RESUMO
INTRODUCTION@#Large-volume paracentesis (LVP) is the first-line treatment for decompensated cirrhosis with refractory ascites. While ascitic drain removal (ADR) within 72 hours of the procedure was once considered safe, it was uncertain whether ADR within 24 hours could further reduce the risk of ascitic drain-related bacterial peritonitis (AdBP). This study aimed to investigate the association between the timing of ADR and the presence of AdBP.@*METHODS@#All patients with cirrhosis with refractory ascites who underwent LVP in our institution from 2014 to 2017 were studied. AdBP was diagnosed based on an ascitic fluid neutrophil count ≥ 250 cells/mm@*RESULTS@#A total of 131 patients who underwent LVP were followed up for 1,806 patient-months. Their mean age was 68.3 ± 11.6 years, and 65.6% were male. Their mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 15.2. The overall incidence of AdBP was 5.3%. ADR beyond 24 hours was significantly associated with a longer median length of stay (five days vs. three days, p < 0.001), higher risk of AdBP (0% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.042) and acute kidney injury (AKI) following LVP (odds ratio 20.0, 95% confidence interval 2.4-164.2, p = 0.021). The overall survival was similar in patients who underwent ADR within and beyond 24 hours of LVP.@*CONCLUSION@#ADR within 24 hours of LVP is associated with a reduced risk of AdBP and AKI. As AdBP is associated with resistant organisms and AKI, we recommend prompt ADR within 24 hours, especially in patients who have Child-Pugh class C alcoholic cirrhosis.
RESUMO
Background Self-sampling for SARS-CoV-2 would significantly raise testing capacity and reduce healthcare worker (HCW) exposure to infectious droplets personal, and protective equipment (PPE) use. Methods We conducted a diagnostic accuracy study where subjects with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 (n=401) and healthy volunteers (n=100) were asked to self-swab from their oropharynx and mid-turbinate (OPMT), and self-collect saliva. The results of these samples were compared to an OPMT performed by a HCW in the same patient at the same session. Results In subjects confirmed to have COVID-19, the detection rates of the HCW-swab, self-swab, saliva, and combined self-swab plus saliva samples were 82.8%, 75.1%, 74.3% and 86.5% respectively. All samples obtained from healthy volunteers were tested negative. Compared to HCW-swab, the detection rates of a self-swab sample and saliva sample were inferior by 8.7% (95%CI: 2.4% to 15.0%, p=0.006) and 9.5% (95%CI: 3.1% to 15.8%, p=0.003) respectively. The combined detection rate of self-swab and saliva had a higher detection rate of 2.7% (95%CI: -2.6% to 8.0%, p=0.321). The sensitivity of both the self-collection methods are higher when the Ct value of the HCW swab is less than 30. The negative correctness of both the self-swab and saliva testing was 100% (95% CI 96.4% to 100%). Conclusion Our study provides evidence that detection rates of self-collected OPMT swab and saliva samples were inferior to a HCW swab, but they could still be useful testing tools in the appropriate clinical settings.
