Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vojnosanit Pregl ; 72(9): 765-9, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26554107

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: Suture materials play an important role in healing, enabling reconstruction and reassembly of tissue separated by the surgical procedure or trauma, and at the same time facilitating and promoting healing and hemostasis. Suture materials are used daily in oral surgery, and are considered to be substances most commonly implanted in human body. The aim of this clinical study was to examine the speed of wound healing and complications incidence, after the use of three different absorbable synthetic suture materials in oral surgery (catgut, Dexon and Vicryl rapide), and to ascertain which one is the most suitable for oral surgery. METHODS: The study was conducted on 96 patients undergoing root resection or surgical extraction of third molars. Each of the suture materials (catgut, Dexon and Vicryl rapide) was used for 8 root resections and 8 surgical third molar extractions in the maxilla, as well as in the mandible (a total of 32 surgical interventions for each suture material). RESULTS: The faster wound healing was obtained with Vicryl rapide compared to other two suturing material tested. There was no significant difference regarding the presence of local reaction in all the three groups of patients on the 21st postoperative day. CONCLUSION: The results of our clinical study point out that Vycril- rapid contributes more than catgut or Dexon to faster healing of human wounds, with fewer incidences of wound dehiscence and milder local reactions.


Assuntos
Categute/efeitos adversos , Poliglactina 910/farmacologia , Ácido Poliglicólico/farmacologia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória , Técnicas de Sutura , Doenças Dentárias/cirurgia , Extração Dentária , Raiz Dentária/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/etiologia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/prevenção & controle , Técnicas de Sutura/efeitos adversos , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentação , Extração Dentária/efeitos adversos , Extração Dentária/instrumentação , Extração Dentária/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização
2.
Vojnosanit Pregl ; 72(5): 397-404, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26165046

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: The most common materials implanted in the human organism are suture materials that are classified on the basis of several criteria, usually the origin, structure, and properties. The properties of suture materials are related to its absorbability and non-absorbability. When using resorbable materials it is of great importance to determine whether its absorbability and tensile strength help wound healing in function of time. Sutures themselves can become a source of inflammation, that may reduce or compromise the potential of reparation and regeneration. The aim of this experimental study on dogs was to ascertain whether the absorption rate and the degree of local tissue reactions differ from information provided by the manufacturers, whether there are differences between the applied suture materials and which of the used suture materials have better effect on wound healing. METHODS: Experimental testing of the selected suture materials basic characteristics was performed on 6 German Shepherd dogs, which, after induction of general anesthesia, were made 3 identical incisions each in all 4 quadrants (left and right side of the upper and lower jaws), so that 12 horizontal incisions were formed, 10 mm long, 20-25 mm distant from one another, on each animal. Randomly, incisions were stitched up in the following order, starting from back to front: catgut, Dexon®, Vicryl-Rapid®. The experiment was terminated by histopathological examination of tissue samples, taken on postoperative day 3, 7, 14 and 21 in order to identify the effect of healing and the degree of local reaction. RESULTS: The obtained results suggest that catgut has the highest absorption rate, while Dexon® the lowest. Vicryl- Rapid® causes the lowest level of local reactions, while Dexon® the highest. CONCLUSION: There is no ideal suture material because various patient factors also influence the wound healing process.


Assuntos
Gengiva/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Bucais/instrumentação , Suturas , Cicatrização , Animais , Categute , Cães , Gengiva/patologia , Modelos Anatômicos , Poliglactina 910 , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos/instrumentação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...