Inpatient Infliximab Biosimilar Cost-Savings: Cost Analysis of Inpatient Treatment with Originator Infliximab (Remicade™) versus Biosimilar Infliximab (Renflexis™) for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

INTRODUCTION: Infliximab (IFX) is a standard, inpatient salvage therapy for the treatment of refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). Remicade™ is the originator IFX. Its biosimilar Renflexis™ offers a reduced cost structure. We performed a cost-minimization analysis to compare costs with Remicade™ and Renflexis™ for the inpatient treatment of ASUC. METHODS: Retrospective clinical and financial data were obtained from 34 inpatients with refractory ASUC who received Renflexis™ (n = 17) or Remicade™ (n = 17) between 2019 and 2021. Clinical data included admission and discharge laboratory values. Financial data included a decision support drug cost (DSDC), constituting the total cost associated with inpatient IFX administration, and total inpatient cost of care. The following equation generated a ratio (rDSDC) representing the percentage of drug cost (or DSDC) of the total inpatient cost of care, after controlling for IFX dose and length of stay: [DSDC of IFX/Number of Units of IFX] ÷ [Total Inpatient Cost of Care/Length of Stay in Days]. Median and non-parametric Wilcoxon ranked sum test were used for analyzing patient demographics, clinical, and financial data. RESULTS: No differences were found in baseline or discharge clinical parameters. The median unadjusted ratio of DSDC to total inpatient cost of care was 0.387 versus 0.241 in the Remicade™ versus Renflexis™ groups (p = 0.0025), respectively, representing an absolute difference of ∼14%. Median adjusted rDSDC were 0.04 versus 0.024 in the Remicade™ versus Renflexis™ groups, respectively, representing a relative cost reduction of ∼40% (p = 0.0001). DISCUSSION: The unadjusted absolute cost reduction and adjusted relative cost reduction were, respectively, 14% and 40% in the Renflexis™ group as compared to Remicade™, when treating inpatient ASUC. Our calculation included median DSDC as a percentage of the total inpatient cost of care, controlling for IFX dose and length of stay. This reduced cost structure promotes use of Renflexis™ for ASUC inpatients and may reduce costs systemically.

Discordance Between Inflammatory Bowel Disease Specialists and Insurance Authorization Denials-A Survey of Specific Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatment Scenarios.

Background: Prior authorizations are generally required by insurers for gastroenterologists to prescribe biologics and small-molecule drugs to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Authorization denials occur in a wide variety of clinical scenarios, including denials of standard and nonstandard medication dosing. Methods: We performed a national cross-sectional survey on a broad variety of specific clinical scenarios to assess experience and opinions on whether or not insurance authorization denials are in accordance with clinical expertise. Results: Eighty-four gastroenterologists completed the survey. Denial experience was common for infliximab dose modifications, vedolizumab dose modifications, ustekinumab first-time therapy, and maintenance dosing. The bulk of disagreement with authorization denials involved scenarios of dose escalation and re-induction guided by both loss of clinical response and/or therapeutic drug monitoring, denial of re-authorizations of stable dosing, and use of non-anti-TNFs in specific patient populations including the elderly and patients with multiple comorbidities. Respondents unanimously agreed that insurance companies do not play an adequate role in helping patients obtain PA. Furthermore, most of the respondents agree that to decrease the burden of the PA process, peer-peer processes should be between other IBD-trained providers who understand these complex treatment strategies. Conclusions: Our cross-sectional survey highlights the degree of discordance in clinical decision-making between insurers and gastroenterologists. Further engagement between gastroenterologists and insurers is needed to foster common understanding on these discordant authorization denials in these real-world clinical IBD scenarios.

Acute idiopathic pancreatitis is associated with more aggressive disease course in Crohn's disease but not in ulcerative colitis.

PURPOSE: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), whether Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC), have an increased risk of acute pancreatitis. The prognostic value of diagnosing acute idiopathic pancreatitis in patients with IBD is not well understood. METHODS: A retrospective review of 56 patients with IBD and acute pancreatitis was conducted in a tertiary center from 2011 to 2020. Aggressive disease course was defined as (i)biologic change, (ii)biologic dose escalation, or (iii)IBD-related surgeries occurring within 1 year of acute pancreatitis diagnosis. Logistic regression modelling identified associations between covariates and an aggressive disease course. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics between idiopathic pancreatitis and other causes of acute pancreatitis, in both CD and UC cohorts, were similar. Idiopathic pancreatitis was significantly associated with an aggressive disease course in CD (P = 0.04). No confounding factors were associated with an aggressive disease course in CD. Idiopathic pancreatitis, however, was not associated with an aggressive disease course in UC (P = 0.35). CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of acute idiopathic pancreatitis may provide a prognostic indicator of a more severe disease course in CD. No such association appears to exist with UC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that identifies an association and possible prognostic value between idiopathic pancreatitis and a more severe disease course in CD. More studies with a larger sample size are needed to validate these findings, further define idiopathic pancreatitis as an extraintestinal manifestation of IBD and elucidate a clinical strategy to optimize care in patients with aggressive CD and idiopathic pancreatitis.

