Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Behav Processes ; 86(1): 138-42, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21087658

RESUMO

Frogs are able to respond to a prey stimulus throughout their 360° ground-level visual field as well as in the superior visual field. We compared the likelihood of frogs choosing between a more nasally located, ground-level prey versus a more temporally located ground-level prey, when the prey at the nasal location is further away from the frog. Two crickets were presented simultaneously at 9 pairs of angles that included both crickets in the binocular visual field, both crickets in the monocular visual field, or one cricket in the binocular field and one in the monocular field. Frogs chose the more nasally located prey at least 71% of the time when the more temporal prey was in the monocular field; and 64% of the time when both prey were in the binocular field. Frogs tended to choose the more nasally located prey, even though it takes the frog longer to reach the prey. In addition, when given a choice between a prey located at ground level versus a prey located in the superior field, frogs tend to choose the prey at ground-level. These results suggest that there is a neural mechanism that biases frogs' responses to prey stimuli.


Assuntos
Comportamento Predatório/fisiologia , Análise de Variância , Animais , Comportamento de Escolha/fisiologia , Lateralidade Funcional/fisiologia , Gryllidae , Movimento (Física) , Rana pipiens , Reconhecimento Psicológico/fisiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Visão Binocular/fisiologia , Visão Monocular/fisiologia , Campos Visuais/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA