Abnormal cleavage up to Day 3 does not compromise live birth and neonatal outcomes of embryos that have achieved full blastulation: a retrospective cohort study.

STUDY QUESTION: Do embryos displaying abnormal cleavage (ABNCL) up to Day 3 have compromised live birth rates and neonatal outcomes if full blastulation has been achieved prior to transfer? SUMMARY ANSWER: ABNCL is associated with reduced full blastulation rates but does not impact live birth rates and neonatal outcomes once full blastulation has been achieved. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY?: It is widely accepted that ABNCL is associated with reduced implantation rates of embryos when transferred at the cleavage stage. However, evidence is scarce in the literature reporting birth outcomes from blastocysts arising from ABNCL embryos, likely because they are ranked low priority for transfer. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective cohort study included 1562 consecutive autologous in vitro fertilization cycles (maternal age 35.1 ± 4.7 years) performed at Fertility North, Australia between January 2017 and June 2022. Fresh transfers were performed on Day 3 or 5, with remaining embryos cultured up to Day 6 before vitrification. A total of 6019 embryos were subject to blastocyst culture, and a subset of 664 resulting frozen blastocysts was included for live birth and neonatal outcome analyses following single transfers. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: ABNCL events were annotated from the first mitotic division up to Day 3, including direct cleavage (DC), reverse cleavage (RC) and <6 intercellular contact points at the 4-cell stage (<6ICCP). For DC and RC in combination, the ratios of affected blastomeres over the total number of all blastomeres up to Day 3 were also recorded. All pregnancies were followed up until birth with gestational age, birthweight, and sex of the baby being recorded. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Full blastulation rates for embryos showing DC (19.5%), RC (41.7%), <6ICCP (58.8%), and mixed (≥2) ABNCL types (26.4%) were lower than the rates for those without ABNCL (67.2%, P < 0.01 respectively). Subgroup analysis showed declining full blastulation rates with increasing ratios of combined DC/RC affected blastomeres over all blastomeres up to the 8-cell stage (66.2% when 0 affected, 47.0% when 0.25 affected, 27.4% when 0.5 affected, 14.5% when 0.75 affected, and 7.7% when all affected, P < 0.01). However, once full blastulation had been achieved, no difference was detected between DC, RC, <6ICCP, and no ABNCL blastocysts following single frozen transfers in subsequent live birth rates (25.9%, 33.0%, 36.0% versus 30.8%, P > 0.05, respectively), gestational age (38.7 ± 1.6, 38.5 ± 1.2, 38.3 ± 3.5 versus 38.5 ± 1.8 weeks, P > 0.05, respectively) and birthweight (3343.0 ± 649.1, 3378.2 ± 538.4, 3352.6 ± 841.3 versus 3313.9 ± 509.6 g, P > 0.05, respectively). Multiple regression (logistic or linear as appropriate) confirmed no differences in all of the above measures after accounting for potential confounders. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our study is limited by its retrospective nature, making it impossible to control every known or unknown confounder. Embryos in our dataset, being surplus after selection for fresh transfer, may not represent the general embryo population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our findings highlight the incremental impact of ABNCL, depending on the ratio of affected blastomeres up to Day 3, on subsequent full blastulation. The reassuring live birth and neonatal outcomes of ABNCL blastocysts imply a potential self-correction mechanism among those embryos reaching the blastocyst stage, which provides valuable guidance for clinical practice and patient counseling. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETTING INTEREST(S): This research is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship. All authors report no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Spontaneous collapse as a prognostic marker for human blastocysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