Dietary manipulation of the gut microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease patients: Pilot study.

Diet is a modifiable, noninvasive, inexpensive behavior that is crucial in shaping the intestinal microbiome. A microbiome "imbalance" or dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is linked to inflammation. Here, we aim to define the impact of specific foods on bacterial species commonly depleted in patients with IBD to better inform dietary treatment. We performed a single-arm, pre-post intervention trial. After a baseline period, a dietary intervention with the IBD-Anti-Inflammatory Diet (IBD-AID) was initiated. We collected stool and blood samples and assessed dietary intake throughout the study. We applied advanced computational approaches to define and model complex interactions between the foods reported and the microbiome. A dense dataset comprising 553 dietary records and 340 stool samples was obtained from 22 participants. Consumption of prebiotics, probiotics, and beneficial foods correlated with increased abundance of Clostridia and Bacteroides, commonly depleted in IBD cohorts. We further show that specific foods categorized as prebiotics or adverse foods are correlated to levels of cytokines in serum (i.e., GM-CSF, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-alpha) that play a central role in IBD pathogenesis. By using robust predictive analytics, this study represents the first steps to detangle diet-microbiome and diet-immune interactions to inform personalized nutrition for patients suffering from dysbiosis-related IBD.

The conundrum of indeterminate QuantiFERON-TB Gold results before anti-tumor necrosis factor initiation.

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) is a key cytokine in both the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the host defense against tuberculosis (TB). Consequently, anti-TNFα medications result in an increased risk of latent TB infection (LTBI) reactivation. Here, we sought to evaluate the factors affecting the results of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assay as a screening tool for LTBI. METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective study in patients with IBD and RA who underwent LTBI screening using QFT-GIT at UMass Memorial Medical Center between 2008 and 2016 prior to initiation of anti-TNF medications. RESULTS: We included 107 and 89 patients with IBD and RA, respectively. We found that a higher proportion of IBD patients had indeterminate QFT-GIT result compared to RA patients. Furthermore, we found that the majority of patients with indeterminate results were tested during an acute flare of IBD (88%) and while taking corticosteroids. Of all patients receiving ≥20 mg equivalent prednisone dose (n=32), 63% resulted in indeterminate QFT-GIT, compared to only 6% indeterminate testing in patients receiving <20 mg of equivalent prednisone dose (n=164, P<0.001). There was no correlation between indeterminate results and age, gender, disease duration, or distribution, or smoking status within each population. CONCLUSION: We observed that high-dose corticosteroids may affect QFT-GIT outcomes leading to a high proportion of indeterminate results. We propose that IBD patients should be tested prior to initiation of corticosteroids to avoid equivocal results and prevent potential delays in initiation of anti-TNF medications.

Using Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Identify Variable Infliximab Metabolism in an Individual Patient With Ulcerative Colitis.

Biological drugs have significantly improved the quality of life of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. However, after 15 years of using these drugs in practice, we just now are beginning to better understand how to use them most effectively. It has become evident that antitumor necrosis factor agents, such as infliximab, have variable drug clearance across individuals, mostly related to the disease burden at the time of an infusion. In this case report, we demonstrate how therapeutic drug monitoring can be used to personalize a dosing regimen to ensure appropriate induction, and to safely deescalate therapy after remission is achieved. By identifying a change in drug clearance in an individual patient over time, we were able to attain significant cost savings despite the high price of serially measured drug and antibody concentrations.

Fecal Microbiota Transplant: Treatment Options for Clostridium difficile Infection in the Intensive Care Unit.

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has steadily increased in incidence since the 1990s, with an associated increase in recurrence and severity, which has in turn lead to more intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. The development of recurrent CDI, in particular, has been associated with increasing patient morbidity and mortality as well as an immense financial burden on the health care system. Recently, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has received much publicity as an effective means of treatment for recurrent CDI. The goal of this review is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of CDI, with a particular focus on FMT and its utilization in the ICU.

