Quantification of prostate MRSI data by model-based time domain fitting and frequency domain analysis.

This paper compares two spectral processing methods for obtaining quantitative measures from in vivo prostate spectra, evaluates their effectiveness, and discusses the necessary modifications for accurate results. A frequency domain analysis (FDA) method based on peak integration was compared with a time domain fitting (TDF) method, a model-based nonlinear least squares fitting algorithm. The accuracy of both methods at estimating the choline + creatine + polyamines to citrate ratio (CCP:C) was tested using Monte Carlo simulations, empirical phantom MRSI data and in vivo MRSI data. The paper discusses the different approaches employed to achieve the quantification of the overlapping choline, creatine and polyamine resonances. Monte Carlo simulations showed induced biases on the estimated CCP:C ratios. Both methods were successful in identifying tumor tissue, provided that the CCP:C ratio was greater than a given (normal) threshold. Both methods predicted the same voxel condition in 94% of the in vivo voxels (68 out of 72). Both TDF and FDA methods had the ability to identify malignant voxels in an artifact-free case study using the estimated CCP:C ratio. Comparing the ratios estimated by the TDF and the FDA, the methods predicted the same spectrum type in 17 out of 18 voxels of the in vivo case study (94.4%).

Tissue segmentation and classification of MRSI data using canonical correlation analysis.

In this article an accurate and efficient technique for tissue typing is presented. The proposed technique is based on Canonical Correlation Analysis, a statistical method able to simultaneously exploit the spectral and spatial information characterizing the Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging (MRSI) data. Recently, Canonical Correlation Analysis has been successfully applied to other types of biomedical data, such as functional MRI data. Here, Canonical Correlation Analysis is adapted for MRSI data processing in order to retrieve in an accurate and efficient way the possible tissue types that characterize the organ under investigation. The potential and limitations of the new technique have been investigated by using simulated as well as in vivo prostate MRSI data, and extensive studies demonstrate a high accuracy, robustness, and efficiency. Moreover, the performance of Canonical Correlation Analysis has been compared to that of ordinary correlation analysis. The test results show that Canonical Correlation Analysis performs best in terms of accuracy and robustness.