Adverse risk factors for salvage radiotherapy outcomes after radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To investigate salvage treatment approaches and treatment outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: In this retrospective, multicenter study, 272 patients who underwent salvage radiotherapy (RT) ± androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for recurrent prostate cancer after RP between 2007 and 2021 were analysed. Univariate analyses of time to biochemical and clinical relapse after salvage therapies were conducted using Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests. Multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards model to determine the risk factors for disease relapse. RESULTS: Median age was 65 (48-82) years. All patients underwent salvage prostate bed RT. Pelvic lymphatic RT was performed in 66 patients (24.3%) and ADT was included in 158 (58.1%) patients. The median PSA value before RT was 0.35 ng/mL. The median follow-up time was 64 (12-180) months. 5-years bRFS, cRFS, and OS were 75.1%, 84.8%, and 94.9% respectively. In multivariate cox regression analysis; seminal vesicle invasion (HR 8.64, 95% CI 3.47-21.48, p < 0.001), pre-RT PSA higher than 0.14 ng/mL (HR 3.79, 95% CI 1.47-9.78, p = 0.006), and ≥ 2 positive pelvic lymph nodes (HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.11-5.62, p = 0.027) were found to be unfavorable prognostic factors for bRFS. CONCLUSION: Salvage RT ± ADT provided 5-years biochemical disease control in 75.1% of patients. Seminal vesicle invasion, ≥ 2 positive pelvic nodes and delayed administration of salvage RT (PSA levels higher than 0.14 ng/mL) were found to be adverse risk factors for relapse. Such factors should be taken into account during the decision process on salvage treatment.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Valid Salvage Treatment Option.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a dismal disease. Recurrence is inevitable despite initial surgery and postoperative temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy. Salvage surgery is the standard treatment in selected patients. Chemotherapy, biological agents, and re-irradiation are other treatment approaches available. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is nowadays a common treatment as a salvage treatment option. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the files of 132 GBM cases treated between 2010 and 2018. All patients received TMZ and radiotherapy after surgery or biopsy. Among the patients who had recurrence, we identified 42 cases treated with salvage SRT. The CyberKnife robotic system was used to administer SRT. RESULTS: While the median follow-up time for all patients was 16 months (range 1-123), the median follow-up time for patients treated with SRT after initial diagnosis was 26.5 months (range 9-123). The median follow-up time after SRT was 10 months (range 2-107). SRT was performed in a median of 3 fractions (range 2-5). The median prescription dose was 20 Gy (range 18-30). While the median actuarial survival after initial diagnosis for patients treated with salvage SRT was 30 months (range 9-123), it was only 14 months (range 1-111) for patients who could not be treated with salvage SRT (p = 0.001). The median survival time after SRT was 12 months, and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 48 and 9%, respectively. The time to progression after SRT was 5 months (range 1-62), and 6-month and 1-year progression-free survival rates were 50 and 22%, respectively. Patients with longer time to recurrence >12 months had longer overall survival with respect to the ones having recurrence <12 months (p < 0.001). Salvage surgery had been performed in 7 out of 42 patients before SRT. These reoperated patients had significantly worse survival after SRT when compared to the patients who underwent SRT alone (p = 0.02). SRT was well tolerated and there was no grade III/IV toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: SRT is a viable salvage treatment option for recurrent GBM. SRT provides acceptable local control and survival benefit for recurrent GBM cases. SRT can be considered especially in patients with long time to recurrence.

Prognostic factors for survival in patients with gastric cancer: Single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate survival outcomes and survival-related prognostic factors in gastric cancer patients who were followed-up or received adjuvant therapy in our center. METHODS: Patients with gastric cancer treated between 2005 and 2016 were evaluated retrospectively. We included 345 non-metastatic (stage I-III) gastric cancer patients in the study. The clinical, demographic, histologic data of the patients and treatment characteristics were obtained from the patient's files. RESULTS: While 50 patients were stage I, 94 patients were stage II, 201 patients were stage III. While 221 patients (64%) presenting with serosal or adjacent visceral organ invasion or with involved lymph nodes were treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 124 patients presenting with early-stage disease were followed after surgery. Median follow up time was 34 months (4-156 months). While the median overall survival (OS) was 51 months, median disease-free survival (DFS) was 35 months. Overall survival and disease-free survival rates for 1st, 3rd and 5th years were 85%, 55%, 45% and 72%, 49%, 38%, respectively. According to univariate analysis, tumor size, T stage (p<0.001), N stage (p<0.001), TNM stage (p<0.001), grade (p<0.001) and presence of lymphovascular invasion (p=0.005) were determined as prognostic factors that affect overall survival significantly. According to the multivariate analysis, only T and N stage (p<0.001) were determined as independent prognostic factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: Many different prognostic factors have been defined for gastric cancer. In concordance with the literature, we found T and N stages as prognostic factors in univariate and multivariate analysis.