RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Some studies have previously suggested the involvement of antibodies directed against CD36 (anti-CD36) in the pathogenesis of thrombosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of anti-CD36 in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and its relationship with thrombosis. METHODS: Anti-CD36 were tested using an indirect MAIPA assay in 62 patients with autoimmune aPL but without SLE; there were 38 with and 24 without thrombosis. Nineteen patients with thrombosis served as an aPL(-) control group and 58 healthy subjects as the normal control group. RESULTS: 15 of 62 aPL patients (24.2%) but only 1 of 58 (1.7%) normal controls had anti-CD36 (p < 0.0005). As compared to normal controls, the prevalence of anti-CD36 was significantly higher in aPL patients with (26.3%, p < 0.0005) or without thrombosis (20.8%, p < 0.01). Anti-CD36 were significantly more frequent in aPL patients with thrombosis than in thrombosis aPL(-) subjects (26.3% vs 0%, p = 0.02). The presence of anti-CD36 seems to be more frequent in aPL patients with recurrent thrombosis than in those with a single episode (36.8% vs 15.8%). CONCLUSION: The presence of anti-CD36 is highly prevalent in patients with autoimmune aPL with a trend to being more frequent in patients with recurrent episodes of thrombosis.
Assuntos
Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/imunologia , Autoanticorpos/imunologia , Antígenos CD36/imunologia , Trombose/imunologia , Adulto , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Recidiva , Trombose/complicaçõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate plasma levels of markers of platelet, endothelial cell and blood coagulation activation in leprosy patients with or without antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and to compare them to those found in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: 42 patients with leprosy (35 lepromatous and 7 borderline): 29 aPL(+) and 13 aPL(-), as well as 26 healthy subjects as normal controls (NC) and 79 control aPL patients without leprosy (59 with and 20 without APS) were included in the study. Plasma soluble P and E selectin (sPsel and sEsel), and VCAM-1 (sVCAM-1), prothrombin F1 + 2 fragment (F1 + 2), thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT) and D dimer (DD) were measured by ELISA. The protein C pathway was assessed by the ProC global test. RESULTS: Leprosy patients with aPL presented increased median levels of sPsel [ng/ml (82.0 vs 36.0, p < 0.001)] and sVCAM-1 [ng/ml (495 vs 335, p < 0.001)] compared to NC, as observed in control aPL patients without leprosy. Levels of sPsel in aPL(+) patients with leprosy were significantly higher than in aPL(-) ones (52.5 ng/ml), p = 0.005. However, plasma markers of thrombin generation were increased in control aPL patients without leprosy but not in those with leprosy. ProcC global test was abnormal in 24.1% of leprosy patients with aPL compared to 4.4% of NC (p < 0.024), and to 57.2% of control patients with aPL without leprosy (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that although patients with leprosy present a high prevalence of aPL, and platelet and endothelial cell activation in vivo to the same extent than patients with APS, they do not show a procoagulant state.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antifosfolipídeos/sangue , Coagulação Sanguínea/fisiologia , Plaquetas/fisiologia , Endotélio Vascular/fisiologia , Hanseníase Dimorfa/sangue , Hanseníase Virchowiana/sangue , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antitrombina III , Biomarcadores/sangue , Moléculas de Adesão Celular/sangue , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/análise , Glicoproteínas/imunologia , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/análise , Imunoglobulina M/análise , Inibidor de Coagulação do Lúpus/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/sangue , Peptídeo Hidrolases/sangue , Proteína C/análise , Protrombina , beta 2-Glicoproteína IRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate plasma levels of markers of platelet, endothelial cell and blood coagulation activation in leprosy patients with or without antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and to compare them to those found in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: 42 patients with leprosy (35 lepromatous and 7 borderline): 29 aPL(+) and 13 aPL(-), as well as 26 healthy subjects as normal controls (NC) and 79 control aPL patients without leprosy (59 with and 20 without APS) were included in the study. Plasma soluble P and E selectin (sPsel and sEsel), and VCAM-1 (sVCAM-1), prothrombin F1 + 2 fragment (F1 + 2), thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT) and D dimer (DD) were measured by ELISA. The protein C pathway was assessed by the ProC global test. RESULTS: Leprosy patients with aPL presented increased median levels of sPsel [ng/ml (82.0 vs 36.0, p smaller 0.001)] and sVCAM-1 [ng/ml (495 vs 335, p smaller 0.001)] compared to NC, as observed in control aPL patients without leprosy. Levels of sPsel in aPL(+) patients with leprosy were significantly higher than in aPL(-) ones (52.5 ng/ml), p = 0.005. However, plasma markers of thrombin generation were increased in control aPL patients without leprosy but not in those with leprosy. ProcC global test was abnormal in 24.1 per cent of leprosy patients with aPL compared to 4.4 per cent of NC (p smaller 0.024), and to 57.2 per cent of control patients with aPL without leprosy (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that although patients with leprosy present a high prevalence of aPL, and platelet and endothelial cell activation in vivo to the same extent than patients with APS, they do not show a procoagulant state.