Tamoxifen-associated portal vein thrombosis causing severe oesophageal variceal bleeding.

A 46-year-old woman with medical history of breast cancer on tamoxifen presented with syncope. On arrival to the hospital, the patient developed massive haematemesis and a subsequent esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed oesophageal varices without any known history of liver disease. Further evaluation identified portal vein thrombosis probably caused by tamoxifen use.

Efficacy and safety of natalizumab in Crohn's disease patients treated at 6 Boston academic hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Despite trials demonstrating its efficacy, many physicians harbor concerns regarding the use of natalizumab in the treatment of patients with refractory Crohn's disease (CD). The purpose of this study was to perform a descriptive analysis of a series of CD patients not currently enrolled in a clinical trial. METHODS: A retrospective case review of patients treated with natalizumab at 6 sites in Massachusetts: Boston Medical Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Lahey Clinic, Massachusetts General Hospital, and UMass Medical Center. RESULTS: Data on 69 CD patients on natalizumab were collected. At the start of treatment, patients' disease duration was 12 years. A high proportion of patients were women (68%), presented with perianal disease (65%) and upper gastrointestinal tract involvement (14%). Prior nonbiologic therapies were steroids (96%), thiopurines (94%), antibiotics (74%), methotrexate (58%), and at least two anti-tumor necrosis factor agent failures (81%). Sixty-nine percent (44 of 64 patients) with available medical evaluation had a partial or complete clinical response. Loss of response was 13% after an average of 1 year of treatment. Adverse events were infusion reactions, headaches, fever, and infections. No case of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In our clinical experience outside the context of a clinical trial, natalizumab is largely reserved for CD patients with extensive ileocolonic disease who have failed conventional immunosuppressants and of at least 2 anti-tumor necrosis factor agents. This drug is, however, well tolerated and offers significant clinical improvement for more than a year in one-third of these difficult-to-treat CD patients.

Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy has been adopted as the preferred method to screen for colorectal neoplasia in the United States. However, lesions can be missed because of numerous factors, including location on the proximal aspect of folds or flexures, where they may be difficult to detect with the forward-viewing colonoscope. The Third Eye Retroscope (TER) is a disposable device that is passed through the instrument channel of a standard colonoscope to provide a retrograde view that complements the forward view of the colonoscope during withdrawal. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether experience with the TER affects polyp detection rates and procedure times in experienced endoscopists who had not previously used the equipment. DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: This was an open-label, prospective, multicenter study at 9 U.S. sites, involving 298 patients presenting for colonoscopy, evaluating the use of the TER in combination with a standard colonoscope. INTERVENTIONS: After cecal intubation, the TER was inserted through the instrument channel of the colonoscope. During withdrawal, the forward and retrograde video images were observed simultaneously on a wide-screen monitor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome measures were the number and size of adenomas and all polyps detected with the standard colonoscope and with the colonoscope combined with the TER. Secondary outcome measures were withdrawal phase time and total procedure time. Each endoscopist examined 20 subjects, divided into quartiles according to the order of their procedures, and results were compared among quartiles. RESULTS: Overall, 182 polyps were detected with the colonoscope and 27 additional polyps with the TER, a 14.8% increase (P < .001). A total of 100 adenomas were detected with the colonoscope and 16 more with the TER, a 16.0% increase (P < .001). For procedures performed after each endoscopist had completed 15 procedures while using the TER, the mean additional detection rates with the TER were 17.0% for all polyps (P < .001) and 25.0% for adenomas (P < .001). For lesions 6 mm or larger, the overall additional detection rates with the TER for all polyps and for adenomas were 23.2% and 24.3%, respectively. For lesions 10 mm or larger, the overall additional detection rates with the TER for all polyps and for adenomas were 22.6% and 19.0%, respectively. The mean withdrawal times in the first and fourth quartiles were 10.6 and 9.2 minutes, respectively (P = .044). LIMITATIONS: There was no randomization or separate control group. The endoscopists judged whether each lesion could have been detected with the colonscope alone by using their standard technique. CONCLUSIONS: Polyp detection rates improved significantly with the TER, especially after 15 procedures, when the mean additional detection rate for adenomas was 25.0%. Additional detection rates with the TER for medium-size and large adenomas were greater than for smaller lesions. These results suggest that, compared with a colonoscope alone, a retrograde-viewing device can increase detection rates for clinically significant adenomas without detriment to procedure time or procedure complications. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00969124.).