0 (-3.2 to -0.9), -3.9 (-5.0 to -2.7), and -4.6 (-5.8 to -3.5) for ritlecitinib 20, 70, and 200 mg, respectively (P = .003, P < .001, P < .001), and -1.8 (-2.9 to -0.7), -2.3 (-3.4 to -1.1), and -3.2 (-4.3 to -2.1) for brepocitinib 10, 30, and 60 mg, respectively (P = .009, P = .001, P < .001). Estimates (90% confidence interval) for placebo-adjusted proportions of patients with modified clinical remission at week 8 were 13.7% (0.5%-24.2%), 32.7% (20.2%-45.3%), and 36.0% (23.6%-48.6%) for ritlecitinib 20, 70, and 200 mg, respectively, and 14.6% (1.9%-25.7%), 25.5% (11.0%-38.1%), and 25.5% (11.0%-38.1%) for brepocitinib 10, 30, and 60 mg, respectively. Adverse events were mostly mild, and there were no serious cases of herpes zoster infection. Infections were observed with brepocitinib (16.9% [12.5%-23.7%]), ritlecitinib (8.7% [5.2%-13.4%]), and placebo (4.0% [0.2%-17.6%]). One death due to myocardial infarction (ritlecitinib) and 1 thromboembolic event (brepocitinib) occurred; both were considered unrelated to study drug. CONCLUSIONS: Ritlecitinib and brepocitinib induction therapies were more effective than placebo for the treatment of moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis, with an acceptable short-term safety profile. CLINICALTRIALS: gov number: NCT02958865.

Efficacy and safety of oral ritlecitinib for the treatment of active nonsegmental vitiligo: A randomized phase 2b clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by depigmented patches of the skin. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ritlecitinib, an oral JAK3 (Janus kinase)/TEC (tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocelluar carcinoma) inhibitor, in patients with active nonsegmental vitiligo in a phase 2b trial (NCT03715829). METHODS: Patients were randomized to once-daily oral ritlecitinib ± 4-week loading dose (200/50 mg, 100/50 mg, 30 mg, or 10 mg) or placebo for 24 weeks (dose-ranging period). Patients subsequently received ritlecitinib 200/50 mg daily in a 24-week extension period. The primary efficacy endpoint was percent change from baseline in Facial-Vitiligo Area Scoring Index at week 24. RESULTS: A total of 364 patients were treated in the dose-ranging period. Significant differences from placebo in percent change from baseline in Facial-Vitiligo Area Scoring Index were observed for the ritlecitinib 50 mg groups with (-21.2 vs 2.1; P < .001) or without (-18.5 vs 2.1; P < .001) a loading dose and ritlecitinib 30 mg group (-14.6 vs 2.1; P = .01). Accelerated improvement was observed after treatment with ritlecitinib 200/50 mg in the extension period (n = 187). No dose-dependent trends in treatment-emergent or serious adverse events were observed across the 48-week treatment. LIMITATIONS: Patients with stable vitiligo only were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Oral ritlecitinib was effective and well tolerated over 48 weeks in patients with active nonsegmental vitiligo.

Performance of Modified ALMS and BLISS Criteria with Standard of Care Treatment in Two US Health Care Systems.