STUDY QUESTION: Is spontaneous collapse (SC) by human blastocysts a prognostic factor in IVF treatment? SUMMARY ANSWER: SC in human blastocyst is associated with reduced euploid embryo and pregnancy rates. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: SC of the human blastocyst is a phenomenon that was revealed relatively recently following the clinical application of time-lapse monitoring in IVF laboratories. The ploidy and clinical prognosis of affected blastocysts are still poorly understood, with inconsistent reports. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on this topic are currently absent in the literature but its potential as a marker of embryo viability holds great clinical value. In this study, we aimed to comprehensively evaluate the potential of SC as a prognostic factor in regard to ploidy status, and pregnancy, live birth and miscarriage rates. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA guidelines, with a protocol registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022373749). A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies was carried out on 10 October 2022, using key words relevant to 'blastocyst collapse' and 'time-lapse imaging'. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Two independent reviewers systematically screened and evaluated each study in terms of participants, exposure, comparator, and outcomes (PECO). The Quality In Prognosis Studies tool was used for quality assessment. Data were extracted according to Cochrane methods. Pregnancy, live birth, ploidy, or miscarriage data were summarized by risk ratios (RRs) or odds ratios and their 95% CIs. All meta-analyses were performed with random-effects models. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Following removal of duplicates, a total of 196 records were identified by the initial search. After screening according to PECO, 19 articles were included for further eligibility assessment. For meta-analysis, seven retrospective cohort studies were eventually included. After data pooling, the incidence of blastocyst SC was 37.0% (2516/6801) among seven studies (ranging from 17.4% to 56.2%). SC was associated with significantly lower clinical pregnancy rates (two studies, n = 736; RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.62-0.95; I2 = 30%), ongoing pregnancy rates (five studies, n = 2503; RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.53-0.83; I2 = 60%), and reduced euploidy rates (three studies, n = 3569; RR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.59-0.83; I2 = 69%). Nevertheless, live birth rates (two studies, n = 816; RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.55-1.04; I2 = 56%) and miscarriage rate (four studies, n = 1358; RR = 1.31, 95% CI = 0.95-1.80; I2 = 0%) did not differ between blastocysts with or without SC. There was, however, significant heterogeneity between the studies included for evaluation of ongoing pregnancy rates (I2 = 60%, P = 0.04), live birth rates (I2 = 56%, P = 0.13), and ploidy rates (I2 = 69%, P = 0.04). Subgroup analyses were conducted according to different definitions of SC, number of collapse events, and whether the transferred blastocyst had undergone preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy; with inconclusive findings across subgroups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: All studies in the meta-analysis were retrospective with varying levels of heterogeneity for different outcomes. Not all studies had accounted for potential confounding factors, therefore only unadjusted data could be used in the main meta-analysis. Studies employed slightly different strategies when defining blastocyst SC. Standardization in the definition for SC is needed to improve comparability between future studies. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our results indicate that blastocyst SC has negative implications for a pregnancy. Such blastocysts should be given a low ranking when selecting from a cohort for intrauterine transfer. Blastocyst SC should be considered as a contributing variable when building blastocyst algorithms to predict pregnancy or live birth. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): There is no external funding to report. All authors report no conflict of interest. REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022373749.

A survey of scientists' awareness of and attitudes to the use of human blood products and alternatives in human assisted reproductive technology.

Scientists working in assisted reproduction [members of Scientists in Reproductive Technology (SIRT) Australia, and subscribers of the online forums EmbryoMail and Quartec] were invited to complete an online questionnaire on the use of human blood products in assisted reproductive technologies (ART). A total of 260 started the questionnaire, with 208 (80%) completing it. A total of 62% of respondents had worked in human ART ≥8 years and 68% had post-graduate qualifications. The majority (82%) reported using products of animal or human origin, with 75% knowing why protein was added to culture media and 41% not worried by this. Almost half (49%) of respondents were unaware of regulations surrounding the use of human blood products in health care and 70% were unaware of adverse events involving human blood products in human ART. Most respondents (70%) indicated that they were not concerned about infections such as hepatitis, but agents such as prions were a cause for concern (57%). A total of 57% of respondents were unaware of alternatives, but 77% would use a suitable alternative. Using blood products in human ART is surrounded by a lack of awareness, often independent of respondents' qualifications or experience. A better understanding of these products and possible alternatives is required if informed decisions about their suitability are to be made.