Psychosocial training in U.S. internal medicine and family practice residency programs.

PURPOSE: Competence in the psychosocial aspects of medical care is necessary for primary care physicians to function effectively. This study investigated the psychosocial training internal medicine and family practice residents receive in U.S. programs. METHODS: In 1996, program directors of all U.S. internal medicine (IM) and family practice (FP) residency programs were surveyed regarding the format, content, and quantity of psychosocial training provided in their programs, their opinions on topics related to psychosocial training, and demographics of their programs. RESULTS: The response rate was 61%. Ninety-nine percent of FP and 62% of IM program directors reported requiring at least one psychosocial training experience. Family practice programs required an average of 352 hours (SD +/- 175; range 27-2,664) of psychosocial training compared with 118 hours (SD +/- 272; range 0-1,050) for IM programs. Most IM and FP program directors expected residents to achieve at least basic competency in virtually all psychosocial topic areas; however, FP programs provided a greater range of psychosocial experiences. FP program directors most often identified psychologists and IM program directors most often identified internists as providing the most psychosocial training in their programs. Both IM and FP program directors considered lack of curricular time to be the main obstacle to development of psychosocial training. CONCLUSION: Residents' competence in psychosocial areas is important to both IM and FP program directors. However, content and time devoted to psychosocial training vary considerably both within and between program types.

A new educational approach for supporting the professional development of third-year medical students.

This paper describes a new course designed to support the professional development of third-year medical students. The course runs through the clinical clerkships, and has several additional features: it includes a multidisciplinary faculty; it is centrally based in the medical school; it addresses students' values and attitudes in addition to their knowledge and skills; and it makes use of small-group learning methods, and faculty, student, and group continuity during the year. The curriculum, which addresses ethical, social, and communicative issues in medicine, plus the evaluation of students and of the course, are described.

A semiotic perspective on chronic pain: implications for the interaction between patient and physician.

A semiotic conceptualization of pain in the chronic pain syndrome is proposed. It is suggested that among chronic pain patients pain ceases to be an icon or an index and acquires a symbolic structure: this transformation interferes with the usual patient-physician relationship. The semiotic perspective on the structure of meaning in the chronic pain syndrome underlines the need to include a psychotherapeutic approach in the patient-physician relationship; specific aspects of the approach to chronic pain as a symbolic communication are discussed.

A first-year problem-based curriculum in health promotion and disease prevention.

This paper describes Harvard Medical School's integration of a curriculum on health promotion and disease prevention into the first year of its New Pathway to General Medical Education. The goals of the curriculum were to develop in each student (1) the knowledge and skills necessary to evaluate critically the major issues in prevention and (2) an attitude that acknowledges the pertinence of prevention in virtually every clinical encounter. The case method was used for all teaching in the curriculum, as it is throughout the New Pathway. Students worked together in small groups, addressing the issues raised by each case under the direction of faculty preceptors. The component was taught by clinicians as part of a two-year course in which students learned clinical skills and addressed topics from the social sciences and medical humanities. In addition, issues in health promotion and disease prevention were integrated into the cases used to teach the other components of the New Pathway curriculum.

Dipstick urinalysis screening of asymptomatic adults for urinary tract disorders. I. Hematuria and proteinuria.

We review evidence on the value of dipstick urinalysis screening for hemoglobin and protein in asymptomatic adults. In young adults, evidence from five population-based studies indicates that fewer than 2% of those with a positive heme dipstick have a serious and treatable urinary tract disease, too few to justify screening and the risks of subsequent workup. For older populations, evidence is contradictory and no recommendation can presently be made for or against hematuria screening. A population-based randomized, controlled trial of hematuria screening in the elderly is urgently needed. Proteinuria screening is not recommended in any healthy, asymptomatic adult population, since four population-based studies have found that fewer than 1.5% of those with positive dipsticks have serious and treatable urinary tract disorders.

Dipstick urinalysis screening of asymptomatic adults for urinary tract disorders. II. Bacteriuria.

Using criteria adopted by the US Preventive Services Task Force, we evaluated use of the dipstick urinalysis to screen for bacteriuria. When the leukocyte esterase and nitrite dipstick tests are combined, the positive predictive value for detecting bacteriuria exceeded 12% in groups with a 5% or higher prevalence of bacteriuria: women who are pregnant, diabetic, or over 60 years of age and all institutionalized elderly. Conventional antimicrobial regimens for asymptomatic bacteriuria have proved efficacious only for pregnant women. We conclude that pregnant women should be screened for bacteriuria, but with the more sensitive urine culture, because treatment prevents serious fetal and maternal sequelae. Dipstick screening may be justified in women who are over 60 years of age or diabetic. The prevalence of bacteriuria in other groups is too low to justify screening.