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken in a predominantly Black population undergoing standard treatment for lupus nephritis (LN) to estimate the incidence of, and risk factors for, complete response (CR) according to modified Aspreva Lupus Management Study (mALMS) and modified Belimumab International Study in Lupus Nephritis (mBLISS) criteria by 12 months. METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven LN class III or IV ± V, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio of ≥1gm/gm and estimated glomerular filtration rate of >50 ml/minute/1.73 m2 at the time of the incident LN flare were included. The clinical, treatment, and laboratory factors associated with CR were identified using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Of 173 patients, 86.1% were women, 77.5% were Black, and over half (59.5%) had non-commercial insurance. By 12 months, 20.6% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 14.6-28.6%) achieved mALMS CR and 33.7% (95% CI 26.4-42.4%) achieved mBLISS CR. Factors associated with mBLISS CR were commercial insurance (adjusted CR ratio = 3.5 [95% CI 1.9-6.7]; P < 0.001), albumin (adjusted CR ratio = 1.8 per 1 gm/dl increase in albumin; P = 0.02), and low C4 (adjusted CR ratio = 2.6; P = 0.03). Cumulative incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) at 3 years was 23.1% (95% CI 15.7-31.3%) and 6.1% (95% CI 2.8-11.1%) for death. Patients with non-commercial insurance were more likely to develop ESRD, with cumulative incidence of 30.4% (95% CI 19.6-41.9%) compared to 12.7% (95% CI 5.0-24.2%) for patients with commercial insurance (P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: In a primarily Black, uninsured LN population, despite achieving similar CR rates at 12 months, the incidence of ESRD and death exceeded those observed in controlled clinical trials with placebo arms.

A shared tissue transcriptome signature and pathways in psoriasis and ulcerative colitis.

Despite multiple efficacious therapies in common between psoriasis (PS) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC), mechanisms underlying their common pathophysiology remain largely unclear. Here we sought to establish a link by evaluating expression differences and pathway alterations in diseased tissues. We identified two sets of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between lesional and nonlesional tissues in meta-analyses of data collected from baseline samples in 3 UC and then 3 PS available clinical studies from Pfizer. A shared gene signature was defined by 190 DEGs common to both diseases. Commonly dysregulated pathways identified via enrichment analysis include interferon signaling, partly driven by genes IFI6, CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11, which may attract chemotaxis of Th1 cells to inflammatory sites; IL-23 pathway (IL-23A, CCL20, PI3, CXCL1, LCN2); and Th17 pathway except IL-17A. Elevated expression of costimulatory molecules ICOS and CTLA4 suggests ongoing T-cell activation in both diseases. The clinical value of the shared signature is demonstrated by a gene set improvement score reflecting post-treatment molecular improvement for each disease. This is the first study using transcriptomic meta-analysis to define a tissue gene signature and pathways dysregulated in both PS and UC. These findings suggest immune mechanisms may initiate and sustain inflammation similarly in the two diseases.

Safety and Efficacy of Ritlecitinib and Brepocitinib in Alopecia Areata: Results from the Crossover Open-Label Extension of the ALLEGRO Phase 2a Trial.

The 24-week, double-blind period of the ALLEGRO phase 2a trial (NCT02974868) evaluated the safety and efficacy of ritlecitinib (Jak3/tyrosine kinase expressed in the hepatocellular carcinoma inhibitor) and brepocitinib (tyrosine kinase 2/Jak1 inhibitor) in patients with alopecia areata; patients could subsequently continue treatment in a 24-week single-blind extension, followed by a crossover open-label extension, described in this article. Patients who did not achieve ≥30% improvement from baseline in Severity of Alopecia Tool score at the end of the single-blind extension entered a 24-week crossover open-label extension: the ritlecitinib group switched to brepocitinib, and the brepocitinib group switched to ritlecitinib. Eighteen patients switched to brepocitinib, and five switched to ritlecitinib. Six treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by five patients; no new safety risks were observed after crossover. An exploratory efficacy evaluation showed that none of the five patients receiving ritlecitinib in the crossover open-label extension achieved ≥30% improvement from baseline in Severity of Alopecia Tool score or improvement in eyebrow/eyelash assessments. Four of 16 patients receiving brepocitinib achieved ≥30% improvement from baseline in Severity of Alopecia Tool score or better; 4 of 15 and 5 of 12 showed improvement in eyebrow and eyelash assessments, respectively. Although the small number of patients precludes firm conclusions regarding efficacy, the data suggest that some patients with alopecia areata and inadequate response to ritlecitinib after ≥24 weeks show benefit after switching to brepocitinib.