Relation of T-wave alternans to mortality and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome from the MERLIN-TIMI 36 trial of ranolazine versus placebo.

We explored the utility of T-wave alternans (TWA) in predicting mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). Maximum TWA was calculated using Modified Moving Average method from continuous electrocardiographic recordings in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <40% and ventricular tachycardia (VT) ≥4 beats during index hospitalization or sudden cardiac death during the follow-up year and age- and sex-matched controls in the Metabolic Efficiency with Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (MERLIN-TIMI) 36 trial. All patients received standard therapy for NSTEACS plus ranolazine (n = 109) or placebo (n = 101). Median follow-up was 1 year. Baseline clinical characteristics did not differ between patients with elevated TWA (≥47 µV) compared with lower levels. Patients with TWA ≥47 µV at admission had increased risk of total mortality (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] 2.35, p = 0.04) during follow-up and VT ≥4 beats (ORadj 2.70, p = 0.01) during hospitalization with a trend toward increased cardiovascular death risk (ORadj 2.18, p = 0.07) during follow-up. In patients receiving placebo, TWA ≥47 µV on day 6 was associated with increased risk of total mortality (OR 4.12, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 13.64, p = 0.02) and cardiovascular death (OR 4.73, p = 0.01) during follow-up. No deaths occurred among patients with TWA ≥47 µV assigned to ranolazine. In conclusion, in patients with NSTEACS and left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, TWA ≥47 µV early after admission is associated with increased risk of mortality at 1 year and with nonsustained VT during hospitalization. TWA may be useful in risk estimation in patients with NSTEACS. The possibility that TWA may serve as a therapeutic target deserves further exploration.

Ranolazine injection into coronary or femoral arteries exerts marked, transient regional vasodilation without systemic hypotension in an intact porcine model.

BACKGROUND: We examined whether intracoronary or intrafemoral administration of ranolazine produces local vasodilation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Effects of intra-arterial ranolazine on coronary and femoral artery vasodilation and systemic hemodynamic function were studied in anesthetized pigs (n=27). Ranolazine, nitroglycerin, or saline (control) was injected into the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery or femoral artery (2-mL bolus in 10 seconds). Pretreatment with prazosin (300 µg/kg IV) allowed determination of α(1)-adrenergic receptor involvement (n=8). Rapid intracoronary administration of ranolazine (0.048 mg/kg) to achieve high local concentrations resulted in 91±11% increase in LAD coronary artery flow and 39±7% reduction in coronary vascular resistance (both, P<0.0001). This effect lasted 2-3 minutes without change in heart rate or rate-pressure product. Mean arterial pressure decreased marginally (by 2±1 mm Hg, P=0.01). Maximum systemic plasma concentration (0.93±0.29 µmol/L) remained in subtherapeutic range. Pretreatment with prazosin abolished these effects. Intracoronary nitroglycerin (100 µg) increased LAD coronary artery flow by 112±25% (P=0.02), but the effect lasted <2 minutes; mean arterial pressure decreased by 4±1 mm Hg (P=0.01). Intrafemoral injection of ranolazine (0.24 mg/kg, ie, one-tenth of the systemic bolus) resulted in a 70±19% increase in femoral artery flow (P=0.05) and 26±5% reduction in femoral artery resistance (P=0.004). At 2 minutes after the injection, the femoral flow remained 16±9% above the baseline and dilatory effects occurred without tolerance to repeated injections. CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary or intrafemoral ranolazine bolus exerts a marked, 2- to 3-minute dilatory effect that is comparable to nitroglycerin in magnitude but more persistent, attributable primarily to α(1)-adrenergic blockade.

Antifibrillatory effect of ranolazine during severe coronary stenosis in the intact porcine model.

BACKGROUND: Clinical evidence suggests that the antianginal agent ranolazine has antiarrhythmic properties, but its effects on vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation (VF) and T-wave alternans (TWA) during coronary artery stenosis have not been measured. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether the antiarrhythmic effect of ranolazine during acute coronary stenosis could be quantified by measuring VF threshold and TWA magnitude. METHODS: Electrode catheters placed in the left ventricular apex were used to determine VF threshold during ventricular pacing at 130 beats/min, and TWA was quantified from epicardial electrograms using modified moving average method (N = 18). Left anterior descending coronary flow was reduced with a balloon occluder by 75% for 10 minutes. The I(Kr) blocker E-4031 was used to distinguish effects of late I(Na) and I(Kr) inhibition by ranolazine. RESULTS: Before stenosis, ranolazine and E-4031 increased VF threshold from 32 ± 4 mA to 46 ± 4 mA (mean ± SEM), P = .02, and from 33 ± 5 mA to 40 ± 9 mA, P = .02, respectively. During stenosis, ranolazine increased VF threshold from 19 ± 2 mA to 33 ± 3 mA (P = .02), whereas E-4031 decreased VF threshold from 21 ± 3 mA to 15 ± 3 mA (P = .02). The ischemia-induced increase in TWA was suppressed by ranolazine but not by E-4031, consistent with effects of these agents on VF threshold. CONCLUSION: Ranolazine exerts significant antifibrillatory effects during coronary stenosis through direct effects on cardiac electrical properties independent of coronary flow. Ranolazine's antifibrillatory action during myocardial ischemia does not appear to be mediated by blockade of I(Kr) but rather by inhibition of late I(Na). TWA changes paralleled vulnerability to VF as indicated by VF threshold testing.